this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
203 points (98.1% liked)

politics

26077 readers
3425 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 37 points 1 day ago

This whole thing is based on one guy's speculation. Hegseth isn't going anywhere. Trump only wants one thing from Hegseth: to give the order to fire on American citizens, if and when the time arrives, and Trump knows Hegseth will do it. He doesn't care about any of the rest of it.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Did Pete leak this in a Signal chat?

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Whiskey Leaks strikes again.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago

No, he's clean on opsec

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 112 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The warning shot came from The Daily Beast’s Washington bureau chief David Gardner, who says the Pentagon boss’s tenure is on life support after months of missteps, messy leaks, and a media meltdown that has the press corps bolting from the building.

No one could have foreseen this kind of behavior from a raging alcoholic!

[–] the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know many raging alcoholics and only a few of them are as stupid as Leaky Pete.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

How many of them are placed in positions of such power that they can even exercise the same amount of stupidity? If I say that someone should die, that's dumb, but nowhere as dumb as some influential person saying it, let alone a high-ranking official, let alone the official in charge of the designated people-killers.

[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago

To be fair, his vast experience as a Fox News host surely impacted his competence.

[–] criss_cross@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago

I will believe it when I see him gone.

Dude has survived so many colossal fuck ups that I’m convinced he’s staying forever

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Now do RFK, Jr. before he kills the whole country.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Dr. Oz, you're up!

[–] hateisreality@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago
[–] vividspecter@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

And Brendan Carr.

[–] Burninator05@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] krooklochurm@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Why not Zoieberg?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (3 children)

He'll find more incompetent bootlickers for this kind of jobs.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This. He's already dug through the bottom of the barrel. And started scraping the bottom of hell.

[–] bcgm3@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Wait til you see what's under the barrel.

[–] Asafum@feddit.nl 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"We're totally against DEI hires, we demand that MERIT determine who gets chosen for a position. That's why it is my great pleasure to announce Barron Trump will be Hesgeths replacement at the Department of War."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Eric Trump starting to salivate

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 40 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)
[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't know if I want to know, but... 🤦🏼‍♂️ Why is he wet? 🤢🫩

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Pete Hegseth, nominated by President Donald Trump for Secretary of Defense, is undergoing increased examination concerning his previous actions following the reappearance of a video from Fox News' All American New Year Live in 2023. In the footage, Hegseth, 44, is shown sipping champagne straight from the bottle and submerging himself in a tank allegedlyfilled with alcohol during the live transmission from Nashville.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

FFS. 🫩😶‍🌫️

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

You can see it in the article. He got sent down in a dunk tank, filled with champagne of all things.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 25 points 2 days ago

"This is the quietest room I've ever seen."

That's the real reason Hegseth is being dumped.

[–] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 46 points 2 days ago

"Damn it Hegseth, I thought you said we could convince the military to shoot the American citizens I don't like...I mean...antifa."

"I was sure calling them fat would work sir..."

"You're fired Hegseth! Now...who can I get that will be able to convince the military to shoot their own friends and families...can't be that hard."

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I doubt that he's being fired for incompetence. For one, he was clearly never hired for competence. He was hired for being a familiar face and a sycophant like all the others. For another, he's far from the only incompetent and embarassing cabinet member in the regime. I think Pete got a bit too big for his britches for Trump. He's the only one in the administration that I think could actually get a fair amount of the MAGA cult to follow him personally after Trump's demise and would have been in a prime position to attempt a coup on Vance if and when that happens. Trump likely doesnt give a shit what happens after he's bounced from this plane of existence, but he might see Hegseth as a threat sooner rather than later.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

A bit of both I'd say - the way the article characterizes it, and you.

I'm wondering if Trump is now at that stage (of senility) where straighter heads have it easier to steer him, or make better decisions in his name. Where people don't obey him whenever he shouts "You're fired!", or he doesn't do it so much anymore.

In any case, watching the MAGA monster baby grow up into a fully grown tyranny is pretty terrifying.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago

We are at the point where trying to look at things through the lens of competence vs. incompetence is just the wrong paradigm

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Trump vowed to avoid the revolving door chaos of his first term, promising cabinet secretaries a full year to prove they could deliver. That grace period, Gardner suggested, is about to expire.

A FOX anchor is ill suited to run the DoD. Color me shocked. To avoid chaos you need to employ competent people I guess.

Who else will turn out to be useless.

But more importantly: who will they replace them with? It's not like MAGA is completely unable to learn from its mistakes.

Anyhow, I hope for more happy infighting!

[–] bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 days ago

A full year? That's more than 33 Mooches!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PMmeTrebuchets@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't tickle my (metaphorical) balls here FFS get rid of the man

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 11 points 2 days ago

Frying pan > fire

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

'first to go'? Who wrote this lol there's been a few already.

[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The article actually specifies it’s regarding the major cabinet positions and that supposedly they were supposed to actually get a full year in position before he would start firing them, as opposed to his first term.

I would have thought the first to go were the three he nominated... but regardless you would think that when your hire someone, especially for such a position, that they stick around for more than a year huh

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 day ago

Newest purge just dropped.

[–] discosnails@lemmy.wtf 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hopefully straight to the wood chipper.

[–] Tronn4@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Straight to the guillotine

[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just have him and RFK switch places. Imagine Hegseth selling protein powder and RFK rambling about the sperm of soldiers.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I’m not sure how but you made me chuckle at this shit show. Good on you!!

At least the fat shaming makes more sense at HHS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

But, but, but - he was right out of central casting.

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem here is they’re likely going to appoint someone more competent and psychopathic.

Competence is at odds with Trump's loyalty demands.

load more comments
view more: next ›