560
submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Despite Americans paying nearly double that of other nations, the US fares poorly in list of 10 countries

The United States health system ranked dead last in an international comparison of 10 peer nations, according to a new report by the Commonwealth Fund.

In spite of Americans paying nearly double that of other countries, the system performed poorly on health equity, access to care and outcomes.

"I see the human toll of these shortcomings on a daily basis," said Dr Joseph Betancourt, the president of the Commonwealth Fund, a foundation with a focus on healthcare research and policy.

...

The fund said the US would need to expand insurance coverage and make “meaningful” improvements on the amount of healthcare expenses patients pay themselves; minimize the complexity and variation in insurance plans to improve administrative efficiency; build a viable primary care and public health system; and invest in social wellbeing, rather than thrust problems of social inequity onto the health system.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 1 month ago

But the US system ranks first in wealth extraction from people to billionaires, so it’s working as intended.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 83 points 1 month ago

Shocking. "Best health care system in the world," my ass. "You'll have to wait months if there's universal healthcare." Bitch, I have to wait months now.

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

“You’ll have to wait months if there’s universal healthcare.”

Yeah, but that healthcare is still practically guaranteed, and it won't put you into debt

[-] PlasticExistence@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

Several times I've had to wait for months on healthcare in the US system. This is such a weak argument against a socialized system.

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Literally anything I want done is a wait list here. Eye exam; schedule a time. Dentist; is it an emergency? We'll schedule you sometime next month. Phycologist; its a theee month wait list. Primary care; see you in three months. Finding a reliable primary care has been a dead end nightmare.

I'm not shitting on doctors or nurses. Just this whole system is bonkers. For what reason? Healthcare is not a business.

"In capitalism everything's a buisness." Well get fucked.

I'm not saying we should be reductive. There is reasons for the way we do things. I am saying though, we've gone too far and it's obscuring the goal of a having a functional society.

People need professionals to help with their health; an extremely complex field. Every person needs this. Its not an optional thing. You want a society, well a society needs people, and people need Healthcare.

"Well I never wanted to be part of a society." Did you enjoy the luxury that having a society provides? From plumbing to super yatchs, all of this wealth we share was made by people like you and me.

[-] optissima@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

There is reasons for the way we do things.

Because a rich class keeps oppressing the poorer class, not because it's a good way to do things.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Who has ever said that? You guys have no healthcare. It's literally a joke to anyone outside of US.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

Our politicians and pundits say it all the time.

[-] Paddzr@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Not a high bar if they're also saying immigratns are eating People's pets.

[-] theilleists@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

But you have to understand, to 74 million people, the Fox News Cinematic Universe is reality. There's regular bullshit, and then there's bullshit so widely believed that you actually have to study the bullshit, just to be able to predict what its subscribers will do next. Like religion.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 month ago

You're wrong but not in the way you think. It's also a joke to everyone inside the US, except billionaires. Billionaires love it

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] thesohoriots@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

My insurance bumped up the copay on primary care to make it less affordable than an urgent care visit, incentivizing us to get care with immense surcharges. But at least we can get a same-day appointment instead of waiting a month or two to see the most qualified and familiar person with our conditions. Fuck capitalism, as usual.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I had my primary care doctor retire. The gigantic hospital system with which they work put all existing patients in as new patients for the incoming doctor. It has been 18 months and I'm still waiting for the new patient visit. Fighting to even get maintainance medications filled has been crazy because I keep being told "I have to see my doctor." Circular logic abounds.

The gigantic system makes it so I cannot directly contact the office, it is all hurry up and wait through their patient portal systems which require 24-48 hours for response time. Can't go to the doctors office to complain without an appointment.

This system is working optimally for someone. It is not us.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My wife broke her ankle and insurance denied the entire claim for being "not medically necessary". The "medical professional" (not doctor) who denied the claim had experience in OBGYN, not orthopedics.

100% going to win the appeal because like, we have x-rays of the shattered bones in her leg, but seriously wtf. People seriously believe this is the ideal medical system?

[-] evasive_chimpanzee@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago

Cigna doctors spend an average of 1.2 seconds per case. Their whole system is to deny everything right off the bat, and then they only have to potentially pay out for patients who have the resources to appeal.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 13 points 1 month ago

When I was in the insurance industry, for a company who administered various policies from Aetna, BCBS, Cigna, United and Medicare, that was the SOP. Deny anything that took more than a few seconds of brain power, put clients through endless rounds of appeals. The medical director was amoral AF too, because well, the insurance company exists for profit, and bonuses are dependent on paying out as little as possible. It got pretty bad, too, enough that my immediate supervisor started signing off a bunch of approvals, circumventing the medical director, where any shred of plausibility was available.

Now, there is automated software. HIPAA has it's pros and cons.

[-] r00ty@kbin.life 3 points 1 month ago

Oh, I read this John Grisham book.

[-] ArmoredThirteen@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

I'm on appeal #3 right now with my insurance for something they told me would be 100% covered. I'm getting my doctor in on it to do a peer to peer. He sounded so fed up with everything he was like "it's probably some retired pediatrician who doesn't know anything about what you need" when talking about who he'd need to talk with. If this one doesn't work then I'm on to the "threaten to sue" stage which I'm not excited about. The whole thing is a mess and the process and money that's gone into it would have easily bankrupted or put me homeless at most previous times in my life

[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I'm not a lawyer, but a piece of legal advice I've seen repeated many times is "Never threaten to sue. Just sue."

As soon as you threaten to sue, you'll never be able to talk to anybody except the legal team, and they'll do nothing to help your case.

[-] LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's honestly infuriating that these companies are essentially diagnosing and treating patients without doctor-patient relationship (required by federal law). And like LITERALLY determining and dictating treatment. That's illegal if ANYONE else does it. Even if your own medical provider doesn't see you per new condition, that can be considered a violation of that law. And these insurance guys have never seen us in real life.

I also think that it's a really strangely allowed violation of HIPPA. Why should everyone at the insurance company, or ANYONE at an insurance company, have the right to my medical information? Why are they able to communicate with my doctor's office? I absolutely hate the privacy aspect of insurance so much.

[-] sevan@lemmy.ca 32 points 1 month ago

It's helpful to know that if I ever leave the US, I'll have better healthcare. I don't even need to spend any time researching that aspect.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago

Universal healthcare paid from the taxes of the wealthy. Cmon. Asking for a few million friends. 😣

[-] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 month ago

My family and I moved from the US to Canada in the summer of 2023 and last week was the first time I had to make use my Services Card. I went to the ER in excruciating pain, had blood and urine labs done, a shot of pain killers then waited around (a long time) for a CT scan. The doctor said it might be a new record, but I had been bumped a few times by suspected stroke patients that came in, so totally understandable. Several hours later with a prescription slip in hand I exited the hospital. Easy as pie.

For anyone who has never had the displeasure of experiencing an American hospital you can not understand how much simpler and less stressful and cheap the Canadian system is. I dont know what it would have cost me in the USA, probably whatever my insurance deductible was, but it certainly was not $0. That state of not knowing what all this is going to cost you, and how you will afford it, makes an already awful experience even worse. Not being harassed for money on the way out, never once discussing the cost of something with the DR was truly eye opening. Source

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Some people achieve some sadistic satisfaction from denying poor people health care, even if it cost extra to themselves!?
In USA there is a sentiment that looks like they are trying to exterminate the poor, by letting them suffer and die, instead of trying to build a better more humane society for all.

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

There's a lot of miserable fucks out there due to a mix of leaded gas fumes, childhood trauma, and religious/political brainwashing.

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

To me, its much more that the rich don't want to pay for the healthcare of the people who earn all of their money for them, rather than active sadism.

More, devoid of empathy and not really seeing them as fellow humans, deserving of basic rights like not dying of poverty. Especially if it costs them money.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 month ago

Turns out a profit motive is not the best system for everything in the world. Who would have guessed?

[-] Eximius@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It would probably be fine if everyone agreed to play by the rules, but they dont, and the US is terrible at enforcing them (or specifically, chooses not too, and doesnt impose new laws to stop loopholing)

But the administrative bullshit, and the other potential problems are exactly why other countries went for universal healthcare 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The U.S. health care system is a failure because of the continued existence of health insurance companies over the more streamlined approach of Medicare for All.

Also this graph is hilarious, albeit depressing.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Resand@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

No no no, that's simply wrong.

US healthcare system is the best in the world, at doing what it's designed to do. Issue here is that they're measuring it on care provide vs cost, while the US system is optimized for profits.

If they instead ranked the results by which system generated the most private profits the US would be first.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The line I've heard is

best in the world for those who can afford it

But medicine is still an industry that benefits from economy of scale. It still benefits from public sector R&D. It still benefits from robust safety regulations and enforcement of best practices.

We've been chipping away at all of that. Hell, we're straight up closing hospitals and clinics all over the country, purely because so few of them are economically viable when pitted against a ruthless private insurance market.

If they instead ranked the results by which system generated the most private profits

There are sectors that bring in big profits, but they're extracting those profits from the sectors that deliver the medicine.

The snake is eating it's own tail. This isn't a long term strategy for profit. Every quarterly cycle leans harder on Medicaid and Medicare as the private systems fail.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago

"Yeah, but Socialism and Communism!!!"

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago

I mean I can hope, but it seems unlikely

[-] Chef_Boyardee@lemm.ee 11 points 1 month ago

Oh yeah? We still have more guns.

/s

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 11 points 1 month ago

Israel can afford universal healthcare. But the United States? Where would we ever find the money for that?

[-] undergroundoverground@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The UK did it immediately after WW2 when our economy was destroyed. We were in much debt, we didn't finish paying America back until 2006. However, apparently, the country we paid all that money to cant afford it?

You have to admire the brazennes of the lie though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

This sounds like a health system Trump would love!!!!

[-] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

How far down the list of non-peer nations are we?

[-] Hapankaali@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago

For a laugh (and cry), you can have a look at which countries are above the US in terms of life expectancy. It includes the likes of Maldives, Costa Rica, Panama and Oman.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 7 points 1 month ago

Pretty far down

[-] raker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

The goal has been reached

[-] Iampossiblyatwork@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Eh, but how do we rank if you are flush with disposable income?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
560 points (99.1% liked)

News

23284 readers
3505 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS