Hmmm, monitoring employees and funneling info, huh?
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
237 points (99.2% liked)
politics
21970 readers
4282 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I question if this fulfills security requirements.
I don't. I'm sure it doesn't.
Gathering blackmail.
How the fuck does one of the biggest governments in the world with access to a top tier it department think the upgrade is starlink and not another fibre cable or more access points. Whatever the problem starlink for a city building is not the solution.
Do you really think the White House does not currently have a fiber connection?
The most likely scenario: this is all just a show.
They'll install a bunch of antennas and of course pay Dear Leader's favorite little drug addict indecent amounts of money, but in the background nothing will change and they'll use the existing, sane infrastructure.
Musk is in financial trouble so another government contract would help him a lot. Krasnov is feeds his loyal lackeys. Witness the outrageous White House Tesla car sales stunt.
I don't believe nothing will change. I do believe Musk will capture communications and use it to monitor people he believes are his biggest enemies, then use it to best-case blackmail them, worst-case have them arrested in trumped-up (no pun intended) charges.
Random unknown people are being kidnapped, tortured, and sold internationally as slaves by the government. These are the cases we know about because they are getting to the media. How many are not getting through the Right-supporting media? Do we really think actual opponents aren't just waiting targets?
Oh yes, please do "improve"... With the Starlink priority plans you'll have amazing speeds such as 40-220 Mbps down/8-25 Mbps up 😂😂
They're gonna shit their pants with excitement when they experience these speeds^^
Yikes I had no idea the speeds were so bad. Even my Australian internet is significantly faster
I mean it's a great product. For anyone living in a place where Fiber, 5G, or even a classic ADSL connection isn't available. If you use it in a well developed area that would offer you any of the above, you're a moron
Don’t forget the latency and QoS that’ll probably be done haphazardly limiting everyone to just a sliver of the total available bandwidth.
I don't thing latecy is a problem when you only use it to watch child porn
They'll be able to drive home and shit in the comfort of their own homes with those speeds. They'll have dumped their load before the page loads.
Because unlike fiber, which you can install and reasonably expect to work with minimal maintenance or other costs for years, Starlink has a guaranteed revenue stream by way of planned obsolescence. We will be constantly launching satellites to keep up replacement of the ones that are deorbitted, and that cost will naturally be passed on to the taxpayer.
Not that fiber installs aren't also a grift. After all, how many times has the American taxpayer paid for rural broadband?
Starlink is the purest definition of "space junk."
“Orbiting vintage space equipment “
Because Musk has mad conflicts of interest
A laundry list
Because now Mush gets to monitor all that is done and said digitally in the whole government
Grifters gonna grift
"Are you suggesting I don't understand Wi-Fi?", US Press secretary... Probably
Yes, yes I am. Can you tell me which security standard you are using? WEP or WPA? (If they answer WPA) And which type?
Ominous voice: "She doesn't."
They have zero idea. It's bidirectional satellite, and not low-latency, so...ELON SAID SO
Eh, it's decently low latency. Around 40ms or so. That doesn't make it useful for them though. There's absolutely no -legitimate- reason for it in the white house. As for illegitimate reasons, why could Musk possibly want a connection inside the white house that has no oversight other than his own...?
60+Ms at a minimum is not low latency. What are you on about? I have 10ms from coast to coast on residential fiber.
Government installs which were previously on fiber are being switched to this bullshit. Fiber international interconnect to Australia right now is 13ms from DC to Sydney. Big fucking difference.
15,700+km from DC to Sydney, which is 52+ms at light speed....
It might depend on location and congestion, but usually it is under 25ms on average.
That's just the new direct line to our great comrade Putties poot.
Because trump wants to reward leon for his servitude and contributions with a huge ass government contract.
Starlink is free the first month, but after that it's 19,999,999.00 a month. Data theft is a free bonus.
Like his semen he spreads his companies everywhere.
It’s in series for rubes.
It's a good backup internet service to avoid BIFF. But it reads like they are piping in internet from a datacenter, so just using starlink as an ISP.
Why? $$$. I bet the whitehouse spends a lot on internet.
Also, it's probably really easy to perform traffic inspection using starlink vs an established, regulated ISP.