[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 37 points 3 weeks ago

Here it is lit up!

381

Really happy with how it turned out! Decided to show it off to strangers for now as I haven't given it to him yet and i know he isn't on here. 😆. And it lights up!

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 months ago

Man, BBC really scraping the bottom of the barrel for content here 😄

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 36 points 2 months ago

"I got into paleantology to study animal bones"

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 months ago

If im feeling cheeky and one of my fellow nerd friends mentions a favorite character of theirs, i like to say "oh, that guy from Fortnite?"

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 47 points 3 months ago

Reddit is leaking, lol

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 31 points 3 months ago

Don't push when you shit, hemmorrhoids suck

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 110 points 4 months ago

Who is going to recognize that name as being after a bug though? Only people who they tell, lol

30

Hey Folks, I have a bit of a conundrum that I'm hoping the hive mind can assist with.

I am in the process of learning docker to prep for my migration to Linux, but I have some questions about my filesystem structure. Currently my media files of all types live on a single file-based iSCSI LUN hosted on a QNAP which I connect to from a Windows machine. In my research to see if this would be consistent with best practice, I came to the conclusion that I should create independent NFS shares that the docker containers would connect to individually, rather than serving the files to the containers through the host and it's iSCSI connection.

This leads to my problem.

I can't seem to find any way to directly copy data from the LUN to one of my newly created NFS shares. With the volume of data I'll need to copy I'm trying to avoid as much overhead as possible, and using my Windows machine to connect to the new NFS share, then transferring the files from the iSCSI share, would be ludicrously inefficient.

As I'm able to SSH into my NAS, my first thought was to try and mount the iSCSI file locally and rsync the contents directly to the NFS share. After finding the home of the iSCSI file in the NAS filesystem, I discovered that it is not stored as a single, mountable file, but broken up into 1TB chunks. This leaves me unable to mount it, even in part, as each of the files lack an identifiable filesystem. Further, this is my largest partition, and so I don't (currently) have the space to attempt to concatenate the files into a single file (assuming that would even work, no idea).

After giving up on this approach, I decided to try and log into it's own external iSCSI target (from the NAS), then mount the LUN as I would from an external client. I thought I might be in the clear, as the login was successful, and both iscsiadm and the NAS GUI showed the active session to itself. But no matter where I looked I could see no evidence of a newly available partition, only those that were there from before I connected to the iSCSI target.

At this point the next step seems to be shrinking the partition and trying to concatenate the iSCSI files as I mentioned earlier. I have the space to play with, but I'll need to convert the volume to thin-provisioned, then shrink the volume, which would likely take foreverrrrrrr. But really, even this option sucks, because I'd prefer to avoid jeopardizing my primary storage volume in changing the provisioning style.

So anyway, after banging my head on it for the last few hours, I decided to step away and do some "rubber ducky debugging" with you guys.

So here are my questions: Is migrating to NFS worth the effort? Would the file concatenation method even work? COULD the loopback iSCSI method work if I do something differently? Any other tricks, or maybe something in the QNAP App Marketplace?

Any assistance welcome, thanks for reading!

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 31 points 5 months ago

I know they havent said what the punishments would be for non-compliance (Fines? Witholding of public services?), but without jail time attached to it, that just tells me the rich folks are gonna pay their way out (as usual), and those without the means are stuck getting totally-not-drafted.

119
[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 27 points 6 months ago

The real question in my mind is who's doing the soundtrack?

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 36 points 6 months ago

Never commit more than one crime at a time

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 25 points 7 months ago

His name wouldn't happen to be Jim?

6
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works to c/weirdwest@lemmy.zip

Didn't see any posts about it in here yet so thought I'd share!

25

I've been considering a switch to Linux for my main rig, which also runs my Plex and associated services. Does anyone have any advice for me regarding distro, tool compatibility, similar tools to consider while switching, gotcha moments, losses in key functionality, etc. Any advice appreciated!

[-] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 29 points 9 months ago

Excuse my ignorance, but if her legal team decided to sue him into the ground, there's virtually nothing he could do about it, right? There's no recourse to protect "the little guy" from being legally bullied? Would his best bet be to find someone willing to work pro bono with potential to countersue for damages?

view more: next ›

PiJiNWiNg

joined 10 months ago