this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
298 points (98.1% liked)

Canada

9223 readers
2195 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

https://www.thehandbasket.co/p/trump-fentanyl-weapon-of-mass-destruction-executive-order-draft-scoop

Well this is absolutely frightening in so much that Trump is going to force his way into Canada via military operations by claiming fentanyl as a weapon of mass destruction.

Anyone remember the Bush Administration and WMDs they said were there but never were?

Elbows up Canuck’s. The time to prepare is most likely closer than we think.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 102 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For a guy who said he wasn't gonna go to war, he sure as fuck sounds like a guy getting ready to go to war.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

I just hope the economy finally crashes before he gets the chance.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Since the major sources of fentanyl brought into the USA are from Mexico and South America, and originate in China I get the feeling he will either invade the south or just use this as an excuse to grab more power without actually mobilizing. He sure as fuck doesn't have the balls to deal with daddy China, he praises the shit of out Xi.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 83 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If you want peace, prepare for war.

I'm not being facetious and I'm not joking, and I don't think he is either.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (9 children)

Should have acquired nukes. This is the message.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 82 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Here comes the "special military operation", but it's not a declaration of war so he doesn't need congressional approval.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 week ago

Actually thanks to the 2001 AUMF he doesn't need Congress as long as it's part of the (still ongoing, never officially ended) "war on terror". Which, presumably, would include stopping WMDs.

[–] pticrix@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Soooo can we declare Purdue Pharmaceutical and the Sackler family terrorists organization under that rhetoric? Asking for a friendly nation.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nope only applies to illicit fentanyl. Same reason coca cola is the nation's only legal supplier of cocaine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is so he can get wartime and "emergency powers" to stop the midterm elections

[–] oxysis@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Can't wait to be jailed for being an enemy of the state for fucking anything

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If that time comes, remove as many as you can and don't be a prisoner

[–] oxysis@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don’t want to be a prisoner but let’s be honest they already know what I have typed. It’s already been green lit to spy on queer folx for being queer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 35 points 1 week ago

I agree that this is just so he has reason to continue his attacks, I am guessing it will be aimed at Mexico but Canada needs to be ready.

[–] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago

In the read out from the PCC meeting on Friday, it says the participating agencies “recognize the need for the United States to take strong action to counter this devastating situation, but these bureaus share significant policy concerns with the Executive Order as drafted.”

Those concerns include the fact that the EO “cites a statute that does not entail an authority to ‘designate’ substances as WMD,” concerns about “negative effects on entities that legitimately handle, ship, and deliver opioids for pharmaceutical purposes,” and acknowledges that “fentanyl can be treated as a chemical weapon when it is developed or used as a weapon…which risks muddying clearly defined roles and responsibilities between the counternarcotics, counterproliferation, and arms control communities.”

Trump has blown by just blurring the lines since he was sworn in. He's wiping them out completely.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

He's so far outside the box predictions don't work anymore. But food for thought; Americans associate drugs with Mexico far more than any other country. So this would be one hell of a head whip for the general public. Americans also still consider Canada one of our closest friends on the global stage. Many families in the North span the border. For that fact alone there's a very good chance that if he attacks Canada we'd shut this country down with protests and strikes.

On a rational predictable level he's already declared cartels to be terrorists and Venezuela to be a terrorist state. This is very likely another tool to pressure the Mexican government.

That said, I wouldn't trust us right now. We're like that friend who took too much cocaine and is hiding in the closet with a gun. Unpredictable and dangerous.

[–] MyMotherIsAHamster@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Speaking for myself, someone with family and friends in the US, I don't trust you one bit right now - your current government is an enemy to Canada, period.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I’m not really sure Americans would shut down their country at this point. For one thing, they seem incapable of protesting. More importantly though, Republicans seem fully sold on an invasion and even some Democrats seem rather excited to use us to “move their politics left” (as if we’d get the right to vote)

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Your optimism as to how the American people would react is cute, but likely not realistic. There's a huge chunk of Americans who voted for this, there's another huge chunk that didn't care to even bother voting. The thought that someone who couldn't be arsed to spend an hour popping in to vote, would get organized and take up arms -- especially on behalf of other people / principles / morals -- is a bit of a stretch.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Here's the thing. The way the American highway system works is it goes from city to city. And millions of people in the northern cities voted against him. We don't need to shut down the roads in the rural red areas. His Canadian state idea also wasn't a part of his campaign and many Americans still think it's nothing more than him being his normal blathering self. So we aren't seeing true opposition get captured in polling yet.

I agree that he's dangerous. And I don't know what we could do to stop him but I am absolutely sure the military would suffer high rates of desertion compared to orders to invade Panama, Mexico, or Venezuela. I am also sure that Congress would not use the war powers act to stop him in any invasion, nor would he listen to them if they did. So whatever has to happen is up to the people, and there are at least 80 million pissed off Americans right now. You're right that I can't guarantee anything on their behalf. I can only offer an inside perspective and my apologies.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wasn't there a bust of like 1000 lbs of fentanyl crossing the border from the US into Canada recently?

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

I believe there was, but Donny dumbass doesn’t care about that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lobut@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Serious question, should I get a gun?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (10 children)

The statistics are overwhelmingly clear; the most likely person to be killed by a gun is its owner.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The only resistance that could stand a chance against the US army would be organized by the Canadian government, in which case they’d provide you with the weapon.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] derpgon@programming.dev 5 points 1 week ago

No, fentanyl might be more effective at mass destruction. /s (obviously)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Fentanyl is the preferred opiate in hospitals. Cheaper per dose. US used to be able to "influence" Afghanistan to help its drug trade profits. Fentanyl is cheap because it doesn't need controlled plants in addition to potency.

https://www.npr.org/2020/10/05/918279481/some-health-workers-suffering-from-addiction-steal-drugs-meant-for-patients

Hard to get an exact number for hospital theft amount of fentanyl, but

3,600 cases of alleged drug theft at healthcare facilities over the last five years, including 280 cases so far in 2020.

111,000 instances here where the folks that were reviewing [drug inventories] could not figure out why the math didn't add up,"

What is almost certain is that US healthcare system is a larger source of illegal fentanyl than Canada. If the absurdity that it is a WMD is taken, there should be military security around hospitals before it's placed at the borders.

The death potential of the vial of Anthrax Colin Powell quoted to UN was based on using an eye dropper to kill individuals one by one. WMDs actually require mass deaths from one event as a definition.

Canada needs to immediately stop military cooperation with US. Kick them out of NORAD unless they pay high rent. Stop threatening US enemies, and accepting them as our own.

[–] CanadianCorhen@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

yep, when my wife was giving birth, they gave her Fentanyl.

Guess all hopsitals are terrorists.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Someone call Hans Blix, we gotta find them WMDs in Canada. Funny if they dont find any.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

Oh for fuck sakes.

[–] brax@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

About time the USA started treating domestic terrorism appropriately...

...oh

[–] pelgraine@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s interesting that this 2019 article shows this idea isn’t a new one - https://edition.cnn.com/2019/04/21/politics/dhs-fentanyl-wmd/index.html

The fact that they were considering back then has me wondering if this apparently leaked draft EO might have actual substance to it, which is disturbing to say the least.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Mexican cartels and elements of the heroin trade have been known to use fentanyl as an additive to increase the potency of other illegal drugs.

He's already invoked the alien enemies act against Venezuelan cartels, effectively declaring war on Venezuela. He's setting up a shooting war in Central America.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No, he did not effectively declare war on Venezuela, which is exactly why his use of the act was immediately blocked by courts. He's trying to use a law designed for times of war without actually being in a war with the people he wants to target.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That war is how he is going to solve the economic crisis resulting from hia isolationist tariffs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CowsLookLikeMaps@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago

Alright, folks. Time to get on !MapleResistance@lemmy.ca, !Canada@50501.chat, and !resist@fedia.io. !preppers@lemmy.ca could use some love too

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 week ago

It's this that "newspeak" I've been hearing about?

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago
[–] chuck@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Hmm fenyntal as a weapon wasn't on my list of war crimes to add to the Geneva checklist but we can throw it to the boys to figure out how to make it work and be novel enough to add a section or two to the next version

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago

First as tragedy, then as farce

[–] MyMotherIsAHamster@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those photos of WMDs? They were balls.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

Hands down one of the best shows ever!!

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Trump right now.

Can we just FFW to the end? Pretty please?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FreudianCafe@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

If this goes forward, we have to pay close atention. This certainly is looking for two goals, short and long term. Short is Canada and Mexico. Long term is China

load more comments
view more: next ›