this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
509 points (99.2% liked)

News

31889 readers
2890 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

WASHINGTON (AP) — Federal prosecutors have failed to obtain a felony indictment against a man who was seen on camera hurling a sandwich at a federal law enforcement official in the nation’s capital, a person familiar with the matter told The Associated Press.

Sean Charles Dunn was arrested on an assault charge after he threw a sub-style sandwich at a Customs and Border Protection agent. A video of the incident went viral, and shortly after he was fired from the Justice Department, where he worked as an international affairs specialist in the department’s criminal division.

The case is one of the examples of the legal pushback to President Donald Trump’s law enforcement surge in Washington that has led to more than 1,000 arrests. It is highly unusual for grand jurors to refuse to return an indictment, and it was once said that prosecutors could persuade a grand jury to “indict a ham sandwich.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He's being charged with Assault With a Deli Weapon.

Credit: Jimmy Dore

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Which he stole from some random news anchor... Dore hasn't been funny or relevant in almost a decade now.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

He stole the sandwich from a news anchor?

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

Who's on first...

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago
[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 24 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

Last time I reacted to this Pirro quote by saying it was indeed very funny:

“He thought it was funny,” Ms. Pirro said of the defendant in a video posted online. “Well, he doesn’t think it’s funny today, because we charged with him with a felony.”

I just want to say, it has gone up a level to "hilarious" now that they can't even get a grand jury on their side

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

And there's that saying that a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich.... oh the irony.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 1 hour ago

The Grand Jury were vegans.

[–] jacksilver@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

That was their mistake, they should have charged the sandwich.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 34 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

shortly after he was fired from the Justice Department, where he worked as an international affairs specialist in the department’s criminal division

The cop, who investigates cops, was so pissed off that he just threw the first thing he could get a hold of...

I can't even come up with a proper analogy for how far off the rails this is.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 7 hours ago

It's good to know there might be some people like that still in there...

If you've seen the video, you'd see that this man was pissed. Full of righteous anger... And everyone else on the street, including the people filming, just thought it was funny. Just fucking clueless.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The cop, who investigates cops

That's internal affairs. Your quote says international affairs.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Whoops... You're right.

I'm using the fact that I've been awake for 20 hours as an excuse for my lack of reading abilities.

I shall leave my mistake there to remind me to go to sleep. (After Doom scrolling for a few hours...)

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 hours ago

Easy mistake to make, even with a full night's sleep

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Suck the footlong fascists.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 hours ago

The new US foot is now 2.5".

[–] wulrus@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

For some reason I thought that a sandwich thrower is a device, like a sandwich maker.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Hoagie Cannon

[–] KingPorkChop@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

We can make one. Like one of those t-shirt canons.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 25 points 12 hours ago

"Public safety operation."

Way to buy into the bullshit, there, AP.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 26 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck AP for calling this a “public safety operation”. That is absolutely not a neutral way to report this. Fascist loving bootlickers. AP is a right wing rag.

[–] Corelli_III@midwest.social 2 points 4 hours ago

they've been pushing very hard for fascism lately, i can't stand the AP

[–] desmosthenes@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

8 years for spitting on a fed?!

[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 3 hours ago

The lengthy prison sentence is to send a message to the populace.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 134 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

"public safety operation"

Journalists are going to sanitize their own executions. Wish we had a real Fourth Estate that would challenge political branding rather than stenograph it.

[–] Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 hours ago

Reuters just did that.

IDF bombed a reuters journalist, but they reported what IDF said as the headline, claiming their target was a Hamas camera... It was their camera.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 hours ago

Journalists are going to sanitize their own executions.

Already happening in Gaza

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 79 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

This is why one of their major targets is due process.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 49 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Fucking maddening how so many Latinos voted for Trump because "they got in the right way", not realising that they'd end up getting randomly stopped and deported "because they fit the profile".

It never pays to throw in your lot with white supremicists, they'll always turn on you.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Counterpoint: fuck them and their ignorance?

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

I mean.....I don't think you can say they'll turn on you. That implies they supported you at one point.

White supremicists have ALWAYS been against you, if you're not also white, male, and a white supremicist.

Just because you support them, does not mean they support you. To modify a George Carlin quote:

"It's a big club, and you ~~ain't in it~~ don't want to be in it."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] axus@lemmy.ca 22 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Mild doxx, I've served on a DC Grand Jury before. You're commuting to the courthouse for 3 weeks minimum, though only 3 days a week. Most of the people are not getting compensated from their job to be there, just some money for the Metro.

The standard of evidence to indict is much lower, basically "it's believable that the accused could be guilty of the charges". Caught on camera is quite believable, the key here is "the charges". If the charges don't fit the crime, a jury that's paying attention wouldn't indict . I'm 80% sure indictment is a majority vote, didn't have to be unanimous.

Generally the prosecution is presenting evidence and calling law enforcement officers to testify, the defendant sending a lawyer is optional (expensive). You get a mostly one-sided argument, but these are all people who live in DC; some well off but most kinda poor. It's DC so both categories do not like Trump. If they believe somebody is committing crimes in DC they'll happily indict; but most cases indict, it feels good to cancel the case when someone doesn't deserve it.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 7 hours ago

This dude, himself, worked at the Justice Department. I'm sure he was able to get some very good representation.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 11 hours ago

i have heard serving on a grand jury is painful, because its such a long lenght of time, thats why people try to avoid it all cost.

[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 75 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Everyone finishes watching the video.

Prosecutor: So, you can clearly see the assault take place. Does everyone agree?

Jurors: I didn't see anything. Did you guys see anything? Nope. Not a thing. Who wants a sandwich?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 12 hours ago

he was 'eating the sandwich'.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I'd like a sandwich, but I didn't see any laws broken

[–] Remember_the_tooth@lemmy.world 16 points 16 hours ago

All I saw was a hero.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 60 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

This just in: Grand Jury fails to indict a ham sandwich.

[–] azimir@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 hours ago

It was a salami sandwich, so it's a case of misidentification.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 34 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

They didn't fail. They did their job.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RegularJoe@lemmy.world 17 points 17 hours ago

Federal Prosecutors used Felony Indictment against sandwich tosser.

It's not very effective...

[–] neuracnu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

This is all hilarious of course, but that sandwich thrower would probably be dead if he wasn’t white.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mkwt@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago

In semi-related news, the DC spitter had charges reduced to misdemeanors after 3 different grand juries returned no true bill. In federal court, there is a 30 day deadline after arrest to secure an indictment or your felony charges get dismissed.

load more comments
view more: next ›