235
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago

This is the same guy that Republicans cheered because he called for the eradication of trans people.

He is a piece of shit, hence his popularity with other pieces of shit.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Ah yes. Newton's Turd Law.

[-] ech@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

"A shit in motion will draw in other shit, building into a tsunami of shit if not acted upon"

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 53 points 1 year ago

Wait, if I, as a straight cis guy, find myself in the vicinity of a pride event what crime am I guilty of? In fact, what constitutes a pride event? My son is gay. Should everyone that attended his graduation be arrested? What if he had a rainbow on his hat?

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

Should everyone that attended his graduation be arrested?

Only if you were proud of his accomplishments.

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 32 points 1 year ago
[-] ericisshort@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

~~Straight~~ Gay to jail.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Eventually having a gay son will be a crime in his eyes.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure "eventually" is right now. He believes people are gay because they're groomed to be.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There seems to be a pattern where the most outspoken anti-gay people are actually themselves in the closet. Should make a law that it's illegal to hide if you're gay, then just arrest anyone that wants to enforce it.

[-] fubo@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Show me what fascism looks like

[-] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Michael Knowles, of the conservative publication The Daily Wire

There it is.

[-] sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ok seriously, who the fuck are these chucklefucks that keep getting into the news cycle??

I keep hearing about a new “right wing pundit” every week, are they being made in a factory?

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago

Maybe if these fascist ball sacks were always met with a volley of rotten vegetables every time they showed their disgusting faces they'd crawl back to the sewers where they belong.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Pretty much. If you have few to no morals and don't mind risking getting punched in the face when out in public then you could be a right wing pundit.

Not gonna lie, it seems like a pretty easy racket if you have no morals.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they're being cloned. contrary to popular belief, the bigotry is by design rather than an accidental mutation.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 27 points 1 year ago

I wanna hit him in the face with a brick. We don't all get what we want.

[-] vivavideri@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It'd be a really good look for him, getting hit with a brick.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Frankly speaking I wanna do it with a sticky grenade thats been modified to just release a lot of liquid ass.

[-] dragonflyteaparty@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Wait, hold on. I didn't realize everyone at pride events were taking their tits out and giving hand jobs. When did that happen?

[-] Cabrio@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Gaslight. Obstruct. Project.

The institution got blind sided by family values fondler boebert and are behind the wave on their propaganda.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

What a piece of shit

[-] drunkenmonkie2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Why do people listen to this cartoon rat looking motherfucker?

[-] PostmodernPythia@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Don’t insult Scabby like that. Cartoon rats are way better looking than this douche canoe.

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The side of free speech strikes again

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 10 points 1 year ago

Sucking a dick in public is far more indecent than wearing leather, feathers, rainbows and lace. What a piece of shit.

[-] Dick_Justice@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only thing they have are whataboutisms.

[-] who8mydamnoreos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Why does this pervert care so much how people get off?

[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

would be a shame if his suit got covered in a bucket of toilet slop.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Isn't that official platform of the Republican party?

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago
this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
235 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4483 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS