675
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) suggested Monday that Russian President Vladimir Putin has some sort of financial influence over former President Trump.

In an interview with MSNBC’s “Inside with Jen Psaki,” Pelosi said Putin is the “richest person in the world” and has “stiff competition” to being named the most evil person in the world.

Pelosi asked “what does he have on Donald Trump that he’d have to constantly be catering to Putin?”

Her comments came just after Trump doubled down on his criticism of NATO and said he would encourage Russia to attack U.S. allies who fail to reach the alliance’s defense spending goals. Trump has also declined to criticize Putin for the death of opposition leader Alexei Navalny in a Russian prison last week.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 246 points 8 months ago

Jesus Christ, Democrats. Stop pussyfooting around with this shit. He's a traitor. He's a rapist. He wants to be a dictator. Putin controls him. Just come right out and say this shit.

I've said this already once today. Just say these words: "If you vote for Trump, you're voting for a rapist." And say it repeatedly.

They can't even do that! Fucking baffling.

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 64 points 8 months ago

"If you vote for Trump, you're voting for a rapist."

This didn't really work that first time.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 31 points 8 months ago

Then nothing will work, but at least Dems can show some fucking spines instead of trying to compromise with traitors.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

But compromising with traitors is the best way to show progressives that traitors are better regarded by the party than they'll ever be.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Drusas@kbin.social 15 points 8 months ago

That's the tactic the Democrats used in 2016 when they lost. It seemed like a slam dunk tactic to point out that anyone voting for Trump was voting for someone who commits sexual assault against women, but his voters ate it up.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 8 points 8 months ago

Who fucking cares about his voters? The point is to motivate everyone else to vote and maybe catch undecided voters by showing a spine.

It didn't work in 2020 because Hilary's campaign focused on safe states instead of battleground states. The same thing worked in 2020 because Biden campaigned better. Both won the popular vote, but one didn't motivate where it mattered.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 5 points 8 months ago

I agree a hundred percent but whoever is still not motivated to vote against Trump probably secretly roots for him.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Do you really think this weak-ass shit they're doing right now will work better?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] gloss@discuss.tchncs.de 53 points 8 months ago

A tape was released where he boasted about committing sexual assault. He bragged about grabbing them by the pussy. That tape came out like a month or two before the 2016 election. An October surprise that would have sunk any other candidate in the history of the USA. His fans did not care at all. Most of them probably cheered him on.

Rape? This is the party who think it's impossible to rape your own wife. Rape doesn't even exist to them.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

An October surprise that would have sunk any other candidate in the history of the USA.

It only sinks your campaign if your voter base disapproves of the behavior. Trump won a majority of white women voters. An outright majority. Think about that.

Our country is so fucking misogynist that white women will hear "real estate cretin grabs actress by her crouch just because he can" and reply "as is his right" as though he's a fucking 13th century aristocrat claiming prima nocta.

This is the real primal power of a fascist campaign. You're not bound by the rules. You are, in fact, rewarded for breaking them. And the more rules you can break without anyone stopping you, the more popular appeal you possess.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Rape doesn't exist to MAGA people. They will vote for Trump anyway. They are not who they should be trying to reach.

Do you think that it shouldn't be brought up?

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] kautau@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

And trump just sold nearly half a million dollars in cheap chinese shoes in half a day. Idiots are idiots. And the "representative" of the LLC that was just formed a month ago to sell these shoes is Andrew Pierce, of Cloud Peak Law (which seems to be distancing themselves from that name really quickly lol) https://wyomingllcattorney.com/About.

They are a tax evasion firm. https://www.offshorealert.com/wyoming-asset-protection-law-firm-cloud-peak-seeks-to-quash-irs-summons-for-danish-tax-investigation/

Trump may be an idiot. Or he may be somebody pretending to be an idiot. But his team isn't. They are excellent at convincing idiots that they are smart by supporting him.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

But the civility. What will the donors think?

[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

Keep in mind the Trump v Biden election cycle hasn’t even started. September/October are going to be spicy.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (74 replies)
[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 54 points 8 months ago

This kind of adroit aloofness to reality is why Democrats struggle so hard.

The easiest to punch opponents they'll ever have, but they wont take a meaningful swing.

Come out and full throatedly say that voting Republican in 2024 is anti-Democratic and fascist. Fight while we've still got a chance.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 22 points 8 months ago

It doesn't help that she's accusing everyone of being paid off by Putin or the Chinese. The last ones she accused were pro-ceasefire activists because she can't imagine anyone would organically come to the conclusion that bombing babies is bad.

[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

She is herself full of Chinese influence

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Landmammals@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago

What does the CIA even do, if not investigate and handle exactly this situation?

[-] Rottcodd@kbin.social 32 points 8 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xtr0n@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

They probably killed Kennedy and MLK but now they’ve lost their edge?

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 9 points 8 months ago

CIA loves to prop up tyrants. Kennedy and MLK were opposed to tyrants.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I have no reason to think she's wrong here, but I also think people shouldn't be "suggesting" and "hinting at" these things. Instead, people should present the evidence to the prosecutors and let the man go to prison. You don't need any media circus for this to happen.

But then again, I guess everything is a presidential race now.

[-] BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The problem is time. Trump doesn't need any more criminal charges to send him to jail, he just needs the courts to finish doing their job, which takes time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 22 points 8 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] queue@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 8 months ago

Cool! Now are we gonna get any laws to prohibit this national security threat? Maybe ban shady donations from billionaires both American and abroad? Because if we just ban Putin from donating directly, they can just make a shell company in New York and fund him.

We're going to get the laws put into place to stop this, right? Anything to stop Trump from getting into the office again?

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Next she's going to suggest Alphabet has financial influence over Google!

[-] xc2215x@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

In other news the sun is hot.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

This is always said so dismissively. Like, even if everyone knows it, if it's still a problem it's a good idea to keep talking about it.

Better would be doing something about it, which she's not doing. But still.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

NO FUCKING SHIT NANCY

[-] recapitated@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

I'm inclined to believe this. But I wouldn't dare repeat it without better journalistic integrity.

Any staunch political operative saying anything at all about their opponent should be treated like nothing at all had been said, much less as news.

This goes for literally every statement that comes off of Trump's mouth and fingers too.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Any staunch political operative saying anything at all about their opponent should be treated like nothing at all had been said, much less as news.

I mean, this statement would carry more weight from someone who wasn't the in Leadership for 30 years thanks entirely do to her prodigious fundraising abilities. For Nancy Pelosi, a woman who coordinated $37M from disgraced cryptocurrency con-artist Sam Bankman Fried in exchange for carte blanche legislative authorship, to complain about someone being financially influenced...

It isn't that she's wrong, its that - from Ted Cruz to Adam Schiff - getting fat stacks for your campaign / private business / family in exchange for influence over public policy is totally normal. Democrats are orders of magnitude more terrified of AIPAC than any MAGA Republican is of a Russian influence peddling campaign. And they're all bent over and cheeks spread to JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, and the rest of the mega-banks.

The only thing that makes this news is the national understanding that getting kickbacks from a billionaire psychopath in Saudi Arabia or Korea is cool and good but getting them from a National Enemy like Putin is unacceptable.

[-] sturmblast@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

I mean, there's a lot of evidence to support the accusation.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 8 months ago

What other evidence do you require? All of his very well documented deals in Russia are only allowed if the Kremlin approves the contracts. Trump personally profits directly from those deals and he refused to put his holdings into a blind trust, casually continuing to profit off of dealings with the enemy.

[-] snownyte@kbin.social 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Do these people have a multi-year brain lapse of this stuff? We suspected and had a good idea about this 4 years ago (and longer). And only now does Pelosi figure it out?

More reason to not have old farts around.

[-] rdyoung@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

What makes you think she just figured it out? Good chance she was asked to not confirm it/talk about it publicly for some reason or didn't feel like it was right do so. Why? No mother fucking clue (and I'm not defending her) but guaranteed people at the cia, fbi, etc have known about this for decades which would mean anyone with a security clearance probably knew as well.

Remember when we were the crazy conspiracy nut jobs because we "knew" russia helped get trump elected with a social media psy op campaign? Pepperidge farms remembers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

And by "financial influence over" she means "has him by the balls"?

[-] ctkatz@lemmy.ml 8 points 8 months ago

this is one of those things that are fairly obvious if you thought about it for a while even if there was no evidence to prove it. because, sure he is deferential to autocrat strongmen but it was to a different scale with putin.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

This just in: bears found to defecate in the woods.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 5 points 8 months ago

Has since the 1980's.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
675 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19072 readers
3822 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS