this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025

440 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

67151 readers

4377 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

440

Musk’s X suspends opposition accounts in Turkey amid civil unrest (www.politico.eu)

submitted 21 hours ago by boramalper@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

30 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 32 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MITM0@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

Hey Turkish people; Mastodon, Pleroma & Akkoma are a thing Use it & join the Fediverse

[–] stickly@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Someone needs to make an inverse-xwitter platform. You're only allowed to tweet if you prove you've been banned on X.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 17 hours ago

Fash support fash.

[–] Nednarb44@lemmy.world 142 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

As long as he keeps saying he's a free speech absolutist, we have to believe him.... Right?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

I mean, he's free to say it, but we're free to call him a liar until he uses his immense resources to shut us up like he always does.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 76 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

He seems to be very much in favor of his own speech being completely free of any relation to reality.

[–] gjoel@programming.dev 17 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Elon should be allowed to say whatever he wants without anyone contradicting or fact checking him. His power to be free to say whatever he wants should be absolute!

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 20 hours ago

Everybody knows that you only attain free speech when you control a platform with hundreds of millions of users and can ban anyone you disagree with at any time, for any reason.

[–] Nednarb44@lemmy.world 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Right, and speech free from criticism obviously

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 10 points 18 hours ago

There's nothing more American than bragging about freedom while your freedom is stripped away from you right in front of your eyes.

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 13 points 20 hours ago

Free speech abolitionist.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

i mean he did it the last time their were elections in turkey too..

[–] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 27 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Ah, so Turkey is who gave Twitter $1bn recently.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago

They’re also giving us eggs. Hmm

[–] NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago

turkey moment

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 63 points 20 hours ago

People need to get off this stupid platform. It was bad before without Elon, now it's just the worse.

[–] Naich 37 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Musk will always side with the fascist or the dictator.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 15 points 18 hours ago

He will always side with profit. If he doesn't do this Turkey will ban X from the country. Of course these kinds of threats only come from fascists so the correlation is indeed high.

[–] Zacpod@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

People still use Shitter?

[+] wosat@lemmy.world -7 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I get that it's trendy to bash Elon, but he has always said that X would attempt to follow local laws:

By “free speech”, I simply mean that which matches the law. I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law. If people want less free speech, they will ask government to pass laws to that effect. Therefore, going beyond the law is contrary to the will of the people.

He has pushed back on countries who attempt to push their censorship dictates on the world -- hence, why many of the account suspensions are only in effect within Turkey:

Some accounts appear to be suspended only in Turkey and not in the rest of the world.

Larger question: Why is Elon/X getting more flak than the authoritarian douchebag -- Erdoğan -- and his cronies in the judiciary who are censoring and jailing political opponents?

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't like the either/or, but I think Elon is an easier target in the Anglosphere. But the US government, of which Elon is a part, has been enabling authoritarian douchebags, and even if this act is consistent with the company's pragmatic compliance choices, it also aligns with the US administration's general tendency. And Elon has in other cases shown that his commitment to free speech is pretty weak if it's speech that he doesn't like.

[+] huppakee@lemm.ee -19 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

No matter how much I dislike Musk, I don't think he's giving that much choice. Erdogan is a dictator who has the power to block X altogether. A real free speech advocate would not succcumb to the pressure of a repressive government, but the article does imply Musk is not the initiator of these bans: "Musk himself said that "the choice is have Twitter throttled in its entirety or limit access to some tweets." He said X would publicly post the Turkish government's requests."

Not saying we shouldn't put Tesla's on fire tho.

[–] everton137@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

But when it came to following the orders of the Brazilian Supreme Court to provide information about far-right criminals, he defied the country and had X banned for a few weeks on the whole country.

There is a clear bias when it comes to who X bans, which always favors governments with authoritarian tendencies.

[–] dojan@lemmy.world 33 points 19 hours ago

Yeah so the solution there is to not just bow down to a dictator. If they want to block Twitter altogether, let them. Let's not pretend that Musk isn't willingly going along with that.

[–] FauxPseudo@lemmy.world 19 points 19 hours ago

He only cares about laws when he wants to. He literally controls the internet over their head with Starlink. He could have uncensored Twitter on there and FYIWDWYTM. He isn't powerless. He is, once again, selectively deciding who gets free speech.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 7 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Erdogan is a dictator who has the power to block X altogether.

Does it really make a difference whether it's Erdogan or Musk who silences these people?

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 5 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

For the people on the streets it doesn't change anything, but it's weird how little blame Erdogan is getting here.

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because he is getting blamed all the time, no one is defending that piece of shit. He has been a thorn in everybodys side for very long.

Musk, on the other hand, is still seen as a genious hero by some people.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 3 points 16 hours ago

Just because most everyone agrees doesn’t mean you should stop. The vast majority of Lemme seems to agree that Musk is a piece of shit, but I’m going to keep point it out anyway.

[–] Hominine@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

You're not wrong.