625
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 207 points 2 months ago

Saw an article yesterday interviewing a couple who says they’ll now have to rebuild their beachfront house for the third time, and that their second rebuild wasn’t even finished when Helene sent their house surfing down the street. That their insurance won’t cover it.

I’m flabbergasted that anyone would even consider rebuilding there. You’re lucky to even have insurance – most insurance companies have been fleeing the state.

Here’s a radical idea: don’t rebuild there. This is only going to get worse.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 70 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I built it all the same! Just to show em!

It sank into the swamp...

So, I built a second one! That sank into the swamp...

So I built a third one! That burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp!

But the fourth one stayed up!

Same mentality...

[-] yeahiknow3 43 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Huston is one of the most populated cities in the US and it’s built on a swamp. Everyone acts super surprised when it floods semi-annually, like it’s some kind of tragedy as opposed to basic physics.

Next thing you know Arizona will start complaining that they’ve run out of water. I mean, yes? You’re in the desert. Your choices were to fix the climate, move, or die. Instead you’ve built a gigantic parking lot of a city.

There should be no aid whatsoever for natural disasters that strike predictably on a regular basis. Human beings aren’t dumb animals. We can communicate. Also Florida, Louisiana, and Texas literally voted for global warming. They got what they voted for so what is the issue?

Actions have consequences. We failed to act for a century. That’s how long we’ve known with absolute certainty that the climate was fucked. We put people on the moon, and we went to war with Iraq, but heaven forbid people stop eating meat, driving their precious cars, or taking pleasure cruises. Zero. Pity.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Arizona will start complaining that they’ve run out of water

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/jan/27/arizona-scottsdale-water-cut-off-rio-verde-foothills-drought

Little community refused to connect to the public utility grid. Wanted to live the libertarian, no government, get eaten by bears ideal. Local government they were mooching off for water said "Hey, we actually need this for our community. No more mooching." They could fix the problem by incorporating, but instead they went to the news media.

Worse is the Supreme Court not honoring centuries old treaties in water rights cases for native tribes. These people were promised the land and now the government wants to say the right to water was not part of it.

[-] Dainterhawk999@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Meat? 😶‍🌫😶‍🌫😶‍🌫

load more comments (22 replies)
[-] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 40 points 2 months ago

Or more to the point. If you have the money to build a beachfront house, why are you not building it to be virtually indestructible? Like one of those indestructible monolithic dome homes.

We can build concrete structures that will laugh at hurricanes. We can build them with their living areas raised well above the ground so water can simply flow underneath and around them. Sure, it's more expensive to build this way, but it can be done. And really, I would argue that if you can't afford to build such a home, you simply cannot afford to live right on the beach.

[-] DaPorkchop_@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 months ago

I always wonder what's going on in the heads of Americans when they go to an area notorious for being hit by hurricanes or tornadoes and then decide they should build their house out of basically toothpicks with some plaster. Here in Switzerland, pretty much everything except for maybe a garden shed is poured concrete, and I guarantee that if the folks in Florida or Oklahoma did the same the "devastation" would be comparatively tiny.

[-] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

Europeans never understand why houses are made out of "flimsy" materials in the US.

The simple answer is that your brick and mortar houses would also be completely destroyed by a hurricane or tornado or earthquake.

They're just way more expensive and take longer to rebuild.

The scale of natural disasters in the US is and always has been such that we expect buildings to be demolished by nature from time to time. Europe is a very stable place. The US is not.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

Having a house that is lighter and stronger per pound than brick makes a lot of sense too. Stick frame houses can twist and shift a considerable amount and recover. Twist a brick house and it crumbles.

[-] Tja@programming.dev 7 points 2 months ago

Japan builds skyscrapers that resist 8+ magnitude earthquakes. They are not made of sticks.

[-] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Neat. Show me one made of bricks or concrete.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

We have 3.2+ earthquakes, well, the rate I get alerts I'd estimate every other month on average. 4-5 times a year in a hundred mile radius (what I've got alerts set at). You are correct. Brick is used at most as a facade around here.

[-] shottymcb@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

We don't even issue alerts for anything below magnitude 5. Below 4 can barely be felt, we wouldn't even call that an earthquake here.

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I would only find out on half of them because folks on reddit, mostly new arrivals to the area, would be freaking out "DID YOU FEEL THAT" and those of us who grew up here would be like "what, a truck?". Then I set up the google alert and you know.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 months ago

I mistook a 4.0 for a plane flying over once. I am directly under an air road or whatever ya want to call it, ive seen everything from a B-29 to an Osprey.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

How arrogant of you.

Florida is a little different than Switzerland, not least due to weather and poverty. There indeed ARE fully concrete and hemp-crete type homes (many styles of homes), but they are unpopular (but becoming more popular) because they trap damp (Florida is extremely humid, unlike Switzerland), grow mold, don't breathe, and cause sickness. Since 2005, all newly built homes are required to have concrete and rebar at certain areas including windows and doors.

https://www.etr-aw.com/full-concrete-homes/

They also are prone to cracking due to shifting. The lower blocks can absorb water, either through these cracks or cracks in waterproofing like paint, and then leak with every heavy rain. Cement (a component of concrete) is one of the largest CO2 emitters in its production, and cement dust is carcinogenic. Concrete houses that are flooded (eyewitnesses report up to 25-50feet of water height) will have to be gutted and possibly torn down anyway once flooded, since the flooding itself ruins everything and makes it unsafe. Since you'll have to gut the whole thing anyway, may as well use wood which can be replaced more easily.

Tornados (since you mentioned Oklahoma) can punch a 2x4 board through a concrete wall. Concrete isn't a Kevlar vest house against all weather types and it isn't an ideal material either for building in every climate.

If the people who were flooded had stayed because they had concrete houses, even more would have died, but instead drowned in a concrete box. This was a storm that needed evacuation.

[-] Dainterhawk999@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Florida is extremely humid, unlike Switzerland, grow mold, don't breathe, and cause sickness.

Concrete houses are still being made in the humid regions near the equator and will still be made in the long future... As for the mold problem, the houses are made such that water seepage is minimised heavily.

Don't wooden houses have the problem of termites making big joint families of their siblings?

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

And full concrete houses are made in Florida currently. But the original question was why do some people prefer wood houses to concrete in Florida - and I gave a long list. Yes there are pros and cons to many materials. That's not really the original question though, which was asked pretty insensitively and condescendingly in a thread about a very recent, ongoing disaster where they are still finding bodies.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dsilverz@thelemmy.club 8 points 2 months ago

they trap damp (Florida is extremely humid, unlike Switzerland), grow mold, don't breathe, and cause sickness

Hi. Brazilian here. A very humid country where I live. Here, almost all houses are made of brick and concrete, even near the seashore. There are even entire concrete buildings near Brazilian beaches (such as Rio de Janeiro, Santos, Salvador, Recife, Porto Alegre, Florianópolis and so on) as well as near rivers (such as Manaus and even at the capital, Brasília). Indeed, mold is a thing, a thing that needs constant cleaning. Wall painting does a role in protecting from mold buildup.

We don't exactly have hurricanes (because it's scientifically a thing from the northern hemisphere) but we do have tornadoes and strong winds very often. We have hailstorms. However, there are very old houses and buildings still standing since 1800, centennial houses.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ours@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I've lived in the Caribbean. Well-off people lived in reinforced concrete buildings not in flood areas. Worst that usually happened is some broken window.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I used to live in Charleston SC and my boss owned a beach home on Folly Beach - one of two houses there that survived Hurricane Hugo in 1989. It survived because it was elevated on massive concrete pilings that extended 60' down to bedrock. When it was built in the 1970s it was two streets back from the beach; after Hugo it was beachfront property.

My dumbass boss (a Rush Limbaugh fan, no surprise) had it torn down despite its being in perfect condition because it was too small (it was "just" a two-bedroom, two-bathroom, one-story layout). He built a much larger, conventional foundation house on the lot, which was apparently badly damaged by Hurricane Matthew in 2016, although it apparently survived and has been repaired. Just a matter of time ...

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 38 points 2 months ago

I was just driving around the beaches of Pinellas County (Tampa Bay area) today. Entire neighborhoods are destroyed. Beach front condos, restaurants and stores, also destroyed. In many areas, anything ground level got flooded/wrecked by storm surge. I saw several boats in places there are not supposed to be boats.

If Tampa Bay takes a direct hit right now it's going to be really fuckin bad for a lot of people.

What's also scary is that right now everyone has been piling up debris, ruined appliances and all manor of belongings outside for disposal. Piles ten feet high along every street. All this shit is about to be flying around in hurricane force winds and storm surge. Is a recipe for disaster.

[-] TheRealLinga@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 months ago

That's terrifying... I hope you and your family are able to get somewhere safe for the time being

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 33 points 2 months ago

They also had sunk all their savings into that rebuild. How do you think about trying a third time when you have nothing to even work with?

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 44 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

this might be a shock, but: in florida there are a lot of stupid people with a lot of money but don't know what the fuck they're doing with money

these people likely also bought spray painted gold sneakers not too long ago

[-] yeahiknow3 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The best way to prepare yourself psychologically for the next fifty years of ecological catastrophe is to cling to this fact and save your pity for people who matter.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 25 points 2 months ago

Yeah, I don’t get it, except the couple I saw (maybe you saw the same interview, there seem to be several of these) acted like this is just a bad year for weather and they ‘don’t want to think’ about climate change. They at least seem the type who don’t think it’s real.

I feel for rescue units who can’t leave, and who will likely be rescuing these stubborn cunts when the next massive storm of the year hits them.

[-] yeahiknow3 8 points 2 months ago

Honestly this is great news because then I don’t have to feel bad about them. Kinda uplifting actually.

[-] cybervseas@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Get more people to donate to your GoFundMe campaign, I guess?

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago
[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 15 points 2 months ago

We’ve been using the sunk cost fallacy for too long to give up on it now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] kat_angstrom@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Sunk Coast Fallacy

[-] YtA4QCam2A9j7EfTgHrH@infosec.pub 28 points 2 months ago

I don’t know if this is the case for that couple, but a lot of insurance requires that you rebuild on the same location. We need to change laws so that this isn’t the case anymore. It is a massive problem.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I mean, you can probably build a house that can reliably survive the conditions there. It's just gonna be really expensive and may not look all that pretty.

It's gonna have to handle water up to a certain height and wind-blown debris smashing into it.

Like, think of a lighthouse or flak tower or something.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lighthouse

Sometimes a lighthouse needs to be constructed in the water itself. Wave-washed lighthouses are masonry structures constructed to withstand water impact, such as Eddystone Lighthouse in Britain and the St. George Reef Light of California. In shallower bays, Screw-pile lighthouse ironwork structures are screwed into the seabed and a low wooden structure is placed above the open framework, such as Thomas Point Shoal Lighthouse. As screw piles can be disrupted by ice, steel caisson lighthouses such as Orient Point Light are used in cold climates. Orient Long Beach Bar Light (Bug Light) is a blend of a screw pile light that was converted to a caisson light because of the threat of ice damage. Skeletal iron towers with screw-pile foundations were built on the Florida Reef along the Florida Keys, beginning with the Carysfort Reef Light in 1852.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flak_tower

With concrete walls up to 3.5 m (11 ft) thick, their designers considered the towers to be invulnerable to attack by the standard ordnance carried by RAF heavy bombers at the time of their construction.

The Soviets, in their assault on Berlin, found it difficult to inflict significant damage on the flak towers, even with some of the largest Soviet guns, such as the 203 mm M1931 howitzers.

After the war, the demolition of the towers was often considered not feasible and many remain to this day, with some having been converted for alternative use.

[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

Living in a lighthouse sounds great. If you open windows at the top it’ll pull air up through the whole structure for cooling.

[-] Sabata11792@ani.social 7 points 2 months ago

It would be cool, but you would also have to contend with the rest of Florinda.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I mean a flak tower could be pretty badass to live in. If shit ever hit the fan you'd already be fortified. It would probably look good to an insurer too.

[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I think I had seen this on lemmy first, that they turned one of the flak towers into a hotel.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Buy me a flak tower in Berlin daddy. Rescue me... and my wife and cats.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

only if it comes with the original flak guns and a good supply of ammo.

Need something to keep those damn kids off my grass.

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

So listen, those flak guns don't aim below the horizon, so you're going to need to modify those. Don't want you going in blind. Like as blind as you would quickly be shooting flak at close range.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Its not about being effective.

its about sending a message.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

Good point, thanks!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

At least don't fucking rebuild it the same way, with the same materials, as the last half dozen times.

Sink some footings down deep, cast the walls out of concrete (you can still put fancy shit up on the concrete to make it look nice, but the concrete will be a fuckton stronger against wind/water/etc)

[-] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 8 points 2 months ago

I know some people from Clearwater and I think they’d just say “this is our community and our home”. It doesn’t make logical sense, but I’d say a lot about the town a person decides to live in is emotional over practical (unless you move somewhere for a job).

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

Well it might be where you live but there ain't gonna be any home or community there much longer

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2024
625 points (98.8% liked)

News

23600 readers
3499 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS