10
The Marvels, goofy and bold, shows there’s still some magic left in the MCU (www.vox.com)
submitted 1 year ago by TokenBoomer@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
37 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Vox.com

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I though the movie was fun.

My biggest issue with the MCU as a whole is scale creep. The stakes don't always have to be larger than last time. When the scope becomes so vast that our place in it becomes lost, the catastrophe you're trying to avert stops being a tragedy and starts being a statistic, and then an abstraction. Big enough stakes are no stakes.

And ffs, can we do something other than sky beams opening portals? These stories ride on the personalities of the characters and how they react to different situations. Not the same situation in a different shade of purple this time.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

That was one of the things that made Guardians of the Galaxy 3 interesting.

The stakes were so low! Would it have changed anything on a galactic scale if Rocket had been claimed by the High Evolutionary? No, not really. It would have sucked for everyone personally involved, but Knowhere would have kept rolling on...

[-] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Same with Captain America: Civil War. Dude just wanted to break up the Avengers, not destroy the world/solar system/galaxy/universe.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago

is this really news?

[-] bigbluealien@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Well damn, had to read your comment to notice what community this was in, certainly doesn't belong here

[-] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

And I had to read your comment to realize the one you replied to wasn’t just being sarcastic about an expected result

[-] DelvianSeek@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Saw it last night, mostly agree with this take on it, though in a bit less glowing terms. I didn't think the emotional payoff alluded to in this review really worked, because I didn't think they'd laid enough groundwork for it. Too much of this movie was more storyboard than story, with not enough time spent on actually delving into these characters' feelings and relationships. That said, it was definitely a fun popcorn flick, with some great action, a good sense of humor, fun characters, and, as the article points out, minimal required external knowledge. And everything said about the publicity was spot on.

[-] pwnicholson@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Exactly. Early Marvel was deeply about character and their depth and character flaws that made them interesting. Thor, Steve Rogers, Natasha Romanov, and especially Tony Stark were interesting and complex personalities. (Bruce Banner and Clint Barton...eh).

The stories in recent Marvel products are fine. Mildly interesting serials. Ok popcorn fare.

But the character development has been getting more and more lacking. Even Thor has been reduced to 'dumb blonde'/'dumb entitled rich kid' gags.

I think that's part of what makes Loki one of the only really interesting outings for Marvel recently. He stayed reasonably conflicted and complex.

[-] AlligatorBlizzard@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

The comics struggled with making Clint Barton interesting on his own for quite a while - the Matt Fraction Hawkeye series actually succeeded in making him interesting though, and I was rather disappointed when the MCU went a different route.

[-] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I just want to see Jeremy Renner do more Mission Impossible. I liked that one.

[-] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I think Thor is actually more interesting of a character in his later movies, but other than that I pretty much agree with you

[-] June@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Yea, my biggest gripe is how little they let the movie breathe. It was constant cuts immediately away from an important moment. I know what they were going for in each moment, but the immediate scene change ended up making it really flat and the climax was really anti-climactic. I was sure there was another 30 minutes left when the movie was about to end.

That said I still really enjoyed it. It was fun, goofy, some really good sequences, and it did a good job setting up the next phase.

[-] tdawg@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Honestly I'm just tired of the hero fad

[-] DemBoSain@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago

I'm tired of "you need to watch this TV show to know what's going on in the next movie because everything is interconnected and everything is critically-essential to the world building." Marvel...Star Wars...is it just Disney? Maybe I'm tired of Disney.

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

But how else can they continue to extract subscription fees, movie ticket prices, and merch purchases from you, the customer, at every turn?

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Fun movie. While I liked Kahns' interaction with her parents, I would have liked to have seen more interaction between Monica, Carol, and Kamala. Also that credits trailer!! I can't wait!

[-] BruceTwarzen@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Yay more Disney poop

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's funny, someone in another thread who had almost certainly not seen it told me it was terrible. And "it has nothing to do with gender."

Honestly, my issue with it is that you have to see Captain Marvel, Ms. Marvel and Wandavision for this movie to work, which means this movie is for Disney+ subscribers and they're not being up front about that at all. But if people like it, fine. I'm glad they do.

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Marvel's main trick is that they make movies where you don't need to watch the others, but you get little extra credit points if you have. So I actually don't think you need to see the Disney+ show.

The real problem is either that people THINK you need to have seen the other shows/ movies, or people who haven't seen them just don't care.

Like Spiderman isn't just a superhero story, he's a multimedia IP that gets people out to see whatever he's in. The broader fan base of the main characters here just aren't as big.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Maybe in some of the movies, but with some of them, like the Dr. Strange sequel... if you didn't watch Wandavision, you would have no idea what is going on. A huge amount of it involves the aftermath of Wandavision.

[-] silverbax@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Can confirm. I read all of these stories back in the comics, saw most of the movies, but never watched Wandavision. I had no understanding of why she was suddenly the villain.

[-] jacksilver@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

To be honest I watched WandaVision and didn't really understand why she was suddenly the villian. It's like they cut a scene from the ending of WandaVision or the beginning of Doctor Strange that would have developed her motives better. But that's generally the issue right now (in my opinion), they aren't spending enough time developing the characters.

[-] BURN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

MoM was written before Wandavision was finalized iirc.

It felt like they just undid a ton of her plot development in the opening bits of MoM.

[-] Mbourgon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Apparently Sam Raimi never watched it, and Feige didn’t say “no, you have to”

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was very much a fan of the first Dr. Strange movie and was looking forward to the sequel, but I was not a fan of Wandavision so when I found out the movie was basically Wandavision II (with guest appearance by Dr. Strange) I just didn't bother.

This is a problem for any franchise that tries to interweave its shows too closely, as soon as one comes along that leaves a sour taste in my mouth anything else that's closely entwined with it comes with a poison pill. Having a common fictional setting is great but moderation is needed and great care must be taken not to "break" it. I've dropped out of several other franchises that I used to think I would be a life-long fan of because of modern attempts to revamp the setting that just ruined them IMO.

[-] mrnotoriousman@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Usually I can wrap up the basic plot points from a relevant show on the way to the theater. I was actually surprised this movie too scenes right out of the show to introduce the character

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I haven’t seen it either. But my daughter wants to.

[-] ImminentOrbit@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

The Marvels is the worst superhero movie I've ever seen. I'm not seen Wonder woman 1984 and have been told that that is slightly worse, but I thought this movie was trash from beginning to end.

[-] Tedesche@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago

🤢🤮

this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2023
10 points (53.4% liked)

News

23265 readers
3724 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world