this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
892 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22200 readers
3606 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Sounds like maybe Trump did know something about Project 2025 after all...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 19 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

yup. we told you so. and i hate saying this.

the worst part is that we, in the third world, are going to suffer worse than you.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Lemmy.ml

You fuckers were rooting for it bozo you think everyone else has amensia?

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml -1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

kindly fuck off with that bullshit.

[–] Doom@ttrpg.network -2 points 12 hours ago

Lmfao go piss yourself to death my guy lemmy.ml is bullshit and so are you now kindly shit off and go blow your mother

[–] lipilee@feddit.nl 0 points 18 hours ago

so the USA is at Project 850.5 currently, if I'm not mistaken.

[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 77 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's amazing how well he's hitting a target he never heard of before.

[–] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Correct. He is the distraction. DOGE and the cabinet billionaires are doing the heavy lifting of p2025

[–] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 3 points 15 hours ago

The President in particular is very much a figurehead — he wields no real power whatsoever. He is apparently chosen by the government, but the qualities he is required to display are not those of leadership but those of finely judged outrage. For this reason the President is always a controversial choice, always an infuriating but fascinating character. His job is not to wield power but to draw attention away from it. -HHGTTG

Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - Douglas Adams

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The last time the Democrats had a coherent plan for when they got into office was 1930

[–] IDKWhatUsernametoPutHereLolol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was preceeded by a market crash.

The market is crashing right now.

Hopefully we'll get another Progressive Era.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago

Eh. We've just bought ourselves a decade or two of industrialized warfare and martial law by the looks of things. That will have to be survived first.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Wait. Isn’t this the thing Führer Trump said he didn’t know anything about?

[–] saimen@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

He was saying that sarcastically

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

After having given a speech to it's creators about it, calling it a "plan for our movement", yes. There is video available.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kittenzrulz123@lemmy.blahaj.zone 139 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (19 children)

Democrats when they win an election: Wahhhh we dont have a congressional majority :c

Republicans when they win an election: FUCK LEGAL PRECEDENT I AM MORE POWERFUL THEN THE COURTS AND GOD, I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO GETS IN MY WAY

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 4 points 22 hours ago

Equivalent, right?

So fucking equivalent.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Destroying is always easier than building.

[–] lorty@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 day ago

Oh, they are building something

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 36 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Democrats when elected: okay but we only had all three branches of government for two years and Joe Lieberman was kinda mean :(

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago

"Why do you dislike us? Our last major victory was a watered down bill by conservative think tanks 15 years ago! We can do more! ...We just never wanna."

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Democrats when they win an election: Wahhhh we dont have a congressional majority :c

Republicans when they win an election: FUCK LEGAL PRECEDENT I AM MORE POWERFUL THEN THE COURTS AND GOD, I WILL MURDER ANYONE WHO GETS IN MY WAY

May I steal this for the body of an image to post on !leftymemes@lemmy.dbzer0.com?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 164 points 2 days ago (15 children)

the part that pisses me off the most about this is that the democrats all read the thrice-damned playbook.

Like. WHY THE FUCK DO THEY NOT HAVE A PLAN?!

oh. that and the fucking nazis are winning.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 72 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That’s genuinely the most sanity-destroying part of this for me.

They made a playbook years ago. They said they made it. The posted it openly on the internet years ago. They said they’d follow the playbook. They’re now following the playbook. They’re continuing to follow the playbook. They are completing entire sections of the playbook, according to what was written in the playbook. They will continue to follow the playbook.

This is not a surprise. You are not allowed to be surprised by this. Fucking stop it.

And yet: all the Democratic leadership and rank-and-file - save for a very small handful of progressives - are all in a constant state of shock and surprise. What the absolute fuck. How. HOW.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

and more infuriating- they ran on "WE NEED TO FIGHT THIS".

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Right? And then they fucking softballed it. Like, what the fuck. What the actual fuck.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“We can’t remove the filibuster… what if we need it?!”…

(Some time later, when it’s needed…)

“Best we can do is…. NOTHING

  • Cluck-Cluck Chuck
[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I’m also quite certain the fascists will ditch the filibuster the second orangeboi asks them to

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yup.

At this point, the republicans can’t fold fast enough, and democrats are just stepping aside because “reasons”.

There’s only a handful of people actually standing up.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The Republican aren’t folding. They’re putting their armbands on.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 34 points 2 days ago (4 children)

And some will still say he had nothing to do with it

He's an enabler, not necessarily a doer.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›