this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2023
292 points (97.4% liked)

News

27971 readers
5430 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Senate passed a resolution Wednesday to make business attire a requirement on the Senate floor.

The moves comes after backlash to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer's (D-N.Y.) directive to scuttle the chamber's informal dress code, which was widely viewed to be inspired by Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.).

The bipartisan resolution requires that business attire be worn on the floor of the Senate, "which for men shall include a coat, tie, and slacks or other long pants."

The bill does not spell out what the attire includes for women.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 212 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm so glad the country doesn't have any actual problems that need to be addressed so the Senate can afford to spend time on nonsense like this.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think you hit the nail on the head with that one. We're facing another Republican engineered government shutdown but what's the #1 priority? Fashion.

[–] Hotdogman@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That doesn't mention female attire...

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

25 senators are women 15 of whom are Democrats (and 1 independent who caucuses with the Democrats) and it was a unanimous vote. Isn't that peculiar?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 110 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yes, let's enforce a classist dress code to remind everyone how classist we are. That'll fix everything.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 30 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It certainly makes it more likely for the rich to be able to go to the senate. Especially if you're an especially big and tall guy like Fetterman who would have to get all of his suits tailor-made.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Yeah it’s basically an attempt to be like the House of Lords in a country without nobility

[–] Spendrill@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago (5 children)

You might not have a nobility but you've sure as shit got an aristocracy. Cabots, Lowells, Hearsts, Kennedys...

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] idiomaddict@feddit.de 13 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Only if you want them to fit. I saw no requirement for that in the memo

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 18 points 2 years ago

It's the Senate, it's intended to be the "upper class."

The rabble is supposed to be in the House of Representatives.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 100 points 2 years ago (11 children)

The tie is the most useless piece of clothing ever invented. It serves no purpose (shut up about the original function, it no longer serves it) except to constrict your airway and dip into your spaghett.

[–] driving_crooner@lemmy.eco.br 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

What was even the original function anyway?

[–] JdW@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago (1 children)

To please King Louis XIII.

During the 30 year war, Croatian mercenaries fought alongside the King in battle. To keep their jackets tied they used a piece of cloth which King Louis XIII took a strong liking to. He made this smart scarf a mandatory accessory for royal gatherings. Paying homage to the Croats who introduced this scarf to him, he named it ‘La Cravate’, which is still the French name for the necktie today.

Over the ages, the cravat has evolved into the modern necktie we wear today. Since their origins in military regiments, they have been a symbol of power and respect. Throughout the 19th century, they swept through the Western world. They were found in most universities, schools, sports clubs and gentlemen clubs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lateraltwo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

The original function of any dress code is always maintained by the aristocracy and adopted by the people to put on the same airs, never the other way around.

[–] octoperson@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It hides your placket. You don't want people walking around with their plackets on show do you?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Sure, cause the ex president with the most federal charges is in business attire and he is an upstanding citizen. Let’s focus on how people look instead of actual issues.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's only ever about appearances with the repubs. They want the appearance of propriety. If they start dressing like their lessers, then The lessers might realize they are equals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bstix@feddit.dk 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Even trump might be out of code, unless high heels are acceptable business attire for men.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 72 points 2 years ago (15 children)

This is what's important to these people. They don't care about millions suffering every day, they don't care about the climate going to shit, they don't care about the economy. They're up in arms because someone might not wear a full suit in their presence. These are your "representatives".

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Delusional@lemmy.world 69 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How about instead of making sure they wear the correct clothing, you make sure they do their god damn fucking job of making life better for the citizens. Because that hasn't been happening for decades now and what they wear while fucking over Americans hardly matters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 63 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Ah yes formal business attire, the universal dress code for those who accomplish nothing while looking very important. Very appropriate

Ya know gym shorts and a t-shirt besides being infinitely more practical and comfortable would lead to confusion with actual hard working Americans who don't have the luxury of getting paid to do nothing.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 63 points 2 years ago

This is the dumbest fucking thing

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 58 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Good thing they're focusing on the important things. Fucking Cunts!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 57 points 2 years ago

Sure seems like they've got a lot of free time over there...

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 52 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Imagine a world without conservatives. Immense wastes of energy and time like this would be a thing of the past.

Conservatism is a disease in need of a cure.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mill_city@lemmy.zip 51 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Gotta look profesh while they're not doing their jobs. It's like they're in competition with that disaster of a House to see which chamber can be the most useless.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 46 points 2 years ago (10 children)

If I was Fetterman, it'd now be my personal pet peeve to subvert this dress code whenever I could by showing up in the most ridiculous-but-formally-correct outfits.

[–] SheDiceToday@eslemmy.es 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yellow ties, mustard green coat, orange slacks?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

Glad they are focused on the important things.

[–] BrikoX@lemmy.zip 35 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Theater is the only thing U.S. Senate is good at. And maybe getting bribed, but that's beside the point.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Sir I must let you know that you are impugning upon the good reputation of cunts everywhere.

[–] TruTollTroll@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So glad they can decide on what to wear instead fixing things to prevent a government shut down ..... phew I was so worried about their priorities there for a moment 😕

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Wahots@pawb.social 31 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Pass a budget. Nobody should be getting paid until then. The 20 republican extremists holding the entire country hostage should be fined exorbitantly every day they refuse to work with everyone to pass a budget.

Fuck stuff like dress codes. I could give less of a shit if everyone was naked, literally doesn't matter vs getting the government properly funded.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ShittyRedditWasBetter@lemmy.world 28 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You know this is just going to result in a pride suit right? I 100% expect him showing up in rainbows. Should bring in cat ears as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is going to help avert a Government shutdown and put millions of people out of work!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 27 points 2 years ago

Crisis averted! Good job senators! I know I'll sleep better now!

[–] Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 years ago

Who cares what people are wearing?

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 20 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Seems blatantly discriminatory on the basis of gender

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago

This is pure classism. They think they are better than us.

[–] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 19 points 2 years ago

These people don't know what the country needs and they don't care. They spend their time and our money making it illegal for people to dress in a way that makes them unhappy. Absolutely fucking useless.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 18 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Kinda weird they had to pass a resolution to overrule Schumer's non-resolution decision, but they did it by unanimous consent so if Schumer (or Fetterman) disagreed they could have stopped it. If Schumer and Fetterman are on board for this, they could have just reversed the earlier decision.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] scripthook@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago

I think lawmakers getting paid during a government shutdown, free healthcare, and only work half the year is more concerning. They get more breaks than I get vacation time at work.

[–] callouscomic@lemm.ee 15 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Literally cannot pass a budget on time for decades though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 13 points 2 years ago

How much did this process cost in taxpayer money?

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

popularity contest for the upper class

[–] OpenPassageways@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This directive seemed like a trap from Schumer which invited Republicans and conservative Democrats to show off how out-of-touch they are with millennials and Gen Z. Looks like they fell for it.

[–] SeaJ@lemm.ee 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

Really doing important work there in the Senate. Putting on a good show of how connected and in touch they are with the people.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments