612
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by Theprogressivist@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

A conservative plan for Donald Trump’s potential transition into the presidency calls for dozens of prisoners to be executed, according to HuffPost. An 887-page plan by Project 2025, led by the ultra-conservative Heritage Foundation, says that if elected, Trump should make a concerted effort to execute the remaining 40 prisoners on death row. The section’s author, attorney Gene Hamilton, advised that Trump “do everything possible to obtain finality” on the current list of people until Congress forces them to stop. Hamilton is the vice president of America Legal First, a group of former Trump lawyers bent on attacking “woke” companies, headed by Stephen Miller. Trump’s approach to the death penalty stands in stark contrast to that of President Joe Biden, who has openly opposed the death penalty, but done little to move forward legislation to reform or abolish the practice since entering office.

For those of you not in the know Project 2025 is Republicans plan to turn the USA into an authoritarian state.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 63 points 6 months ago

They want blood. No matter the route. If I can ask anything of my fellow liberals is that you arm yourselfs. I'm not saying we take to the streets with weapons. I'm saying we should all be prepared for the absolute insanity that may ensue if he actually wins

[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 38 points 6 months ago

When the nazis came to power, they forcibly took away the guns of their victims. They'd send a squad of SS to your house, surround it, and force you to give up the gun. If you didn't, they'd kill you, if you did, they still got you in the end.

Some of their victims hid, refused to give up their arms, and fought back. They didn't survive.

If guns were the answer to dealing with fascism and authoritarianism, germany never would have had the holocaust.

[-] General_Effort@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

The first thing the nazis did, was purge the bureaucracy. Taking away guns was no concern, at all.

Privately owned guns played no significant role in the nazis' rise to or hold on power. Anything else is simply marketing by american gun sellers.

Some of their victims hid, refused to give up their arms, and fought back. They didn’t survive.

About 10-15,000 jewish germans survived the holocaust by going underground in Germany. They were colloquially called U-Boote or Illegale. Of course, that has nothing to do with guns. Guns were, after all, handed out to any able-bodied male.

If guns were the answer to dealing with fascism and authoritarianism, germany never would have had the holocaust.

That is only partly true. Germans are only a small fraction of holocaust victims (<5%). The victims overwhelmingly came from eastern Europe, particularly Poland and the Soviet Union. The holocaust happened in the wake of the advancing Wehrmacht. A more far-sighted response to german war preparations would have made a difference. A lesson one must bear in mind in today's world.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 14 points 6 months ago

Yeah, it's a fucking joke to assume that guns are a hedge against fascism. They'll take your guns or shoot you. Maybe there's some protection in being an organised group in the moment, but if they want to get you they'll get you.

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago
[-] antidote101@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Whilst members of the Weaver family were illegally killed by the government at Ruby Ridge, what's less known is that Randy Weaver was hanging out with people from the Aryan Nation movement, and a believer in the Posse Comitatus theory of law.

It was White Nationalists that later erased these facts to promote the Weaver's story as they (rightly) believed it would inspire others into their life style.

Timothy McVeigh cited the story as one of the reasons for his bombing of a federal government building and its daycare centre.

https://www.splcenter.org/hatewatch/2022/05/13/randy-weaver-influential-figure-white-supremacist-militia-movements-has-died

[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago

Oh I certainly wasn’t defending him or the white supremacist community he was a part of.

I was also tempted to mention Wako and the Davidians.

My point was, no matter how many guns you have, the machine will always win in a gun fight.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 months ago

Part of the reason the Nazis didnt face too much resistance is because a possible major for of resistance got purged before their rise. The Spartacists got purged pretty thoroughly by the Freikorps who also used it as an excuse to purge other similar groups.

Also guns would be one of many different tools in such a resistance scenario, alongside things like car bombs and just stabbing people. Its just convenient to have a long range weapon that requires little training, mind you stealing a gun or manufacturing one would also be viable i guess.

[-] havocpants@lemm.ee 28 points 6 months ago

There will be insanity if he's allowed to run at all.

There should be no way for people to participate in a democracy they have attempted to overthrow, and these fuckers are absolutely going to try again. It will be a shitshow. I hope the US justice system comes through, but it will be a very dangerous time for America if Trump and his cronies are not prosecuted for their crimes before the next election.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago

I have some bad news.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

Even if Trump gets prosecuted for 1/6 before the election, there is ZERO chance it's completed before the election. There will be appeals carrying it on for YEARS.

That being said too, there's nothing in the charges that would disqualify him on conviction. There SHOULD BE, but there isn't.

Ideally I'd like to see Congress get their shit together and get a Constitutional amendment that says "Convicted felons are inelligible".

That would solve the problem right there. Convict him in the Stormy Daniels case, problem solved.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

No, I don't think it would be good to strip felons of their ability to be president. People who protest too hard can get felonies. People who steal too many diapers and infant formula for their kids ($2k worth, which is lower threshold every year due to inflation) can get felonies. The felony system is deeply corrupt. We should restore felon's right to vote.

We need to fix the issues that elect someone deeply unpopular like Trump in the first place - like gerrymandering and uneven delegates. A vote should just be a vote. We should have approval voting (similar to ranked choice). More fascism isn't the answer.

[-] irreticent@lemmy.world 18 points 6 months ago

we should all be prepared for the absolute insanity that may ensue if he actually wins

We should also all be prepared for the absolute insanity that will ensue if he loses. I fear we will have a more violent insurrection this time around and maybe even local violence in some areas.

[-] whereisk@lemmy.world 19 points 6 months ago

Nah, without control of the levers of government they're just terrorists. Don't forget that the government was well warned about Jan 6, and Trump's team actively suppressed preparation and response. It's not going to be the same if Biden is in office.

[-] Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

There will be no local violence. His supporters are riding rascals through Walmart, the few that could participate will turn and run when shit gets real, just like 1/6

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I'm not saying we take to the streets with weapons

Then you're doing nothing but shilling for the gun lobby, who immediately donate millions to the worst Republicans.

If you're going to advocate guns, you should be willing to tell people what to use them for.

[-] unreasonabro@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

I mean that's a pretty stupid thing to say considering everyone knows you'll get your comment removed and probably also your account banned for explaining what should actually be done, what should actually be being done, right now. Maybe eventually everyone will get mad enough that mods will stop standing in the way of what needs to happen, but by then they'll have pulled the plug on the internet anyway..

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 months ago

Maybe eventually everyone will get mad enough that mods will stop standing in the way of what needs to happen

It’s a federated platform, if you feel like the mods are standing in the way then leave to another instance.

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

What a joke you are. Are we actually supposed to pretend your guns are more than cosplay props when you're not even willing to risk being banned from anonymous social media to advocate your cause?

Well I'm not scared of being banned, so take your guns and your pro-gun astroturfing and fuck off.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

A highly public series of rapid-fire executions gives Trump some very immediate media "wins".

And when you review the list of death row inmates its easy to see how conservatives can twist any objection to execution as endorsement of police slayings, carjackings, kidnappings, and child murder.

Right-wing news will have a field day announcing "Daniel Troya, the man who murdered an entire family in cold blood JUST GOT HIS DAY OF JUSTICE!" with swooping infographics and blaring trumpets. Drag on some Project Veritas stooge with B-roll footage of a crying pink haired college kid and topping it off with "WOKE LIBERALS ARE SO OWNED!" and you'll have a fascist feeding frenzy.

I’m saying we should all be prepared for the absolute insanity that may ensue if he actually wins

Real Helms Deep Hours.

[-] elbarto777@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago
this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
612 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19103 readers
3450 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS