315
submitted 6 months ago by gedaliyah@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

It’s clear that companies are currently unable to make chatbots like ChatGPT comply with EU law, when processing data about individuals. If a system cannot produce accurate and transparent results, it cannot be used to generate data about individuals. The technology has to follow the legal requirements, not the other way around.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 70 points 6 months ago

I have an unusual name. There is one other person in the U.S. with my name and there is something even more unique about them. I typed "Tell me about [MY NAME]." into ChatGPT, including my middle initial just to be sure and got this back:

[MY NAME] is an American entrepreneur, author, and business consultant known for his expertise in marketing and business strategy. He has authored several books on entrepreneurship, marketing, and personal development, aiming to empower individuals to achieve success in their ventures.

[MY NAME] is recognized for his practical approach to business growth and his ability to simplify complex concepts into actionable steps. He often emphasizes the importance of innovation, adaptability, and effective communication in building successful businesses.

While specific details may vary depending on recent developments, [MY NAME]'s work typically revolves around helping entrepreneurs and small business owners navigate the challenges of starting and growing their ventures in today's competitive market landscape. His insights and strategies often focus on leveraging technology, understanding consumer behavior, and developing effective branding and marketing strategies.

[MY NAME] may also engage in public speaking engagements, workshops, and consulting services to share his knowledge and insights with a wider audience. His work likely continues to inspire and empower aspiring entrepreneurs and business professionals to pursue their goals with confidence and determination.

Not one bit of that is true either for me or for the other person who shares my first and last name but not my middle initial.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 64 points 6 months ago

This is the problem with training LLMs on Reddit. It doesn’t know how to say “I don’t know”. So, like Redditors…. It just makes shit up.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 47 points 6 months ago

It's not that it doesn't know how to say "I don't know". It simply doesn't know. Period. LLMs are not sentient and they don't think about the questions they are asked, let alone if the answer they provide is correct. They string words together. That's all. That we've gotten those strings of words to strongly resemble coherent text is very impressive, but it doesn't make the program intelligent in the slightest.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 6 months ago

What amazes me is that people don't find it significant that they don't ask questions. I would argue there is no such thing as intelligence without curiosity.

[-] reev@sh.itjust.works -2 points 6 months ago

What do you even mean with that? Pi asks questions and certainly feels curious and engaged in conversation. Even chatgpt will ask for more information if it doesn't find the requested information in, for example, an Excel spreadsheet you upload.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 22 points 6 months ago

They're trained on far more than reddit. But it's not a training data problem, it's a wrong tool problem. It's called "generative AI" for a reason: it generates text, same way a Markov chain does. You want it to tell you something, it'll tell you. You want factual data, don't ask a storyteller.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What I think is especially funny though is that both the other person and myself have done enough (not horrific) things in our lives to have things like mainstream media mentions but it still got it entirely wrong.

I'm not famous but it definitely should have known who I am.

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 months ago

How can a Flying Squid not be famous? Haven't the tonight show contacted you about doing aerobatics?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago
[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

I thought I knew you from somewhere. That was gonna bother me all day.

[-] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

But we know everything, why would we say otherwise when we are always the smartest person in every room we've ever walked into? What even is this foreign tongue 'I don't know'. I've never heard of it before. Is it latin?

[-] Eranziel@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

If an LLM had to say "I don't know" when it doesn't know, that's all it would be allowed to say! They literally don't know anything. They don't even know what knowing means. They are complex (and impressive, admittedly) text generators.

[-] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 months ago

I congratulate you, and think you should be proud of overcoming your inherent invertebrate self, to not only be a prolific poster on Lemmy, but also to be an entrepreneur, author, and business consultant.

Truly you are one in a squidillion.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

Thank you. You can take my new business course for only $399.95 and a bucket full of any small species of saltwater fish you can find.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 4 points 6 months ago

a bucket full of any small species of saltwater fish you can find.

LOL

[-] Gonzako@lemmy.world 6 points 6 months ago

So your work revolves around bringing entrepreneurs down?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

In the sense that it would bring them down if they found out that I couldn't spend money on their business because I'm not working? I suppose.

[-] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

I am also unique-except-one. Mine is similarly unrecognizable.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 2 points 6 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Whichever free one you can use by going to their website, but considering anything it would know about me would come from at least 13 or 14 years ago, that shouldn't be an issue.

If you search my name on pretty much any search engine, a bunch of links come up.

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 6 months ago

The paid version is better at least in this respect.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 1 points 6 months ago

I just checked and someone by my unusual name apparently retired in 1986 after a storied career. I was in about 8th grade. When I provided more particulars, it just said I'm too obscure. Which isn't terribly surprising. I should turn up on searches, but I'm a fairly private person and avoid any sort of publicity.

I couldn't find any specific information about a [redacted] born in [redacted]. It's possible there may be limited public information available about this individual. If you have any additional details or context that could help narrow down the search, please let me know!

That being said, it was running Bing searches on me so that's probably on the search engine and not the AI.

I did run into someone with my exact same name and married to a woman with my wife's first name at an out of state niche conference of maybe 300 people. It caused quite a bit of confusion with the hotel booking. That was surreal because it was the first time ever running into someone with my last name that wasn't family. Anyway, apparently both of us are completely off the radar, which is good because I'd hate for him to have turned into a career criminal or something.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
315 points (97.3% liked)

News

23301 readers
3560 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS