598
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 284 points 1 year ago

"No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.

Matthew 6:24

[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 108 points 1 year ago

Thank you. The best way to fight this is quoting scripture. Half these chuckles haven’t even seen a bible, let alone know what the words inside say.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago

If any of the chucklefucks actually gave a shit about what the bible says, they'd all be as socialist as Jesus and would've burned Trump at a stake for being the antichrist.

You can't deprogram religious extremists with religion.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 59 points 1 year ago

I'm Jewish, and thus not an expert on Jesus by any means. Still, even I know that Biblical Jesus would be a socialist today, not a Republican.

He gave out free healthcare.

He fed the hungry without charging them.

He hung around people who were on the fringes of society.

He worked against the wealthy.

If Biblical Jesus were to magically appear in modern society, the only reason he would enter a MAGA church would be to flip a few tables.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ChronosWing@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 year ago

It doesn't matter, they pick and choose what they want to believe. If you try throwing scripture at them they just contort themselves into a pretzel trying to explain why that particular scripture is not to be taken literally.

[-] Candelestine@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

Just because they will be 100% unwilling to admit to you that they are actually physically experiencing the feeling of doubt, does not mean it isn't actually happening.

Don't expect them to be honest about what's going on inside them though. They value fighting, never giving up, persistence, dedication, loyalty, strength, power, confidence and security. None of these things makes it more likely for them to admit to you when something they disagree with might sound reasonable.

It's a defense mechanism. Can't just give it permission to function though.

You do have to back off before you actually infuriate them though, as the emotion of anger will strengthen the defense mechanisms dramatically. Better to walk away having peacefully left some food for thought. You can't convince them though, being so readily convinced would itself be unacceptable to them, just on principle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I find it fun backing them into corners and them becoming enraged. I then point out that they are not being very Christ like, and that usually ends my conversation with the charlatan.

[-] Chetzemoka@startrek.website 22 points 1 year ago

Jesus answered, “If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me.”

Matthew 19:21

https://www.biblegateway.com/verse/en/Matthew%2019%3A21

[-] HuddaBudda@kbin.social 124 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mathew 25: 36 - 40

I was a stranger, and ye took me in: 36naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me. 37Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? 38When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? 39Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee? 40And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.

Why does our country embody NONE of these ideals? Why do modern day Christians embody NONE of these ideals? How can we call ourselves a nation under god when we bomb innocent civilians, starve children for profit, imprison a population disproportionately then use them as slave labor, and shoot at immigrants for merely crossing an imaginary line.

What GOD would want us?

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 44 points 1 year ago

What GOD would want us?

The one that fell the walls of Jericho and asked Abraham to kill his son to show loyalty, and tested Job by murdering his family. That's their god.

[-] Goodbyeworld@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I agree in sentiment with this, but any serious reading of the Christian Bible shows the entire point of Christ is basically replacing the vengeful god with a loving and forgiving one. These people are just bad Christians.

[-] jtk@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 year ago

What kind of god gets their own autobiography so wrong on the first try that it needs a revision?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] makuus@pawb.social 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s the general shape of my reply when someone tries to tell me that it’s gay people or trans people or abortion or pornography that are ‘causing God to hate us’. You mean, it’s me and my husband and our trans friends, and not the hate and the murder and the greed and the privation of the downtrodden?

It’s never a productive conversation, let me tell you…

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stormtrooper@sopuli.xyz 110 points 1 year ago

Motherfucker better not mix fabrics.

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Also better not eat shellfish or pork. And he absolutely better not go back on his word. (The tale of Onan is sometimes misinterpreted as being about masturbation, but it's really about God killing a guy for going back on his word.)

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

He's wearing a good quality suit, he's mixing materials as that liner is almost certainly silk and the shirt linen or cotton.

[-] BillDaCatt@kbin.social 83 points 1 year ago

It is odd to me how many people claim to be guided by a 400+ year old European version of a 2000+ year old Middle-Eastern text.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago

A text that's been edited and changed for political reasons since it existed

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's such a classic answer because the bible doesn't say shit other than what we decide it says. Our interpretation of it follows cultural norms, not the other way around. One thing it damn sure doesn't say is abortion is wrong or that life begins at conception - it explicitly says the opposite and that hasn't somehow changed anyone's opinions.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago

There are some seriously juicy bits in the bible I'd read to him and ask him: Is this really your world view?

His response: "The Bible says a lot of things." (Then ignores what it means)

[-] superduperenigma@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

"The important thing to keep in mind is that there are cherry picked verses in the Bible that justify my bigoted views."

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

So has he sold all of his possessions and given the proceeds to the poor?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://geoffrobson.com/2017/09/28/squaring-off-against-jed-bartlet-an-alternate-ending-to-the-west-wing-and-homosexuality/

If only we could have this conversation happen then:

Chapter and verse! I wanted to ask you a couple of questions while I had you here. I’m interested in selling my youngest daughter into slavery, as sanctioned in Exodus 21:7. She’s a Georgetown sophomore, speaks fluent Italian, and always cleared the table when it was her turn. What would a good price for her be? While thinking about that, can I ask another? My Chief of Staff, Leo McGarry, insists on working on the Sabbath. Exodus 35:2 clearly says he should be put to death. Am I morally obligated to kill him myself, or is it okay to call the police? Here’s one that’s really important, ‘cause we’ve got a lot of sports fans in this town. Touching the skin of a dead pig makes one unclean: Leviticus 11:7. If they promise to wear gloves, can the Washington Redskins still play football? Can Notre Dame? Can West Point? Does the whole town really have to be together to stone my brother, John, for planting different crops side by side? Can I burn my mother in a small family gathering for wearing garments made from two different threads? Think about those questions, would you? One last thing, while you may be mistaking this for your monthly meeting of the Ignorant Tight-Ass Club, in this building, when the President stands, nobody sits.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PugJesus@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

brb selling my daughter

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 47 points 1 year ago

Elsewhere he wrote, “Experts project that homosexual marriage is the dark harbinger of chaos and sexual anarchy that could doom even the strongest republic.”

The gays are too powerful. Happily married homosexuals are too strong to contain.

[-] Son_of_dad@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Who are these experts on gayness? His weekend buddies?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Dude claims to be a Christian, but he’s the one who needs to read his Bible. Half the stuff he espouses doesn’t come from the New Testament.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

A lot of the stuff wingnuts espouse doesn't come from the new testament. They love the fire-and-brimstone, it shall be an abomination unto whatever horseshit from the old testament -- but only the bits and pieces of it that fit their preconceived notions and particular brand of hate.

They also love to blather about the "ten commandments." They can never tell you which set of ten, though. (Because they haven't read the damn book; The list in Exodus is different from the one in Deuteronomy.) None of them seem to be prepared to cite what Big J said about the commandments, either.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf 35 points 1 year ago

I wonder what his two daughters think about him being fully on board with this:

[-] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

"ExCUSE ME? You cannot rape these men, I believe they are angels, and they're my guests! The AUDACITY of your request! How DARE you! But please, rape my daughters on your way out. I insist." -Lot

[-] TechyDad@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

Don't worry. Those daughters got their revenge. After Sodom and Gemorah were destroyed, they got their father drunk, slept with him, and had his babies.

But the Bible is totally fine for kids to read, everyone!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] wildcardology@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

Well he should sell one his daughters in slavery.

Exodus 21:7-11

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 35 points 1 year ago

How does someone this deranged get elected to any position of power more influential than a homeowner's association?

[-] Grayox@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

Leaded Gasoline and disinformation.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Bet you anything this asshole ignores most, if not all, of the teachings of Jesus whenever it's convenient or profitable.

[-] DarkGamer@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

He's probably referring to the parts where women and slaves are property, you can beat your kids, and God orders his followers to commit genocides regularly.

[-] guyrocket@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

IF he reads his bible then he should know that there is almost unlimited room for interpreting most of its contents.

Does he not know how many different Christian denominations there are in the US? And that those exist because of theological differences?

I am concerned about the lack of depth he is demonstrating. Maybe I shouldn't be surprised.

ETA: It IS the house after all. My expectations should be lower, right?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] carbonprop@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NecessaryWeevil@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

So I take it that he has no opinions about his civil rights, or anyone else’s. Because the Bible does not talk about our rights, only our responsibilities. You will not find a single verse referencing freedom of religion, surely. But also nothing about freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, the right to privacy; or the right to a speedy trial by a jury of your peers, in which you have the right to face your accusers, and to see the evidence against you. And on and on, all the way down. Nothing at all.

These rights were so important to the colonists that they laid down their lives for them, against one the the most powerful empires in the history of the world. Why doesn’t Mike Johnson respect the founders of his own country? Or perhaps he doesn’t actually understand anything about it?

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Contradictory, ridiculously outdated, and easy to twist to your narrative?

Great worldview.

[-] masquenox@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Sooo... that means he is qualified to hold a position in ancient Judea - not modern-day USA.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SARGEx117@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I've read the Bible, multiple times. And only once when I still considered myself a Christian.

I call BULLSHIT.

[-] DumbAceDragon@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

Implying that everyone not only has a Bible on their shelf, but multiple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 year ago

Isn’t that the book that talks about horse semen and beastiality? Probably shouldn’t be in schools.

[-] CylonBunny@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The hypocrisy of the modern Republican Party I guess, but what would such an apparently devout Christian man see in Donald Trump of all people?!

[-] Ordoabchao@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

A worldview from 2000 years ago. What forward thinking politicians we have in this day and age!

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

You want atheists? That's how you get atheists

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
598 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19090 readers
3976 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS