450
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] flossdaily@lemmy.world 135 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter

Their viewers literally do not care about the truth.

Their entire belief system would be unraveled in minutes if they took the time to look at any original sources.

The "do your own research" crowd isn't smart enough, or isn't inclined to do even the slightest bit of actual research.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

They were never equipped to by the American education system.

[-] LapGoat@pawb.social 13 points 1 year ago

yeah sure, but as a person who's entire education was neglectful parents throwing a textbook in front of me and basically leaving me unsupervised, its kinda on them.

we have the entirety of human knowledge in our pockets and ive met conservatives who think the scps they see on tiktok exist and the government covers it up.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Congratulations 🍾 You have successfully displayed survival bias on the internet. Please accept your prize 🏆 before exiting.

[-] LapGoat@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago

ehhh not really, as I didnt go through the american education system. Im more like a plane that didnt see combat that returned to base with no bullet holes, so officers concluded that everything is borked and a single bullet will down a plane.

But what I am saying is that ehhhh shits dumb and people should be less dumb, and they really have no excuse for continuing to be dumb like this.

by all means, we should improve society somewhat, including the american education system. If the american education system was better, Id have likely been allowed to go to public school and would thus have better social skills, allowing me to party and live up being a young twink rather than chat with folks on a budding social media site.

If one person fails at something, maybe it is on them. We don’t want to rush into some kind of moral judgment about them deserving the consequences because they may have issues with their personal history, cognitive abilities, or relationships that led to the failure, but it’s still individual characteristics (even if it’s not their fault, per se).

If hundreds of thousands to millions of people are failing in the same way, we’re looking at a systemic problem rather than a personal one, and bootstraps aren’t the answer. Don’t think about it like someone who made it and is justifiably proud of what they did. Think about it like a statistician. How many people in similar circumstances to yours made it without falling into religious fundamentalism, conservative politics, or even substance abuse and being stuck wherever their birth landed them? I bet it’s a pretty high percentage, even if we only count the ones whose parents threw them a textbook.

Systemic problems require systemic solutions. We have a lot to get through before we can get there, but it’s still easier to fix if the problems are properly diagnosed - and demonstrably the existence of the internet and smartphones is not solving it.

[-] LapGoat@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

yes, however:

being a victim of a systemic problem doesnt really justify being a racist and homophobic bigot that clings to a false narrative in spite of overwhelming evidence.

and when a group of people have decided to be hateful to me because of shoddy reasons, ive decided I can say whatever I like about them.

[-] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

You got a textbook, most of these people never did.

[-] LapGoat@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

i hear you but we have the internet widely available.

Im not arguing that the american education system is adequate, im just saying that at some point, people have a responsibility to not follow belief systems that can be disproven with a few hours of research.

it requires a lot of head in sand to be a modern fundie repub

[-] Tavarin@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

The internet on its own is not a solution given anyone can make a website and say whatever they want on it.

I was arguing with a guy here on Lemmy who though nationalpriorities.com was a more reliable source of information than Wikipedia.

People need to be taught how to use the internet, how to find sources for the information and filter out lies and falsehoods. That takes a good education, which many people lack.

[-] LapGoat@pawb.social 0 points 1 year ago

a lot of people dont trust the school system or modern research and studies, its quite sad and i've no clue how to counteract that.

people who think school is liberal brainwashing arent going to listen to school when it teaches how to critical think.

Idk, school should get more funding, but again i think its that guys fault for thinking that.

dont get me wrong, that guy should also get the resources they need, but like...cmon...

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Bingo! A huge portion of the country are taught to: not question authority, study to the tests, and not critically think about things.

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The state will never give you the tools to overthrow it.

[-] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

What they mean when they say do you own research, they mean listen to their newscasters only and just trust them.. because they did the research and if you your self did it, it would be biased.... so just trust them bro. Crazy lunatics...

[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Worse than that, they will actively reject the truth when it's inconvenient to them. They will choose to believe her deceptive edits are somehow more true than actual reality, even if they flat out know it was deceptively edited.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

You mean manipulating? Thats manipulation

[-] Buffaloaf@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago

And Fox news audiences will never know about it

[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 36 points 1 year ago

Deceptive editing... they don't even have the decency to use a deep fake.

[-] thejml@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Does it matter? The people who believe her aren’t going to look into the quotes or even verify they happened because they think she’s right and it sounds plausible in their world view. They won’t see the articles showing she’s wrong. Laura’s not getting banned for manipulation because it’s manipulated in their favor. And if someone did ban her from appearing on Fox News she’d just hop to OANN or something instead and they’d blame “democrats” or “cancel culture” or some stupid made up reasoning for why and it’d probably strengthen their resolve in believing this BS.

[-] Xepher@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

I'm shocked. SHOCKED, I tell you.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Well, not that shocked?

[-] Saneless@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

They know it doesn't matter

The pawns will volunteer parroting the BS to all their friends. "Did you hear Biden say" and it will be a fact as far as their jello brains are concerned

[-] purahna@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 year ago

She was not "busted". She does it on purpose and knows that it doesn't matter how many times she'll be caught. She knows there will be no material consequences, not by her opponents, not by the fans, not by the legal system that's pretends its purpose is to keep people like her in check. It doesn't matter.

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

My question is, why has nobody filed a lawsuit against Fox News for committing these acts of deception?

There's got to be an angle somewhere. They are misleading the population while claiming to be a news source. There should be some sort of ruling that says that what a news source says has to at least have some grounding in the truth to the best of the newscasters ability to verify.

[-] namelessdread@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The law hasn't really caught up. There are regulations from the FCC, including in regards to distributing false information, but only for broadcast television. Fox News (and many others, such as CNN, MSNBC, etc) are cable news channels run by private providers, so they are not subject to those FCC regulations.

While companies have sued, such as Dominion, there really aren't any grounds for the audience/consumers suing. They didn't suffer any damages.

That being said, there do need to be changes in how ethics are enforced in media and journalism.

[-] Bizarroland@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

If the law is not up to date then it seems ripe for the picking.

Some enterprising law firm out there needs to find some clients and get on this because there's beautiful pocket change for their cut if they can figure out exactly the right angle to take.

[-] TigrisMorte@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

That under the Legal System, (we don't have a justice System), Citizens "didn’t suffer any damages" is the telling part.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Dominion and Smartmatic have.

[-] StalinIsMaiWaifu@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Its been brought up before (tucker Carlson argued in court mo reasonable person would believe him), the TLDR is the law is outdated and nobody with power cares

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Look at the glee in her eyes! Fucking psychopath lol

[-] starrox@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

She's not so good at hiding her political goals eh?

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 9 points 1 year ago
[-] danielton@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm not surprised at all. Fox Noise is Rupert Murdoch's propaganda channel.

She hates America so much

[-] StarServal@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Me: “How dare they!”

Also me: “I’m not going to investigate any further than the title because it sounds true.”

[-] Piecemakers3Dprints@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

one of them. one of them. one of them. one of them.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I watched the full video. She shortened the speech but did it change the meaning or make it deceptive? I don't like her message much but I missed where the deception came from. It seems like an opinion piece with her fully disagreeing with Biden. Am I missing something? Real question.

[-] thesprongler@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago

Dems back to lying, while GOP never left.

this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
450 points (96.7% liked)

politics

19097 readers
2909 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS