this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2025
533 points (99.3% liked)

News

32020 readers
3840 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

"First they came for the transgenders' guns, but I didn't speak up because I'm not transgender..."

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 13 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Yep.. well 2nd amendment folks are hypocrites apparently. Shocker.

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think Trump is popular for this. The NRA has already come out publicly they are against this. Rednecks hate trans people but they hate anyone who threatens to take guns away from citizens more it looks like.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, I had a feeling that would happen.

[–] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 7 points 7 hours ago
[–] Furbag@lemmy.world 25 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

A republican shoots up a school and nobody sees any issue with Republican ideology, but the second a trans person does we've gotta take away the guns, right?

Lefties and trans folk, arm up. If you haven't bought your piece yet, start the application process. Once you have it, it becomes almost impossible for them to take it away by force.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I think you mean the only way they'll take it is by force, and they will if they choose to do so. You aren't going to stop a SWAT team (or worse.)

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 hours ago

It's not about stopping a specific incident. It's about sowing enough fear in their little piggy hearts that they think twice.

Personally I'm more worried about a caravan of lifted F250s with MAGA flags rolling through my neighborhood but everyones threat model is a little different.

It's ok, I have 2

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 13 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Dems be like: "I allow it"

Remember: "Under no pretext should arms and ammunition be surrendered; any attempt to disarm the workers must be frustrated, by force if necessary." -Karl Marx

Armed Minorities are harder to oppress.

[–] BlueCanoe@lemmy.ca 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Dems are okay with this?

e: I’ll take that as a no

[–] Scrizzle@lemmy.zip 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Fun twist… NRA is like “hell nah!”

[–] Pat_Riot@lemmy.today 2 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Originally the NRA was super against people actually carrying firearms around.

[–] Scrizzle@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 hours ago

Originally, Republicans were against gun control.

[–] myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip 5 points 8 hours ago

If this is allowed to happen. This will just be the start.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

Trans people are statistically underrepresented among mass shooters. If we are targeting high risk demographics we should start with white men.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Time to buy lots of guns and ammo everyone

[–] canajac@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Do you think 400 million guns were bought by only repubs?

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Where is the NRA? First trans then unpardoned felons, the homeless, the unemployed poor people. The list goes on. Once in place, adding another group will not be questioned.

[–] Scrizzle@lemmy.zip 8 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

The NRA already said they cannot support this and stand against the sweeping ban of firearms.

Per their tweet:

The Second Amendment isn't up for debate.

The NRA supports the Second Amendment rights of all law abiding Americans to purchase, possess and use firearms.

NRA does not, and will not, support any policy proposals that implement sweeping gun bans that arbitrarily strip law-abiding citizens of their Second Amendment rights without due process.

Sep 05 2025 Source

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

rare NRA W, imo.

I think this kills it. NRA is one of the sacred cows of the Republican party, they don't dare defy them.

[–] DNS@discuss.online 3 points 5 hours ago

You mean the NRA is a golden funnel that received money from Russia to funnel into republican politicians to buy their vote to promote Russian interests.

[–] iridebikes@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

They do this and the motives for violence only increase. How long until the next high profile assassination?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 9 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

Trans folks, get your guns while you can. They might be the difference between freedom or going to RFK's "wellness" farms. As an autistic who will someday be targeted, I intend to stand on the line of battle with you.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 hours ago

the brain worm was Substance D all along..

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

This is going to result in either the left arming themselves in a way that will give them political power comparable to the right.

Or the courts will set a legal precedent for gun control regulations.

While I'm disgusted by the fact that it's a targeted act of persecution, this could be the Trump DOJ setting up a long-term win for the left.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Gun control would not be a win for anyone, especially not on the left.

[–] obsoleteacct@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

IDK, I consider myself pretty far left, and generally pro 2A, but I'd be OK with some gun control. I feel like you can grasp the political value of firearms, and also not want a paranoid schizophrenic with a history of violence to have unfettered access to firearms.

I think as a society we can walk and chew gum, and I don't think that makes me Hillary Clinton.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago

Liberals love gun control

Leftists do not

[–] canajac@lemmy.ca 1 points 8 hours ago

So no gun for Eric trump. sad

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 8 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Ahah, the US right finally found someone that they don't want armed to the teeth.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

I'm sure they have a whole list, this just happens to be their favored first domino

[–] potato_wallrus@lemmy.world 24 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

What part if "shall not be infringed" do these fuckers not understand?

[–] InputZero@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ah see you're making a common mistake when reading the law. Republican's shall not be infringed, Democrats shall be infringed. It's a common mistake to assume the Republicans will respect others rights, they don't. They want all the rights for themselves and laws to apply to everyone else.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 4 points 10 hours ago

An in-group whom the law protects but does not bind, and an out-group whom the law binds but does not protect.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›