286
submitted 1 year ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 92 points 1 year ago

Like, I get wanting to defend the rights of women under oppressive religions and governments, but how exactly does controlling what women are allowed to wear accomplish that?

[-] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 65 points 1 year ago

It’s because this has nothing to do with that. It’s virtue signaling that they don’t like Muslims, nothing less and nothing more.

[-] ikiru@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Being Islamophobic is a Virtue now?

[-] ISOmorph@feddit.de 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes. Yes it is. Welcome to 2023.

[-] ikiru@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

2023 sucks.

[-] OhNoMoreLemmy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

It's a lot like the 70s but we have WiFi.

[-] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 year ago

It is for conservatives.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BlackNo1@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago

im not the biggest fan of the muslim faith but this is stupid

[-] anlumo@feddit.de 60 points 1 year ago

Austria also has a law like that, and it has been a complete shitshow. There have been fines for someone wearing a scarf while riding a bike and for someone at work dressed up in a body suit in front of the shop for advertisement reasons (like a mascot).

When the law went into effect, the newspapers reported that there were about ten muslim women currently wearing coverings in the whole country.

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

After years of covid where everyone would supposedly die in terror attacks if the face coverings happened I'm surprised this fear mongering still manages to pass.

Full face covering burqas are not really an Islamic thing. The headscarves are. The burqas are a cultural thing for some. And usually almost nobody actually wears them. But you can get brownie points with the racists for passing these laws and show that your country is well on the way to moral decline.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 48 points 1 year ago

Gotta make sure you don't compromise that facial recognition

[-] TWeaK@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Apparently measuring a person's natural walking gait is far more effective at identifying people. Who knew Monty Python had it right, so long ago.

[-] AngrilyEatingMuffins@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

Stub your toe for the Revolution

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 342345@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago

YES!

It's important how much clothing you wear. Not too much and not too little. It MUST BE the RIGHT amount.

Humans.

[-] spez_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Personally we need to ban underwear and socks

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] nikscha@feddit.de 26 points 1 year ago

I hate this. What if I wanna cover my face to evade facial detection? That's illegal now?

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago

Nope, wear a surgical mask.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Lols@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

no dont worry, its only the brown people face coverings that are bad

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] bitwolf@lemmy.one 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What if I'm cold or want to go skiing? I could wrap a scarf over my face which I have done. Is that not illegal because it's not the same garment?

What about COVID? Wouldn't masks conflict with that also? Of all countries I'd never imagine one with a colder climate to make such a law.

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

There are exceptions for sport and health&safety. You can do all of these things.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 15 points 1 year ago

I can understand the reasoning for government officials and kids at school, but what are they smoking to straight up ban it in their country?

[-] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The same thing islamist countries are smoking when they kill women not covering their head, probably.

[-] Lols@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

i am glad that we are fighting these terrible regimes that enforce what women can and cannot wear by letting the regime enforce what women can and cannot wear

high five gang

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HubertManne@kbin.social 14 points 1 year ago

These do seem inconsistant. What about 95 masks? that covers the face and nose.

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

But not the eyes. Besides it's easy to include an exception for legitimate medical purposes - even considering the law was written by a bunch of quasi-fascists I would be surprised if that's not covered in the law, especially since the article mentions there are exceptions.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] electrogamerman@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I wonder if all the Muslims here saying "women should be dressing whatever they want", also protest the same in muslims countries where women are killed for not covering their hair.

[-] Flyswat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago

Are you living under a rock? Haven't you seen the men protesting in Iran??

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

I can't even take half of you seriously. Every religion is a cult, but this one is an extremely misogynistic cult and you don't get anything for being their unpaid defenders online beyond the knowledge that you protected extreme womanizers.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] sergih@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

A country telling women what to wear will be on the same page in my book as the country telling women what not to wear.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

I'd rather see swiss banks having to spill the beans about their many criminal enterprises and criminal customers. Tax evasion is a crime, for those unaware

[-] bigFab@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

What's the official reason for that law?

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 51 points 1 year ago

The official reason is "in our culture we show each other our faces"

The real reason is "I'm racist and I hate muslims"

Source: am swiss. (I voted against this law.)

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Turun@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Winter is gonna be fun, lol. Austria already implemented and rolled back a similar ban.

The article says there are exceptions, but doesn't provide any useful information unfortunately.

[-] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

Don't worry. Its only for brown people.

[-] Tvkan@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

Winter is gonna be fun, lol.

They'll have a list of exceptions that basically means anyone but muslims.

Austria already implemented and rolled back a similar ban.

It's still in force.

[-] Nighed@sffa.community 7 points 1 year ago

Just in time for Halloween!

(Probably not a big thing in CHE)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2023
286 points (98.0% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, 🇩🇪 ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS