this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
609 points (99.2% liked)

politics

25002 readers
3095 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 183 points 4 days ago (5 children)

We LOVE Fucking Children! Whether with GROWN MAN PENIS or DEFUNDING EDUCATION or Legalizing CHILD LABOR us Republicans LOVE Fucking Children!

-LITERALLY, NO JOKE, EVERY SINGLE REPUBLICAN!

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 48 points 4 days ago

Save the children [for us].

[–] BossDj@piefed.social 32 points 4 days ago

"If they're old enough for sex, they're old enough for work." Republican logic.

Also reminder that 100% of all Republican logic begins with a fallacy

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

They also enjoy using them for their sexual enjoyment

Children for Republicans serve all their carnal purposes

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That's the "GROWN MAN PENIS" bit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DaveRussell@stranger.social 79 points 4 days ago (2 children)

@Redditsux At what point do liberals realize Fox News is how conservative psychopaths float ideas? This one is beyond the pale. If conservatives had brains, they would realize the wealthy are trying to recreate slavery through inadequate education, low wages, and limited opportunities to move to better places to work. On top of that, they seem really fond of raping our kids, if the defense of Trump is any indication. Conservatives are the main problem.

[–] Photuris@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The problem is, we all know what the most effective solution to ever-growing “conservative” (reactionary) terror is, but nobody wants to say it (i.e., it’s how our forebears handled the Nazis and the Confederates).

Nobody wants to go there, though, because that’s a bell that cannot be unrung. And, let’s face it, it’s horrible. So neolibs, actual conservatives, and left-of-center moderates are quietly clinging to the faint hope that the rubes at large will get gobsmacked by good sense and then vote themselves out of this mess soon. I want that, too, but I’m not so optimistic.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 14 points 4 days ago

How our forebearers handled the Nazis and Confederates wasn't good enough. We have to be more complete this time

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

WHO COULD HAVE SEEN THIS COMING?

[–] fodor@lemmy.zip 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What the fuck does he mean by "allow". You think the kids want to work? Dear God, the kids want to be hanging out. Maybe playing some video games or going to the pool or shit like that.

At least be honest. You want to jack up rent so high that their parents can't afford to pay it so the parents make the kids chip in. That's what you want, because you're a sick motherfucker.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Allow, as in let them work like they used to, with little to no regulation. It was never about kids wanting to work.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In my area farms and branches that employ teenagers make sure to give them the easiest work. The reason being kids are vindictive little shits who will hold onto a grudge and only enact on it when you are at serious risk of mutilation or death, sure they could pull the emergency cord on the wood chipper or they can turn the other way and pretend to hear nothing. So teenagers do sales or porter work nothing strenuous.

Also if my example seems weirdly specific that's because it's based off an incident in the 90s that is passed around as a cultural reinforcement of why you don't piss off young workers. Not to say adults won't also fuck you over but usually they have more autonomy allowing them to get it out of their system, more property damage less watching you die a pitiful death.

[–] renrenPDX@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In their fantasy, it’s not teenagers. Think more 12 and under. This was reality believe it or not, less than 100 yeas ago.

Not saying they want teenagers, moreso pointing out that if teenagers can let nature takes its course on you then literal children would do it without hesitation. Children will literally watch a building burn in fascinated calmness before thinking to call 911 would anyone want to work around that. Not the kids fault they're kids their brains aren't fully formed that means they can be socially questionable little psychos.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So instead of having the rich and powerful abuse and assault immigrants they should abuse and assault children? Maybe on an island? Is there a list?

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I heard about some Epstein list or something.

[–] Tuxman@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 days ago

Funnily, I could swear when I was a kid I’ve seen it called the “Epstain List”

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 43 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Funny how allowing the owner class to exploit children is phrased to imply it's giving children a choice. 🤮

[–] DNS@discuss.online 20 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is Republicans soft launching "children yearn for the mines" rhetoric. USA is effectively regressing and removing what originally made this country "great." I fear for my children as they grow older. I can only do so much as a parent to steer them onto a path of least hardship, but Republicans are increasingly making that difficult.

[–] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 days ago

I don't think we started out great, honestly. Our history is pretty fucking dark. I think we could have been great, and we might have even been getting close. But I absolutely agree that the progress we have made is regressing in front of our eyes. Worse, anybody who doesn't celebrate this senseless destruction is also being demonized.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

It isn't going to be their children doing it either, it will be ours.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sbbq@lemmy.zip 14 points 3 days ago

The idea of having to worry about my kids work schedule on top of school and my own shit to do in return for starvation wages? Nah, we're good.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 50 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, let's definitely go back to this.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, he really does. Earlier this year he was waxing philosophic about how showers are terrible for you and how being on a farm means you never have to bathe.

HURT: They are. I take showers if I'm going to be around people. But this is why you live on a farm. You live on a farm, you don't have to take showers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Or this. All those unaborted abandoned babies can be shoved down the chimneys.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] devolution@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

His pasty white ass should be in the fields first.

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

"You know what would make this country a better place? If we rolled back regulations to about 1912."

-Repubs

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago

Its 2025- children are for farm work and sex.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I feel like anyone suggesting this has never interacted with a child.

Perhaps surprisingly, most kids will happily pick fruit for say, 15 minutes.

If you want them to do it for 40 hours a week that's going to require some extreme motivation.

[–] womjunru@lemmy.cafe 12 points 3 days ago

Yeah and they aren’t paying well, so.. beat them?

[–] Steve@startrek.website 2 points 2 days ago

If they dont want to pick fruit maybe trump can fuck them

[–] QuoVadisHomines@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 days ago

When that doesn'twork out are they going to move to slavery?

[–] Maeve@midwest.social 8 points 3 days ago

Subsidized corpo farms: 👍👍 Subsidized small farms: 👎👎 Exploitation of the masses, including the children: 👍👍👍🥰

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 30 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Just look at those plucky young entrepreneurs living their best life:

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I really wish these assholes would think of the children less.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 15 points 3 days ago

if there was a god, and god wasn't a sick twisted evil fuck like in the bible, all these fuckers would die from horrendously painful burn damage after surviving a lightning strike

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago

His kids and grandkids first. In fact, if there aren't enough necessary workers, maybe "news" hosts should be forced into labour.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 19 points 4 days ago

There's a side effect to this which I don't think anyone is picking up: an inherent devaluing of the work that immigrants do here. They pivoted from "immigrants are criminals and rapists" to "OK, maybe some aren't, but the ones who aren't are doing work so simple your kids could do it".

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

i propose fox news hosts for hard labor

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tehn00bi@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sounds great, I can’t wait to see 10 year olds roofing my house in July.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 11 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Kids can be easily tricked by shitty supervisors to do dangerous jobs because they're not old enough to know any better. Adults are usually smart enough to see the danger in working with machines that can crush and shred you. Or with chemicals that will poison you.

Parents who offer up their kids to these businesses because they "trust them to keep their kids safe" deserve to be kicked in the groin repeatedly.

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Adults are usually smart enough to see the danger in working with machines that can crush and shred you. Or with chemicals that will poison you.

You almost had me. Most people are dumber than shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] whotookkarl@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

His kids first, fields or mines

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

The worst fucking timeline.

I guess the baby-talk "maga" means - bring back child labor. That was the time period when America was greatest?

[–] bicmay@med-mastodon.com 12 points 4 days ago
[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

"Let children do it, but not my children."

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

magas: Mass Deportation Now!

maga 1: omg I just realized if we deport all the illegulls we won't have a cheap labor force to exploit anymore!

maga 2: Hmm let's see, what other group's labor could we exploit with slave wages and no rights or benefits?

maga 1: hmmmm, durrrrrrr.

maga 2: I know! Children!

load more comments
view more: next ›