244
and claimed that Omar's constituents are “breeding like rabbits. I guess they've never heard of something called birth control.
You mean the thing Republicans want to make illegal next?
Yeah. The irony is huge there.
Oh, that’s just for non-wealthy white people. The “low iq” people will get forcible sterilization.
Incorrect. The low-IQ people will be forced to breed (while being denied any form of support) so the factories have a limitless pool of workers to exploit.
Yeah, but their racism one other bigotry plays a role, especially with the wannabe Nazis at hand. Forcible sterilization has been done before.
Used as a means of controlling “undesirable” populations – immigrants, people of color, poor people, unmarried mothers, the disabled, the mentally ill – federally-funded sterilization programs took place in 32 states throughout the 20th century.
Recently, too
https://bpr.berkeley.edu/2020/11/04/americas-forgotten-history-of-forced-sterilization/
In early September [2020], a nurse working at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) detention center in Georgia came forward […] claiming that numerous involuntary hysterectomies (uterus removal surgeries) were performed on detained immigrant women.
Throughout the 20th century, nearly 70,0000 people (overwhelmingly working-class women of color) were sterilized in over 30 states. Black women, Latina women, and Native American women were specifically targeted. From the 1930s to the 1970s, nearly one-third of the women in Puerto Rico, a U.S. territory, were coerced into sterilization when government officials claimed that Puerto Rico’s economy would benefit from a reduced population.
I also believe in IQ science.
Specifically the science showing that conservatives have low IQs.
Really interesting! Particularly that it's childhood intelligence, not adult, that determines later prejudice, suggesting that racist outlooks are deeply ingrained and set early in life. It's not clear if the second analysis considers contemporary reasoning skills, but I also suspect early and adult intelligence are highly correlated
It’s also important to keep in mind that a lot of intelligence testing is meant for use on children. It’s a lot easier to gauge “how developed is your brain compared to what we expect at your age” than “how smart is this 25 year old”.
load more comments
(1 replies)
You really shouldn't. IQ is mostly bullshit, the only thing it measures accurately is how well you do in an IQ test.
Exactly. An Amazonian hunter-gatherer might be a genius. He might be able to do all sorts of prodigy-level things if he were raised in a modern Western society. And maybe as it is, he's the best hunter-gatherer in his tribe because of how smart he is.
But give him an IQ test (for the purposes of this thought experiment you're somehow able to do it despite him not knowing how to read) and he could very likely fail it simply because it is based on a Western view of the world for which he has no frame of reference.
I once did a music video for a guy who was the most amazing country music fiddle player you would have ever seen. Like fantastic complex improvisations when he played. I don't even like much country and I was blown away. When we had him sign the contract, he could barely write his own name.
Was he a genius or was he an idiot? Was his IQ high or low?
for the purposes of this thought experiment you’re somehow able to do it despite him not knowing how to read
Don't worry, there's plenty of precedent for giving IQ tests to people in languages they can't read and then judging them for doing badly at it!
Was the guy's name Johnny and did he win a fiddle battle against the devil
It was not and he did not, but he definitely played fiddle far better than Charlie Daniels.
Every time I hear that song I think the devil played it better. ;-p
load more comments
(1 replies)
Laura really isn't in a position to insult anyone else's intelligence.
https://www.boredpanda.com/fake-slashed-tire-tweet-laura-loomer/
God, I just posted that same link like two days ago.
Their "IQ by race" schtick doesn't even hold up to the most basic questioning, let alone actual science.
They want to claim it's okay to abuse and enslave black people because they've got a chart that says they have the lowest average IQ.
But they seem to mysteriously lose all interest in the idea when you suggest removing race from it entirely and just testing individuals directly, shipping anyone below a threshold off to a concentration camp.
Since it was their idea, it seems only fair that we start by testing the nazis and their closest friends and family.
Deep down, they know their ranks would be decimated.
IQ by "race" discredits IQ (and biological determinism)
Ask: what is a 'black person' or a 'white person', and you'll find social categories, not biological ones. So, the fact that IQ consistently finds differences between these groups proves that it's not a measure of biological quantity.
It'd be like IQ testing showed that blondes really were dimmer than their peers, but the effect held for bottle blondes as well.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
My god, this story just keeps getting better
They debunked her at every single attempt for her to double down on the "slashing" that was beautiful, she's definitely an attention seeking fascist POS.
😳 I think that tire lived through ~~Watergate.~~ ~~the civil rights era~~ the space race.
I live in Omar's district and I can tell you first hand, it's possibly the most gentrified district in the state. If there's anything wrong with the it, it's us white people.
I drive through every day, there’s plenty of niche little places that are fun in the area. (Coming up cedar ave, for example.)
Definitely white people ruining it. “Oh you have art and culture. That now belongs to us.”
Hell yeah. I’ve been to some great shows at Triple Rock and then we’d go eat at the falafel place up the street.
Dr. Henry "Indiana" Jones: This belongs in a museum!
Proceeds to fuck up the natives while "liberating" their literal god
Like I'm gonna trust some Somalian to tell me the demographics of their district. /s
Loomer is a horrid shitstain.
Excuse me, excuse me. She didn’t put herself -- and you have some very bad people in that group, but you also have people that were very fine people, on both sides. You have people in that group. Excuse me, excuse me. I read the same article as you did. You have people in that group that are there to protest to them, a very, very important issue.
Cromulent.
Crepuscular.
Corpulent
Voluble.
Vomitescent.
Emetic?
You’re a tick? How curious.
You can tell by the things coming out of her asshole mouth.
I read the summary and I thought that's pretty vile. I read the whole article and feel like I need a shower.
Woah woah woah I thought they were pro-life, so why is “breeding like rabbits” bad?
Maybe the rabbits are the wrong color? That must be it.
I thought jsut yesterday there was a headline “republican goes on wildly racist rant” but with different names. Hmmm. Hmmmmmmmm.
A black dog ? Wow.
Hey hey momma said the way you move, gonna make you shake, gonna make you groove.
Of course they believe in it. They are doing everything to keep the IQ low, or they would lose their voter base.
I'll bet she also believes in astrology science too!
I find it very curious that some of the worst examples of a human tend to be convinced that they are part of a group of better people.
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2024
244 points (96.6% liked)
politics
19072 readers
3637 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS