99
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 28 points 11 months ago

These people are unhinged.

[-] Masterblaster@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

i feel like society as a whole would improve greatly if they just, you know, didn't exist. it's almost as if we stand on the verge of a complete global catastrophe and the only way to resolve it is to get rid of them all. entirely.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] don@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

🌍👨‍🚀🔫🧑🏻‍🚀always have been.

[-] Nightwingdragon@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

So....talk to me like I'm a MAGA moron with less brain cells than teeth and a family tree that doesn't always fork in all the right places.

What's the problem here? Seriously. Even if Taylor Swift were personally touring the country, knocking on every single door, and telling people to vote for Biden. So? Isn't that what their staffers should also be doing so they can get re-elected? So what if she stands on the podium if the Chiefs win the Super Bowl and says that everybody in the stadium and watching at home should vote for Biden?

Like at what point does it cross from the political activism that thousands of people across the country engage in all the time to some kind of "psyop" (side note: This is the stupidest term I have ever heard, by the way), "election interference", or whatever other term they can come up with to imply what she's doing is illegal?

Are they scared that Taylor Swift commands a bigger audience than Trump? Are they worried about millions of Swifties marching in lockstep to the ballot box to vote for Biden? Are they really all that concerned because a celebrity who has so far shown absolutely no desire even dip a toe into that political shitstorm might say something that might cause people to vote for Biden?

Are these people seriously getting all worked up over a celebrity who has shown no desire to give political commentary at all simply because she might endorse Biden? Or is this another situation where they're pre-emptively setting Taylor Swift of all people up as the person to blame if Trump loses? Last time he did this, he said that everything is rigged and that's the only way he could lose. Is the party really setting up for a round 2 where they blame Taylor fucking Swift?

Because that's not going to work out for them. Taylor Swift is probably one of the biggest celebrities in the country right now, maybe only rivalled by people like the Rock. And that's a hell of a maybe. Do they think pissing off a shit-ton of Swifties in red states is going to work? Fucking LOL. Try that and they'll be lucky if all that happens is a few purple states go blue. Swifties are not going to be abandoning Taylor Swift on the word of Donald fucking Trump.

[-] ook_the_librarian@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

We should consider it a faux pas for a news organization to report on the punditry of other news org that is "two steps below it".

If nbcnews wants to cover something "conservatives" are saying, they shouldn't reach deep. They should consider the twitter account End Wokeness to be so far beneath it that reporting on it directly should feel dirty.

Now if fox news or even newsmax picks it up, then maybe start attacking this nonsense. Right now it seems to the crazies that we are taking them seriously. Why else would NBC News cover it?

[-] ToastedPlanet@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 10 months ago

It would be like CNN reporting on our Lemmy posts. It doesn't make sense to treat Twitter as if it's the news. It's how Trump had a stranglehold on the news cycle from a White House toilet. The news couldn't stop reporting on his tweets.

If I wanted to get my news from Twitter I would go to Twitter. I go to news organizations to hear real news, not stream of consciousness thoughts from public figures. I'm concerned how much actual news we've missed because news pundits are too busy checking social media to actually report on the news.

[-] spujb@lemmy.cafe 2 points 10 months ago

i’m seeing this more often recently and i appreciate people who identify it and call it out

[-] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 15 points 11 months ago

*Football team that’s been a dominant presence in the league for the last several seasons wins AFC Championship again and will be returning to the Super Bowl*

Conservatives: TAYLOR SWIFT DID THIS TO GET JOE BIDEN REELECTED!!!1!!

[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

Plus Taylor Swift who has been immensely popular for like...What, over a decade now? Only now suddenly wielding her influence to run the government or something? Please, she's rich, popular, and in business, she basically operates as her own independent nation without needing to run anyone else's. 😂

[-] PrettyLights@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

She turns 35 just before the next president takes office, meaning this is the first election she could legally become president. Coincidence???

Absolutely a coincidence. This is all a marketing stunt, but the conspiracies have been fun to read.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

She's also been doing get out the vote/voter registration campaigns since at least 2018. She has officially endorsed multiple Democrats in the past, including Biden in the general election in 2020. None of this is new or a secret. Conservatives think they have uncovered some grand plot though. Like Taylor Swift needs the NFL and she wouldn't have any publicity or influence without it. If anything it's probably the opposite, with NFL trying to use Taylor Swift to boost their own popularity more.

[-] 1024_Kibibytes@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago

I heard NPR say that she's brought in roughly $300 million to the NFL because so many more women are now watching

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Seriously. There is a conspiracy here, and it's to get the Chief's to win. /s. Probably. Not really. Yes I'm bitter.

All joking aside I miss when we could have "low stake" conspiracy theories. Now we have genuine flat earthers and the like, it's only a matter of time before someone weaponizes the "birds aren't real" meme. I swear god people will look back at pizzagate as the definitive marker where the world forgot 4chan was primarily a joke.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Syndic@feddit.de 1 points 10 months ago

Well she did dare to encourage her fans to vote! And that's obviously anti-democratic or something.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago

WTF? She probably has more fans than the NFL and these morons think she’s getting signal boosted?

Obviously this is a psyop to boost awareness that the Chiefs exist.

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

It bothers me so much to know how stupid I am and also know there are so many people even stupider than me.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago

Think for a moment how stupid the average person is...Then realise that half the population is dumber than that. - George Carlin

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

*median, but we'll let it slide, George

It kind of plays into the joke anyway

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

MAGA has chosen the wrong boogeyman this time.

[-] Case@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 10 months ago

I didn't expect the revolution to be led by tween pop fans, but I remember middle school.

Vicious.

[-] Conyak@lemmy.tf 4 points 10 months ago

If you think her fans are just tweens you are in for a big surprise. She is extremely popular with most age groups. Hell, I don’t even listen to a lot of pop but I find myself singing along to her songs.

[-] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Yup. I’m a man in my thirties who has never been anything close to a “Swiftie” but when Midnights dominated the charts I decided to give it a listen and a good chunk of it resonated with me. Not the music itself, though it isn’t bad. Kind of generic modern pop. It’s her lyrics that sell it. I felt a bit like that Danny Devito “I get it” gif from the end of IASIP season 13.

Edit: (That said, I pride myself on being able to find things to appreciate about media I wouldn’t otherwise consume, and so I’m prone to liking things. Your mileage may vary.)

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Something is happening here

What it is ain't exactly clear...

[-] toonicycle@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Taylor Swift has been putting out hits for 15 years. It's definitely more than just tweens at this point.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago

There's gonna be three sides to the next civil war: secede, stay, and the swifties; and the swifties are going to have the largest army. I don't know why they think picking this fight is in any way intelligent.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 months ago

Telling people to vote, either in a general sense or for a specific party, is just communication. That's not a psyop. Simply appearing at football games is also not a psyop.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

There are many fine establishments that allow you to bet on the outcome of NFL games.

So all those conservatives are placing bets now, right?

[-] callouscomic@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

could be part of an orchestrated plot to drum up hype for the Democratic Party.

What if it was? Then what? Isn't that just marketing? Commercialization? I mean... what? Why even care?

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Oh no. Please don't target Taylor Swift. Oh gosh. Conservatives, this will just ruin everything for all other people. You can't do this. Her like bazillion fans are definitely too young to vote. Ah. No. Stop.

[-] cybersandwich@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

I hope she kneels on the stage.

[-] Pratai@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 months ago

The same dipshits also think Ted (pedophile) Nugent is an American hero.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

I wasn't aware it worked like that, that because a certain team won, everyone has to do what Swift wnats...

In fact I'm sure it doesn't....

I know Conservative arguments don't often make sense, and by design are meant to be catchy slogans more than accurate precise arguments, but... shit sometimes they make it too obvious.

[-] Kalkaline@leminal.space 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] autotldr 1 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Swift’s appearance on the field following last night’s game between the Kansas City Chiefs and the Baltimore Ravens sparked a fresh wave of social media vitriol and the resurgence of some conspiring that her near-dominant place in U.S. pop culture must be the result of some sort of psychological manipulation effort — known more colloquially in fringe circles as a “psy-op.”

Vivek Ramaswamy, who dropped out of the Republican primary race this month, shared his own conspiracy theory on X Monday, suggesting that the Super Bowl will be rigged to favor “an artificially culturally propped-up couple” whom he believes will reveal a “major presidential endorsement” this fall.

The Pentagon shut down similar right-wing accusations earlier this month after conservative commentator Jesse Watters claimed that Swift was a potential “front for a covert political agenda.”

In 2019, she shared an open letter urging Tennessee Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Republican, to support the federal Equality Act, which would enshrine protections for LGBTQ+ people.

The singer netted the highest favorability rating of any public figure tested in NBC News’ November 2023 national poll — with 40% of registered voters saying they have a positive opinion of Swift and only 16% saying they hold a negative one.

Some online, including those in the football world, have wondered why right-wing pundits seem to concern themselves with Swift’s relationship with Chiefs’ tight end Travis Kelce.


The original article contains 890 words, the summary contains 229 words. Saved 74%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

BWAHAHA THE EVIL PLOT TO TAKE OVER THE GOVERNMENT BY CAREFULLY CONTROLLING THE POSITION OF A POINTY BALL IN A FIELD OVER A SPAN OF TIME IS UNFOLDING EXACTLY AS I HAVE FORESEEN!

NOW WE JUST NEED TO CONTROL THE POSITION OF A BOUNCY BALL ON A SHINY FLOOR AND MY CURSE WILL BE UNLEASHED, ENSURING THAT ANY DIMPLED BALL HIT BY A CONSERVATIVE'S METAL STICK WILL LAND IN TREES, SAND, OR WATER.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

[-] bacon_saber@fedia.io 1 points 11 months ago

Pentagon spokesperson Sabrina Singh described Watters’ commentary as a “conspiracy theory.”

“We are going to shake it off,” she told Politico, referencing a popular Swift song.

Unexpected Pentagon humor

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Let's say it's all true. Who gives a fuck? Endorsements have been a thing forever.

Do they want to burn her at the stake for witch craft like it's fucking 1724 because she's controlling people's minds and stealing their ~~erections~~ elections?

[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

all this bullshit does is make this heavy metal head want to listen to Swift. Good job numbnuts.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Jan 2024
99 points (93.0% liked)

politics

19239 readers
2322 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS