this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
616 points (98.0% liked)

Funny

8936 readers
1127 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 38 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)
[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago

Glad to see you and others beat me to it :)

[–] reka@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

hope he's doing ok, he truly is unlike any other internet personality

He was my first thought too 😆

[–] polle@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 29 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Hypothesis A:

  • his name is J. Random Error

Hypothesis B:

  • he's real, has a brain anomaly, and is taking androgen antagonists (e.g. 5-alpha-reductase inhibitors) for breakfast, lunch and dinner. It's not testosterone which has most biological effect, but dihydrotestosterone. T is just the guidance signal from the brain. DHT does the heavy lifting in tissue. If you don't want to operate on the brain, you can block the result and leave the guidance signal going wrong.
[–] eepydeeby@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 5 days ago

Dihydrotestosterone Georg

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 24 points 5 days ago

Smart Hulk.

There's probably severe health complications with that level of testosterone though.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

roid raging chess club president

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So is Sir Patrick Stewart. So what.

[–] Thcdenton@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] DoubleSpace@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago (2 children)

You say that like its a bad thing? I dont have to wait for my hair to dry...

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

not saying it's a bad thing, but probably counter to the image people seem to have in mind in the comments.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Probably bald and sad

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (4 children)

So I'm not a data scientist but doesn't this basically say that your testosterone and IQ are pretty independent of each other?

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

No, the big cloud of data points says they are pretty dependent and the little outlier says outliers can exist.

[–] TonyTonyChopper@mander.xyz 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I am a scientist and it pisses me off that the independent variable is on the y axis

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 5 points 5 days ago

The depiction does not tell you anything since you cannot see structure in the black blob. It shows that outliers do exist which is expected since biology is messy.

There is the slightest anti correlation for measured testosterone levels and IQ, but on the individual level this is meaningless. There are people with testosterone resistance to various levels which would require diligent treatment to destill a more useful graph, but that's infeasible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PresidentCamacho@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Chart is lifetime natural. Isratel piss can't be tested because it eats through any cup you put it in.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Yessir, that's the saucer what took muh cousin Darryl.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Could be someone with mild testosterone insensitivity, people like that often have elevated testosterone levels without the effects of elevated testosterone levels.

[–] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

I know that guy, he's sound.

[–] Garyu@lemm.ee 4 points 5 days ago
[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 days ago
[–] bss03@infosec.pub 3 points 5 days ago

Presidential. /s

[–] Xtallll@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 days ago

Captain Steven Rodgers.

load more comments
view more: next ›