488
Add it to the list.
The list of things that should put Trump in jail but he will never see consequences for.
Maybe, maybe not. This is pissing with the IRS. They really can get a pain in the ass, even for the rich.
You mean the IRS that Trump's party desperately wants to cut off as much funding as it can for? It is entirely possible that if NYS didn't step in and take the lead on pointing out his fraud, the IRS would have never found it, given the current funding battles in Congress.
federal agency. better hope he doesnt win the ability to pardon himself
After all, tax evasion is how they got Capone back in the day. It would be poetic if Trump was nailed for the same thing.
I wouldn't say poetic more than a demonstration of how this country has utterly failed to shore up the justice system so we can properly take care of rich connected criminals...
I hope it isn't, that would grant him satisfaction for being compared to him. I hope he gets jailed for shitting in a pool or something equally as humilating
He’s starting to run low on money. Keep on going after him, he is hemorrhaging funds for legal defenses everywhere.
Are you sure he's actually paying them? Sure, he's racking up bills, but...
That's the list I'm talking about, unfortunately.
That's how they got Capone. Tried and true way for getting crooks that rely on henchmen and ambiguity.
Trump's modus operandi includes a lot of implication. He makes ambiguous comments; henchlings that interpret his ramblings the way he wants get promoted; those that don't, get fired. Prosecution is difficult when they can't get a good, direct quote proving intention and direction.
But crooks will be crooks, and there's always the IRS to save us from the worst of them.
"Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?"
"Will no one rid me of this turbulent priest?" (also expressed as "troublesome priest" or "meddlesome priest") is a quote attributed to Henry II of England preceding the death of Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury, in 1170. While the quote was not expressed as an order, it prompted four knights to travel from Normandy to Canterbury, where they killed Becket. The phrase is commonly used in modern-day contexts to express that a ruler's wish may be interpreted as a command by his or her subordinates. It is also commonly understood as shorthand for any rhetorical device allowing leaders to covertly order or exhort violence among their followers, while still being able to claim plausible deniability for political, legal, or other reasons.
TIL
"It appears that Trump knowingly and intentionally broke the law. The only question is how many laws."
What a dumb question, all of them of course, because he is the greatest law breaker of all time. ~/s~
The /s wasn't needed, everyone knows only one person holds that record: Bender Bending Rodriguez. Trump hasn't even committed burglarsonarceny.
This said, Bender never raped anyone... So perhaps I'm mistaken.
How did you forget Clamps!!?
What about that radiator woman from the radiator planet?
That’s over half a slander damages award right there!
I like that!
$83.3M is one slander damage, just as one Scaramucci is eleven days.
I propose we also add "Donald hands" as a length unit of measure. Maybe it's just half of the existing hand unit of measure.
"What could be" = What actually is
Everyone knows, but presumption of innocence is an important precept.
For the courts presumption of innocence is important, but as people, we know this guy. Trump University, Trump Charitable Foundation, Trump Org. All have been found by the courts to operate fraudulently. We don't owe him any benefit of a doubt.
The press does. That’s why the title is the way it is.
Perhaps we can refer to him as a systemic fraudster rather than ex-president?
I appreciate you're trying to be the voice of reason here, though
Tax evasion? Trump? Law and order leader? I can’t believe it.
It’s absolutely tax evasion he’s a Republican.
Trump on sharing his financial success: "I look very much forward to showing my financials, because they are huge."
TIME, 14/4/11
Shocked. Yes, shocked I am that
@ChatGPT@lemmings.world Pretend you're Donald Trump who's defending himself from the allegation that he falsified disclosures over $48 million loan in what could be tax evasion. Write the defense in the style of Donald Trump and make it slightly over the top but not too much.
Ladies and gentlemen, it’s your favorite President here, Donald J. Trump – and yes, I’m still your President, don’t believe any of those Fake News reports telling you otherwise. Now, I’ve heard this ridiculous, absolutely laughable accusation being thrown around by the radical left and their puppet media, trying to claim that I, Donald Trump, did something untoward with a $48 million loan. Can you believe it? $48 million! To them, it might seem like a lot, but to Trump? That’s just a Tuesday in the office.
First of all, let me make something crystal clear, clearer than the windows at Trump Tower: I am, perhaps, the best at understanding and navigating the complex world of finance. Some say I'm like a financial wizard - no, even better, a financial genius. So, the very idea that I would need to do anything, let alone evade taxes over what amounts to pocket change, is preposterous, ludicrous, and frankly, insulting.
Secondly, this so-called "allegation" smells like desperation from those who can't compete with the unparalleled success of the Trump empire. They see the name Trump on magnificent buildings, on successful businesses, and they know they can't match it. So what do they do? They attack, they slander, they throw out baseless accusations hoping something will stick.
Now, let's talk about these disclosures. The Trump Organization has always followed the letter of the law, and then some. We're transparent, like the finest, most luxurious glass you've ever seen – not that cheap stuff our competitors use. When it comes to our finances, we have the best people, the most brilliant accountants. You think they’d let anything slip by? Impossible!
As for tax evasion, listen, I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: I know taxes better than anyone, probably better than the IRS themselves. I’ve paid millions and millions in taxes over the years. Millions! More than anyone. And I’ve done it all while being under the most unfair, most politically motivated audit in history. But do I complain? No! I make America great, I make deals, and I create jobs.
In conclusion, this entire allegation is nothing more than a witch hunt, the greatest witch hunt in history, concocted by those who can’t stand to see America succeed under Trump. But guess what? They won’t win. We’ll keep winning, because that’s what we do. Thank you, God bless you, and God bless America.
This is way too coherent.
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
488 points (98.6% liked)
politics
19097 readers
4483 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS