this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2025
56 points (96.7% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

6035 readers
419 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. Use spoiler tags in comments, and NSFW checkbox for posts.
This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Saw this recently and thought it was interesting. Jellico, the character, was a way to justify changes the cast wanted to make on the show.

Other folks might know this already, but it was new to me. πŸ––

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I wonder which actor wanted Enterprise to switch to a four-shift rotation.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

just for the record if you're running a 24/7 outfit with a an A/B, C/D shift rotation actually kinda makes sense. Three days on for 12 hour shifts, 4 days off, then you flip that with 4 days on and three days off. Though, I'd assume they would be running on a time system similar to submarines.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I thought the 3/4 shift rotation meant how many shifts in a 24-hr period. That there were simply 3 shifts of 8 hours each, and when they changed it to 4 shift rotation the shifts got reduced to 6 hours lengths. That made sense to me at the time since it meant the crews would be cycling out a little more often so the people at their posts were a little more rested and relaxed

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Shorter shifts can mean more rested people, but it can also mean more handoffs between this shift and next shift, which means more disruptions and more opportunities for miscommunication and mistakes. I hear this is why nurses have such long shifts: because it’s been shown that patients actually die abnormally often around shift changes.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

so the continuity of care does play a role in that. But it's also because hospitals are cheap bastards and longer shifts reduces staffing requirements.

a traditional 5-day work week with 3 shifts per day, on a 24/7 operational time results in 6 full shifts plus staffing for covering absences. A 12 hour shift a/b, c/d rotation has four full shifts plus coverage, just as an example.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I didn’t understand the math in your second paragraph. Could you explain again? I don’t have any prior familiarity with shift planning.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I'm going to use a 24 clock here, just to make it a bit more obvious. (am/pm is annoying on a 24 hour rotation.)

most place use something like a 09:00-17:00 shift. (or 07:00-15:00, etc.) "full time" is 40 hours a week in the US, and we get there working five days a week (monday through friday). For types of jobs that go 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, that falls into three shifts- First shift starts ant 09:00, second at 17:00, and third shift starts at 01:00

for every position, if you want round-the clock coverage, Monday through Friday, you typically have one full time person for each shift. 3 people. You then have shifts on the weekends- Saturday and Sunday; because overtime is a big no-no; that's another 3 people. So for a single position, working "typical" 8 hour shift rotations, you're going to need 6 people. (and, 3 of them are going to have high turn over as they move into positions that are full time. which can be quite problematic.)

one way of doing things differently is to have four shifts that are 12 hours long. A/B and C/D are paired together. A and C are both day shift and B and D are night shift. the two pairs alternate between 3 days on and 4 days off, and 4 days on and three days off.

because there's no part-timers on the payroll, it reduces overall turnover, and the contingent costs associated with onboarding. you've also cut your on-going continuing education costs by a third. when you're talking across hundreds of nurses, that actually adds up enough to justify the 4 hours of overtime everyone gets. But even that can be avoided- many places that technically have a 'you must be paid overtime' frequently have exceptions for 12 hour shift rotations. (which generate an extra 4 hours of overtime every two weeks, in this example)

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Just because your mention of sub watch schedules incited me to look it up and I found it interesting: here’s the wiki page

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is an insane amount of psychology involved in a USN's submarine watch rotation. A large part of it is designed to keep people busy (or sleeping) so they're not thinking about how much the world wants them dead for thinking it's a good idea to float around crushing pressure of the depths in what is basically a giant sardine can.

(and lets be honest, we all have a vested interest in them not going insane from huffing their own farts.)

Yeah, submariners are for sure a… special breed.

[–] electric@lemmy.world 15 points 2 weeks ago

I never knew this, thanks for sharing.

The fish tank removal's reason makes a ton of sense. I was so confused at first though, because I didn't even remember a fish tank until I saw the little coral in one of the backgrounds of the scenes they featured. I guess I registered it as some coral-like statue or plant in my mind.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago

Why would the cast care what the shift change was?

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

I still don't like Jellico.

also, being altruistic towards the dumb fish... what were they gonna do with it?

Give to Ryker for one of his cheftanista nights?

[–] teft@piefed.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They could store the fish in Cetacean Ops until they can transport it to a suitable environment to live free.

Or give it to Miles to buffer. He needs the practice.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I bet there's a few cetaceans that would enjoy the snack.

[–] teft@piefed.social 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

A lionfish? They're venomous so it'd have to be a pretty ballsy cetacean.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

It's Star Trek. we're talking about whales swimming around a starship hybrid for marine and land based earth-life. I would have to assume they've learned how to use tools- and make tools that are appropriate for their anatomy. (maybe along the lines of telepathically controlled robots a la David brin's Startide Rising.)

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

a lion fish.

Which, for the record, they're invasive to florida (iirc,) and certain groups are trying to encourage anglers/restaurants to use them as food. (hence the quip about ryker cooking it.)

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

That tiny little fish that was in the tank in the captains ready room? Does he end up replacing it when he returns from the mission?

The Captain (real ass Captain, ze French one) gets Borged and is gone for an unspecified length of time. It was a season ending and beginning 2 parter so we can build head canon about what happened to Livingston during The Jellico Jihad and after Picard was rescued and resumed his post. I like to think he was living in a huge, fancy tank at Picard's chateau on Earth with his own tank peasant to look after him. Tropical fish tanks are a ton of work, making that little fish a job creator!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think so? it was in the ready room in First Contact. apparently it died in the crash for Generations. (and Moore joked that Spot had to eat something before Data could get back.)

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Picard had a lion fish in his tank, and Jellico removed it.

[–] tacotroubles@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago

Ah yiss. love on screen changes that have character/actor based logic behind them

[–] b34k@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

TIL: a lot == 2

[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure everyone has seen this, right?

[–] PastelKeystone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] slingstone@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I hesitated to mention it because it was so old, but it's singlehandedly responsible for me coming to appreciate Jellico and look a little more deeply at the characters.