280
As a reminder, the first targets of Nazi book-burning were LGBT+ too: Magnus Hirschfeld's Institute for Sex Research.
Part of how they can run with the "trans treatment is experimental!" canard, is that they fucking burned the research almost a century ago.
Yup. Even the Nazis didn't full Nazi right away. Don't think it can't happen here.
If anyone sane had any sense (and the money to do it, I guess), they'd do a montage of all the fascists of history burning books and end with the one of her - that, or play the historical montage side by side with her video. Do the same for any other candidates elsewhere with similar stances.
Play that on every channel until the money dries up.
The money won't dry up.
There're plenty of people out there who do blame "the Jews" or "the Gays" or "the Immigrants" or "the Others" dor all their problems.
They also think they are the heros making a sacrifice by doing the lesser evil in their own stories.
Somehow I don’t think rebroadcasting this to an even larger audience is a good idea considering this person is already voluntarily posting a video of them book burning without a shred of irony.
I don’t think the people that they are appealing to will be dissuaded by a contrasting video. They’d probably see the comparison as flattering.
Book burnings does not make you the good guy.
That is why I think the "The Cruelty Is the Point" Article by Adam Serwer in 2018 was so important.
The ones who burned the books were always on the wrong side of history. Yet, they still do it. And I guess it is because the vile and harassing actions is an integral part of these people. The pain and suffering they bring to the people around them is what makes them feel good. They want to harm and destroy and are actively looking for people who cheer for them when they do. They want to find the people and the places where they can act in utterly disgrace and inhumane behaviour and are not ejected, but promoted. They are desperate to live out their inner cruel behavior as this is what brings them joy. This woman would literally fuck a guy who strangled a LGBTQ Member in front of her.
Adam Serwer:
But it’s not the burned, mutilated bodies that stick with me. It’s the faces of the white men in the crowd. There’s the photo of the lynching of Thomas Shipp and Abram Smith in Indiana in 1930, in which a white man can be seen grinning at the camera as he tenderly holds the hand of his wife or girlfriend. There’s the undated photo from Duluth, Minnesota, in which grinning white men stand next to the mutilated, half-naked bodies of two men lashed to a post in the street—one of the white men is straining to get into the picture, his smile cutting from ear to ear. There’s the photo of a crowd of white men huddled behind the smoldering corpse of a man burned to death; one of them is wearing a smart suit, a fedora hat, and a bright smile.
Their names have mostly been lost to time. But these grinning men were someone’s brother, son, husband, father. They were human beings, people who took immense pleasure in the utter cruelty of torturing others to death—and were so proud of doing so that they posed for photographs with their handiwork, jostling to ensure they caught the eye of the lens, so that the world would know they’d been there. Their cruelty made them feel good, it made them feel proud, it made them feel happy. And it made them feel closer to one another.
Their lack of shame gives them power. When dictators come to power one of their first acts is to make the other people around them direct accomplices in horrible acts. When Saddam Hussein purged the government he had other officials participate in the firing squad. It isn't just cruelty, it's a strategy, it takes the others around you over the edge and binds them to you. Them raising the stakes higher and higher with more and more shameless acts is a strategy to get their members to do whatever they want and to do more bold and brazen acts that can get them more power.
By doing this the only shame becomes nuance and self reflection. Feeling guilty, becomes being a buzzkill. It becomes socially reinforcing. You can’t be bad because if you’re bad all your loved ones are bad and they’ll judge you for ruining their fun or hate you we not being sufficiently committed to the cause
Exactly, the point is to isolate their supporters and strengthen their cult.
Thanks for sharing that. What a chilling image.
Wow. That's devastating.
It's not meant to make them look like the good guy, it's meant to make them look like the guy who's willing to "do what it takes to end the woke agenda." The way you get a bunch of people to support evil isn't by convincing them it's good, but by convincing them it's necessary.
Are we the baddies?
The party of burning books will never be the good guys.
“Do you ever read any of the books you burn?”
He laughed. “That’s against the law!”
“Oh. Of course.”
~Ray Bradbury, Fahrenheit 451
While I admire her sense of theatre, it’s much easier just to wear a t shirt with a big swastika on it.
Different time, same kind of people, burning books.
Next she'll be burning people and defending her actions by saying "they weren't really people by their own admissions"
“You want to be gay? Fine be gay. Just don’t do it around children,”
So what about the LGBTQ children. I suppose she has a final solution for that.
Fucking Nazi cunt. How long before these psychos start murdering our LGBTQ children? When do we start pushing back hard on these hateful shitbags?
So what about the LGBTQ children.
They don't believe such a thing exists until gay people turn them gay.
Really.
That's the "gay agenda" they always talk about. Gay people using the homosexual magic.
"They think I turned him gay with my magic genetalia."
I swear most of them must be deeply closeted and repressed for that to seem rational. They think the children can be tempted to gayness because they know, deep down, that they could be tempted.
Oh the right is all about final solutions.
The only thing that needs to be torched is conservatism.
It's so easy to torch conservatives, convert if you will, with just a little knowledge. Like over here at the librar...oh. Never mind.
Well played!
No matter what your opinions are, no matter what side of the political spectrum you are on, no matter what your reasons are for having books to destroy, how do you go to (or perform) a public book burning and not feel icky?
no matter what side of the political spectrum you are on
Well see, that's your problem. You're ignoring the fact that one end of the political spectrum adores fascism.
These are Christians doing the book burning (again). Their love language is making people other than themselves "feel icky."
Nearly every atrocity throughout history has had a Christian standing with a smirk watching what they caused with glee.
That's the big question. What is it psychologically behind such pathologically cruel and hateful people?
I've met so many adults over the years who have said "I've never read a novel in my life". I'd ask about required reading during school. Nope. Absolutely blew my mind the first time it happened. I've begun to really believe that a large percentage of the US population has no internal values or morals. Like not even the concept. Just external ones that they try to push on people.
Outrageous. Imagine being so brainwashed and delusional to do this.
What a dumb person.
In other words, a perfect candidate for the con cult, oops, I mean "party".
They are trying to out crazy each other because that makes them the most trump like. It's not enough to talk about banning books from public libraries, now you have to line them up and do a photo op with a flamethrower. It's just more of that virtue signaling they constantly accuse everyone else of doing.
What fucking sucks is that, while it may (or may not) initially just be posturing, this signalling is normalizing the craziness among their base. A non-zero amount of people will see this and think, "Hey! That's a good idea!" and replicate it.
It's always projection with the qons. ALWAYS.
I did NOT SEE that one coming.
ETA: I did indeed see it coming. The cons have been on this quest for some time.
I know the big picture here is it's a bad sign when mainstream party politicians start using openly fascist rhetoric.... but
I can't get over how derpy she looks in that thumbnail.
"FREEEDOOOOMMM! Except if you're not like us, then you can just burn!"
horrible horrible woman
As long as they are focused on books and a pro-LGBTQ person is in charge of the libraries internet filter.... uh, oh, CURSES! Now children who definitely read physical paper books and do not have phones will never accidentally stumble across these books and turn gay! Curse you GOP!
Ought to be considered a hate crime.
Hey loudmouth. Suck my dick. Everyone could use a break from hearing your "thoughts".
This is the best summary I could come up with:
A Republican candidate for Missouri secretary of state posted a viral campaign video Tuesday lighting LGBTQ-inclusive books on fire with a flamethrower.
Kathy Belge, one of the authors of “Queer: The Ultimate LGBTQ Guide for Teens,” said Americans “should be concerned that a candidate for public office not only thinks book burning is acceptable, but that it is something that will help her get elected.”
Some people compared Gomez’s actions to Nazi book-burning campaigns in the 1930s, when a student group burned tens of thousands of books in Germany and Austria that were considered “un-German.”
Gomez’s website echoes increasingly common inflammatory language used by conservatives in recent years to describe transition-related medical care for transgender minors.
Gomez’s book-burning video is part of a larger national trend of conservative candidates and lawmakers targeting books related to LGBTQ people and race for removal from public and school libraries, arguing that they are a form of “indoctrination” or are harmful for children.
Some, including Gomez, have even described LGBTQ-inclusive books and curricula as sexually grooming children, invoking a decades-old false moral panic about LGBTQ people.
The original article contains 1,025 words, the summary contains 182 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2024
280 points (96.4% liked)
politics
19088 readers
3796 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS