Are you fucked off about the title? 😉

DOPPELEDIT, Story time: Ich beobachte außerdem, dass Eltern die Spinnenangst inzwischen an ihre Kinder weitergeben. Neulich im Schulgarten wollte kaum ein Kind einen Regenwurm auf die Hand nehmen, und Fluginsekten werden, egal was es ist, angekreischt und weggeschlagen. Diese grundsätzliche Entfremdung und Dämonisierung von Natur bekümmert mich, den wie sollen diese kleinen Menschen einen Planeten retten, der für sie fremd, eklig und gefährlich ist. Die Natur ist aber keine Bühne für unsere Menschen-Show, wir sind ein kleiner Teil in diesen biologischen Netzen, die wir gerade im großen Stil zerstören. Jetzt habe ich ganz schön weit ausgeholt.

Dies!!!

The concept that generalising statements are still applicable, even if they are not correct for every single person in the generalised group, is a bit complex, but if you sit down and think hard about it you might get it.

The most pedantic comment on average, you mean.

Water under the bridge, no worries. I didn't realize you had deleted your comment because I replied trough my inbox. I deleted the response.

Women are so cute and I love you so much for your kind offer and the perception of all other species living in such a good way to be a bit of a down baby and a couple of Insects I guess it's a good thing to do with the female Chess league banking Transwomsn I see you in the world of a down baby and I don't know why they keep changing the time around this much but I don't know why they keep changing the time around this much but I don't know why they keep changing the time around...

I kind of see where you are coming from, but doesn't it make a difference WHY somebody is offended?

If I, for eclxsmple, use the N-Word, the offence this rightfully causes is rooted in it being used to speak about slaves in the past. I can understand that. I understand why this could hurt black peoples feeling. So I don't use it.

The root of offence on the Paris case seemes to be that some Christian Fundamentalist (wrongly) think that Drag-People imitated the last Supper. Their offence is based in them hating Drags. That is nothing I can emphatize with. So I don't see their offence beeing justified, since It is rooted in hate.

Would they be offended if white males immitated the last supper during the ceremony? Possible, and if so then I'd be interested to hear on what basis, since the scene has been mimiced in pop culture a lot without it causing any offence (on a level that would have made it noticeable to me).

Ao that's the difference. I don't blindly stop to do things the left labels as offensive. But If I understand how and why it causes people harm using phrases or doing things then I might change my behaviour on that base. Not because "the left says so" but because I can emphatize and understand the point. In this case I can do neither.

But aren't more and special cheeper EVs better for the environment? So by preventing of softening the Tariffs on Chinese EVs, BMW etc are helping the environment.

Not out of altruism, sure, but it IS a good example of capitalism working towards a greener world.

Or am I missing something?

What you say is true for 5% of animal feed globaly.

I'm an idiot. I meant the exact opposite and have edited the sentence to make it clear.

Every single couple I know uses the toilet in front of each other.

How do you define success in this logic?

What do you mean by incredible adaptable? We have only existed for a short period of time as species and have been plentiful only for a fraction of that period during, so far, climate conditions that have have worked to our favour.