406
submitted 10 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear declared a state of emergency in Rockcastle County following a multi-car train derailment on Wednesday that his office said resulted in a chemical spill.

Around 16 train cars were involved in the incident, including two carrying molten sulfur that ended up on fire, according to CSX, which operates the train.

“At approximately 2:23pm today, a CSX train derailed north of Livingston, KY. Preliminary information indicates that at least 16 cars were involved, including two molten sulphur cars that have been breached and have lost some of their contents which is on fire,” a statement from the company to ABC News read.

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Juujian@lemmy.world 224 points 10 months ago

If only we could do something about this problem which got inexplicably worse when we worsened regulations and working conditions...

[-] czech@kbin.social 57 points 10 months ago

Consumers will choose to buy products from companies who don't spill molten sulfur so the invisible hand of the market will fix this situation any moment now.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 10 points 10 months ago

Aaaany moment now.

[-] LrdThndr@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

A few years ago, a CSX train carrying acrylonitrile had an axle snap and derailed in my town, igniting in the process, and creating a huge plume of cyanide gas. It was a damned miracle nobody was killed.

The response from CSX was impressive. I have no complaints about how they handled it AFTER it happened. However, and it only recently occurred to me, but that response that was so well oiled, rehearsed, and organized… they’ve CLEARLY had WAY too much experience doing this; way too many times they’ve had to sweep into a town and “handle” things after a derailment of a hazmat train.

Maybe… just maybe they should consider putting a little more emphasis on upgrading and maintaining their equipment. Maybe they wouldn’t have to have so many teams ready to sweep in and manage the medium-sized ecological catastrophes that happen so often.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 20 points 10 months ago

Two different teams. Sounds like the response team has some real winners on it and the maintenance team doesn't, or, lacks budget

[-] DontRedditMyLemmy@lemmy.world 29 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Cheaper to respond once in a while than to prevent fleet wide. Capitalism alone settles on cost efficacy.

[-] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 10 months ago

Maintenance teams are discouraged from marking trains and rails for maintenance because delays impact profits.

https://www.propublica.org/article/railroad-safety-union-pacific-csx-bnsf-trains-freight

Bradley Haynes and his colleagues were the last chance Union Pacific had to stop an unsafe train from leaving one of its railyards. Skilled in spotting hidden dangers, the inspectors in Kansas City, Missouri, wrote up so-called “bad orders” to pull defective cars out of assembled trains and send them for repairs.

But on Sept. 18, 2019, the area’s director of maintenance, Andrew Letcher, scolded them for hampering the yard’s ability to move trains on time.

“We’re a transportation company, right? We get paid to move freight. We don’t get paid to work on cars,” he said. “The first thing that I’m getting questioned about right now, every day, is why we’re over 200 bad orders and what we’re doing to get them down. … If I was an inspector on a train,” he continued, “I would probably let some of that nitpicky shit go.”

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

“I would probably let some of that nitpicky shit go.”

I'm guessing 'nitpicky shit' is things like 'loose wheels.'

[-] Krackalot@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 10 months ago

Perhaps we can pay large sums to the companies to fix the infrastructure, if they feel like it.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 93 points 10 months ago

Here we go again...

When molten sulfur is on fire, it releases hydrogen sulfide, a poisonous gas. So that's fun!

[-] gnomesaiyan@lemmy.world 83 points 10 months ago

Ahh yes, transporting hazardous chemicals on antiquated infrastructure. What a time to be alive.

[-] lntl@lemmy.ml 53 points 10 months ago

The free market cannot provide safe railways, they must be nationalized!

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 46 points 10 months ago

mobile molten sulpher. wtaf

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago

Yep. I live in a big train town. Molten sulfur trains pass through all the time. And don't I feel good about it!

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

My dad was working for a company that moved liquid molten steel by train every day.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 44 points 10 months ago

That's actually safer. It will only do pretty localized damage. It won't spread a huge cloud of poisonous gases.

[-] TheFriar@lemm.ee 41 points 10 months ago

Not to mention, in theory, moving something on a fixed track seems safer than any other alternatives we have. WAY safer than by truck or by plane.

If only we didn't have such an outdated and monopolized rail in this country. THAT is what makes it unsafe. Capitalism.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago

I question how much work there has been in eliminating the need to transport these sort of chemicals long distances at all. I imagine it has a lot to do with cost, which, again, is a capitalism issue.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

OK, it will cool down eventually and leave a mess that would probably a nightmare to remove, but at least no poisonous fumes, that's right.

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 10 points 10 months ago

i know people have done the math... money talks... but that seems so inefficient!

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Just imagine you have a tight spot on the map full of industry. You need to expand, but there simply is no space around the existing site. But you cannot move the original site, as it is vital to be next to the harbour. So you have to open a second site somewhere else and get the logistics right.

So just like wheat and flour moves from the farmer to the mill and on to the baker, they moved liquid steel from the blast furnaces to the foundry and rolling mill.

[-] paraphrand@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Why is molten steel transported? That sounds bonkers. I’ve never heard of it.

Is it like a cement truck situation?

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

The original plant with the blast furnaces is directly at the harbor. As this site is surrounded on all sides with other industrial zones and the cities themselves, they built new foundries and rolling mills on a second site. They get (or got, IDK) the liquid steel delivered in rail cars designed for this one purpose. Obviously they are heavily insulated, so they are "just warm" on the outside.

I have to admit that my knowledge of this is old, I don't even know if the blast furnaces are still running there...

[-] Tygr@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

I love that we’ve switched to reactionary response. US is slowly transitioning to reactionary air travel as well.

[-] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

The more we can get people to react poorly to the thought of rail lines the more government money we can funnel into highways and kick backs for the auto industry!! Woooh!

[-] Illegal_Prime@dmv.social 3 points 10 months ago

Aviation has always been reactionary. Change comes from finding the cause of accidents, and unfortunately it’s somewhat difficult to do until after that type of accident happens. In the 60s and 70s it was common for passenger jets to just crash in to mountains when there was nothing wrong with them. We implemented better navigational technology, and warning systems that detect obstacles in the plane’s path to prevent this from happening.

[-] reverendsteveii@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

Everyone who is harmed by this is a sacrifice the government was willing to make in order to maximize profits for their owners.

[-] BluJay320@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 10 months ago
[-] Mirshe@lemmy.world 54 points 10 months ago

Not entirely. Derailments like this were pretty much expected to increase at...right about this point after Reagan deregulated the entire rail industry. Take away any expectations of the railways to maintain their rails, cars, or engines, and couple that with an industry that believes in cutting everything to the bone in order to maximize profits in a way that's almost unrivaled, and you get this happening more and more. Already before this, railways in the US were averaging 1000+ freight derailments per year over the last decade - to put this in perspective, the entire EU averages half that in a year for their freight network.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

There is an oil pipeline runs under the Mackinac Bridge in the great lakes. The pipeline is 70 years old, 20 years past its end-of-life. Majority of Michiganders are against replacing it and want it shut down before the inevitable happens. The oil company and the nation of Canada oppose this because $$$. Now that it looks like it will be shut down the oil company is finally suggesting replacing it (they could have 20 years ago and probably got a 50yr extension too). The fact that it wasn't automatically shut down 20 years ago and the previous governments decided to roll the dice is unbelievable. We can live without the oil but if it ruptures then it will devastate our environment. I wish the US govt took this and these train derailments with the seriousness they deserve.

[-] hpca01@programming.dev 12 points 10 months ago

Seems all the problems in this country can be traced back to that fuck.

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 3 points 10 months ago

Regan probably had a hand in 9/11 at this point, it's the only thing that makes sense, lol.

[-] schmidtster@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Is that not expected when you have 224k miles of rail vs 94k? Doesn’t the US also move vastly more in their network?

The only way to legitimately compare them would be for incidence per travelled mile. Saying they have double the incidences with over twice the rail is almost bordering on propaganda without the right metrics.

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 1 points 10 months ago

This is not a safe standard, because it allows more total incidents if there is more mileage. The goal should be as few incidents as possible regardless of the amount of rail. You are doing what your insurance company does to you and your family.

[-] schmidtster@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

If a place has 10x the population and only 5x the rate, it’s half the incident rate. That is safer no how you try and twist it.

500 incidences with 1 million people is far safer than 500 incidences with 500k.

You say I’m doing what the insurance companies are doing, yet you’re the one actually perpetuating biased information. I’m pointing out that people are being lied to, and you claiming I’m wrong is what’s wrong with the world. You believe this propaganda lmfao.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] snippyfulcrum@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

Can also confirm that a pretty big one happened before Trump: the one that happened in Brooks, KY in 2007.

The whole area smelled funky for a couple years after the derailment... And was also CSX.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brooks_derailment

[-] bioemerl@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago

right about this point

40 years later?

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

He should declare a state of emergency regarding the general safety of the trains instead.

this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
406 points (98.8% liked)

News

22890 readers
2775 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS