You can replace the word "Bitcoin" with almost anything else and it'll make more sense.
this post was submitted on 03 May 2025
374 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1822 readers
361 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
My Uncle is like this, he's currentley living in the same building as me, I sometimes wonder what shit he's posting thats getting traced back to our IP that I will eventually get blamed for.
If we lived in the US, I'd be legitimately worried.
"Let them eat bitcoin"?
I'll trade those cheap chocolate coins for your bitcoins, at a 1:1 ratio. Seems about the same value
Bitcoin is to men what MLMs are to women.
Given that he put no effort in finding some arguments, this is a case of "negative publicity is publicity too"?
I would guess, yeah. But 80% of X looks like this, so I don't know what's engagement farming and what's normal posting in a community of radical idiots anymore.
Damn, that's worse than i thought.
At this point, shouldn't it be considered a acquired mental disorder?
They're barely just now accepting that CTE's from smashing their heads together for fun might be a bad idea, it's going to take centuries for them to realize their social media echo chambers are probably worse overall than actual head trauma, if only because brain rot is a very communicable disease and their population has no herd immunity.
Bitcoin was a typo, he meant beef tallow
The beef tallow thing is painfully stupid...
I have started to wonder if the fact that adding it back makes it so vegetarians and vegans can no longer eat french fries (that are made with it) had anything to do with that decision... Or was that just an "unexpected bonus" in their minds?
I'm guessing that you're too young to remember. Lucky 10000! In the 1990s, McDonald's was under attack for a variety of anti-environmentalist practices, and by 2001 there was a class-action lawsuit against them for using beef tallow in fries from a coalition of vegetarians, vegans, and primarily Hindus who were deeply offended that they had been tricked into consuming what they consider to be a sacred animal. In a nutshell, it's a very racist and revanchist move, not just an anti-environmentalist move.
Unlike normal, I can't link to good peer-reviewed articles on the topic. McDonald's is one of the few groups who can successfully control their Internet presence, and they've washed away these controversies as best they can. I almost feel like linking to this summary of the case on Wikipedia is unhelpful, since it's got so many apologetic caveats. They do this all over Wikipedia; McLibel or Liebeck are also heavily edited in favor of McDonald's. You'll have to explicitly add "hindu" or "indian" to search queries; for example, instead of "mcdonalds beef tallow", try "mcdonalds beef tallow hindu indians".
I still don't understand what that was about, like do fries made in tallow taste better? Or at least noticeably different?
Idk if I have the formulation right on this but I imagine it’s a combination of various things:
- Conservative nostalgia, concretely for fries themselves and abstractly for a fake, idealised version of the past.
- Crackpot health woo: beef tallow is “carnivore” and “caveman” diet-coded. It’s not a processed/GMO seed oil.
- Conspiracy by US Big Dairy to beef up their numbers.
I can’t speak for the taste. However, the fat used to fry fries does make a difference, as fat is a conveyance of flavour. Many fry recipes call for peanut oil, for example, while many people prefer using a neutral oil like canola to deep fry. I don’t think I know instinctively what the taste of beef tallow is like, but I imagine it’s just… beefy?
Notably different oils have different smoke points, meaning you can fry at higher temperatures for different textures. That’s why duck fat potatoes are a thing, for example.
Malcolm Gladwell famously has a podcast episode on the crusade against beef tallow, where he also replicates mcdonalds fries with beef tallow. But Gladwell is a chud, so fuck all that.
Conservative nostalgia, concretely for fries themselves and abstractly for a fake, idealised version of the past.
This is so weird to me like you can literally just go out and have fries today and they're great? They're so much better now because there's so many different places that literally just sell fries with various sauces so they have to be in an arms-race for the most delicious kind of sauce and the best fries. Plus everyone now offers sweet potato fries if you're bored of the normal ones. There's never been a better time for fries. When I was a kid fries fucking sucked man, and they had only ketchup.
100%. Nostalgia is a toxic impulse.
People remember fries used to taste better, and they'll attribute it to anything except the maturation of their pallate.
It prob is a "some culture warrior/bodybuilder misread a piece of research and it turned into a culture war conspiracy" thing. Like soy. (My silly nickname predates the culture war stuff by several decades, it comes from Shadowrun).
E: yes looked it up, comes via RFK of course and is anti seed oils thing. https://www.diningandcooking.com/1742624/america-stopped-cooking-with-tallow-for-a-reason/ and the anti seeds oil thing is an idea that has been spreading through the (far) right blogosphere for a decade or more (that is when I heard of it, so prob existed before that).
Our friends of the pod at lw also joined in https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/DHkkL2GxhxoceLzua/thoughts-on-seed-oil (but it concludes the seed oil theory is full of shit, points for LW there, well done (dont read the comments, there is roundup in the seed oils)).
Well, LW is only being no more wrong than Andrew Tate there, so they don't deserve too many points.
Yes the score is still negative even of they had one win. Note how the glyposate asspull still got 50 upvotes. (And how one person went 'wow i have the same' in reaction to that to then just go 'it was gluten'. Enormous levels of contrarian so open minded their brains now have worms stuff. And amazing that all of this started just because Yud thought others were not unbiassed enough to properly understand his argument about training agi safely. Talk about 'I realized my initial goals were impossible so I made secondary goals which were also impossible so I'm going to become a weird (far) right winger scope drift. See also Musk. Whos plans for Mars were replaced with AI robots, and now is starting a company townwith all the women he has kids with (see also 'the implication'). (Yeah I made up that his women compound and company town are in the same place, but you get my point I hope).
Interesting how they fail in similar ways, Musk ignores the community notes and spouts his bs, vs Yud and ignoring the post (i assume 2023 yud vs 2024 lw) and already going anti meta study (??) in the tweet. Womens compound vs math pets. Weird science fiction bs vs weird science fiction ba. Has group of haters he claims are actually a small (undead) Jewish cabal who are behind all his hate vs Has group of haters who all are (goth) David Gerard.
One of the biggest realizations I had in High School is there are two kinds of people who hate bullies: those who don't think bullies should exist, and those who want the bully's power for themselves.
So it it with crypto. These jerkoffs don't want to crush the corrupt monetary system, they want to supplant it with their own scam.
It's a movement driven in no small part by rage. By people who looked at [the financial crash of] 2008 - who looked at the system as it exists - but concluded that the problems with capitalism were that it didn't provide enough opportunities to be the boot.
All credit to Dan Olson's masterpeice video Line Goes Up - The Problem With NFTs. Now, if you'll excuse me, I've got to go watch the whole thing again.
Danny O. is a treasure
Yep, anyone who wants to change the rules stands to benefit from that change. It wouldn’t make sense otherwise.
load more comments
(1 replies)
If this guy is a CFA, I’d rather light my money on fire than let him manage it. I feel like the outcome would be the same anyway.
I bet you're thinking of CPAs (not to be confused with CPAs or CPAs), who are the sort of folks that might manage money for the working class. CFAs are something different:
The top employers of CFA charter-holders globally include UBS, JPMorgan Chase, Royal Bank of Canada, Bank of America, and Morgan Stanley.
You shouldn't let any CFA directly manage your assets. Go to your local credit union and get free advice from their CPAs; they often have a standard path to wealth-building for their members, even those without much in the savings account.
He may not be directly managing his clients' money, but he is probably advising them on how to invest. Badly.
A burning pile of money at least has some warmth, though.
"Bitcoin" could just as easily be swapped with "prayer" in this sentence, with the same implications
Do you have time to talk about your bitcoins extended warranty, it now uses AI!
mhm and how would Bitcoin fix those problems though? Can those Techbros actually answer that?
Value of number goes up, this fixes inflation somehow
load more comments
(7 replies)
view more: next ›