this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
499 points (99.8% liked)

Canada

9045 readers
2894 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


๐Ÿ’ต Finance, Shopping, Sales


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prime Minister Mark Carney has asked for a review of Canadaโ€™s plan to purchase a fleet of F-35 fighter jets.

The deal with Lockheed Martin and the U.S. government is for 88 planes at a cost of about US$85 million each.

A spokesperson for Defence Minister Bill Blair said Carney has asked Blair to look into whether the F-35 contract is the best investment for Canada, or if there are better options.

โ€œWe need to do our homework given the changing environment, and make sure that the contract in its current form is in the best interests of Canadians and the Canadian Armed Forces,โ€ Blairโ€™s press secretary Laurent de Casanove said.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Punchshark@lemmy.ca 86 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Fuck yeah! Canada will vote with its dollar!

[โ€“] hikuro93@lemmy.ca 64 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Heck yeah. Go Carney.

With love from Portugal. ๐Ÿ‡ต๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿค๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ

[โ€“] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

Welcome to the carnival!

or

CARNAGE!

[โ€“] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 44 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Can I interest you in a Eurofighter Typhoon?

[โ€“] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 14 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Me personally? I'd love to say yes, but I'm a bit skint atm.....could I get it on IOU?

[โ€“] AFC1886VCC@reddthat.com 5 points 5 days ago

Okay, make some space in the drive and I'll bring it over later.

load more comments (4 replies)
[โ€“] brax@sh.itjust.works 48 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Seems stupid to buy defense resources from a country that could become hostile. Do any European companies have anything to offer? I get that GOS and a lot of resources are still probably going to come from the USA but right now, the less the better.

[โ€“] CircaV@lemmy.ca 37 points 5 days ago (4 children)

It also seems stupid to keep importing on a mass scale the culture, news, entertainment, media, and media platforms of a country that wants to invade Canada. Yet here we are.

[โ€“] fourish@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I would be thrilled if all American social media was blocked 100%. Sweep the trolls back into their caves.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)
[โ€“] slingstone@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I read somewhere they operate with a licensed American engine, and that some European nations are trying to replace it with a non-American one.... Yeah, it's a development of an F-18 engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Canada could do the funniest thing rn by buying J-35s at half the price.

[โ€“] BetaBlake@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It would be funny, but damn I would not want to buy military equipment from china

USA: We want to annex Canada. We are not joking

Canadians: Ooh China is very scary.

[โ€“] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

China is Canada's second biggest trade partner, unless they're planning to follow America to war with China, what's the problem? Especially because it's for a military that was designed for the singular purpose of defending itself from an American invasion over the last 70 years.

The Canadian public isint ready to swallow it yet but that's where it's going to end up at. China and Iran have been preparing for this scenario for the last 20+ years.

They have all the kit and more needed, and in the right quantity too. In time. People still don't really belive Trump would push the button. The closer he gets the more open to this reality people will become.

load more comments (10 replies)
[โ€“] vga@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah, those are definitely safe from tampering.

[โ€“] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

The purpose of buying jets from someone other than America is to reduce America's influence over Canada, why would China sabotage that?

Edit: Why is this controversial? Do you think America tampers with the weapons we send to Taiwan?

[โ€“] homesnatch@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The US can remotely disable an F-35.. China, I'd expect can do the same for a J-35.

[โ€“] wizzor@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think the above poster doubts their ability, only that they might be less incentivized to do so compared to, say a country that has repeatedly voiced their wish to annex Canada.

[โ€“] homesnatch@lemm.ee 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Nobody expects China to remotely disable J-35's on a whim... But they might do it as they prepare to invade Taiwan.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] Tm12@lemmy.ca 31 points 5 days ago

Something we can train on and maintain within our borders please.

[โ€“] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 25 points 5 days ago

He's keeping up decorum but yeah these jets are done. You can't buy military equipment from an enemy and the jets would have to be serviced in the USA over their lifetime.

[โ€“] nao@sh.itjust.works 20 points 5 days ago

maybe don't rely on fighter jets than can possibly be disabled remotely by someone talking about invading you

[โ€“] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It always seemed strange that Canada would agree (how much arm twisting?) to buy a plane that won't work well in our Arctic. We are committed to buying 16 jets but it would probably be better to buy the rest elsewhere or put our money into homegrown solutions. Maybe drones or other machines.

[โ€“] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 days ago

Excuse me sir, may I interest you in Gripen? Cold weather tested, fascist free, and oh so stylish. Book your test flight today!

[โ€“] ikidd@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Maybe we should be looking at what we need for city close quarters defenses and guerilla fighting.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Messing with the military industrial complex is not the smartest move for Trump. All that will do is turn the military against him.

[โ€“] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 16 points 5 days ago

Lockheed Martin โ€” โ€We specialize in destroying the lives of brown people, come fly with usโ€

[โ€“] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Prime Minister Carney, I have several better solutions. Cancel the F-35 and examine the Saab JAS-39 Gripen, Dassault Rafael, or the Eurofighter Typhoon.

[โ€“] xye@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago

Iโ€™m glad youโ€™re doing this, but ultimately sad because love is irrational and I love the F-35.

load more comments
view more: next โ€บ