282
submitted 8 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 125 points 8 months ago

Biden is responsible for my loss of money because I chose to invest in a stock that was clearly a money grab.

—Republicans

[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 32 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

In a not-really-defense of their BS, by investing in DJT they've set up their net worth to get absolutely ruined during Biden's 2nd term.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 46 points 8 months ago

It would be ruined in Trump’s second term too. No one with real money bought that lie. He’s just making the middle class poor.

[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 30 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I'm trying to assume no 2nd Trump term for my mental health. Also I am, on the admitted basis of no special knowledge, worried that DJT stock is just a way for foreign money to get laundered and thus not subject to normal economics if he is reelected.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

You and me both. I can’t do it again. 😩

[-] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 4 points 8 months ago

He used the IPO to get some quick cash to pay the appeal bond on his NY lawsuit.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Except they're wasn't an IPO. They used a well-known shitty loophole to get by that.

[-] jkrtn@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

Every SPAC is a scam. I learned my lesson well before this trash, which is obviously a pump-and-dump scam even independently of involving a SPAC. I would rather burn my money than give it to Donald anyway.

[-] protist@mander.xyz 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Did he get quick cash? I read he's not allowed to liquidate any of his shares until 6 months have passed, which at this rate is not looking good for him

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 8 months ago

Biden is responsible for my loss of money

considers

I mean, strictly-speaking, the SEC is kind of responsible for protecting investors against scams.

I don't know whether Truth Social is actually breaking current SEC rules. But I also think that it's fair to say that avoiding copycats in the future might be a good idea.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

No more than three commissioners may belong to the same political party. And none of them are “controlled” by the president.

While the Democrats do have a 3 to 2 majority, I think it’s pretty safe to say that some of these people are corrupt as fuck.

Additionally, I don’t think either of these political parties are going to pass sweeping regulations that makes the rich honest. So while both political parties may be financially corrupt, there is really only one political party that wants the world to suffer, and that’s not the party that Joe Biden belongs to.

Edit: partY

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tal@lemmy.today 86 points 8 months ago

On Truth Social, retail investors are encouraging each other to keep the faith. “When the whole world is set on ruining you with everything that they have got, it’s a good sign that you are likely on the right side of things,” one person wrote on Thursday.

Well, that's certainly one investing strategy.

[-] BunnyKnuckles@startrek.website 38 points 8 months ago

That sounds like quote right off of /r/wallstreetbets

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] elgordio@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

Yeah this has been going on for a long old time on /r/dwac_stock. Lots of ‘diamond hands’ buy the dip’ etc… that said I expect a bunch of folk ended up making some decent cash when it went public, but anyone holding now is just asking to be a bagholder.

[-] kromem@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Maybe they can get together and pray in tongues like in Arizona. Seemed to work there.

Whats the GOP equivalent of Diamond Hands?

[-] ours@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

Bigly hands

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vegeta@lemmy.world 52 points 8 months ago
[-] GrymEdm@lemmy.world 47 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago

“Just sat down with my broker yesterday and am having him move $10,000 of my Roth IRA, that we had sitting idle for kind of like an extra ‘emergency fund’, into $DJT stocks!” one user declared excitedly. “This is the only time I would hope for the price to drop so I can get as many shares as possible!”

This is why we still need Social Security instead of just self directed retirement savings. Roth IRA savings are NOT where you source funds for buying meme stocks. With their mindset this person is going to end up penniless going into retirement, but luckily they'll have some money from Social Security. They will only have that Social Security money because there was no way for them to touch it.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Unless trump gets elected and actually does torch social security. It would cause untold suffering, but also a fair amount of schadenfreude.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 38 points 8 months ago

You'd think after a guy who has filed for bankruptcy at least six times, bankrupted a casino during the casino boom, never pays what he owes, people would have enough sense to NOT invest with that grifter.

[-] xkforce@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

His followers are exactly the sort of people that I would expect to fall for this.

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 9 points 8 months ago

It wasn’t an investment, at least not in the traditional sense. It was basically a bribe. If he manages to get elected again then they will come to him to to cash in on their ‘investments’.

[-] InternetUser2012@midwest.social 8 points 8 months ago

Like the coal baron Wilbur Ross? The guy that bailed tRump out when he bankrupted a casino during the casino boom? Then ends up being appointed to secretary of commerce?

[-] BorgDrone@lemmy.one 6 points 8 months ago

I’m sure that’s just a coincidence

/s

[-] EatATaco@lemm.ee 35 points 8 months ago

“Just sat down with my broker yesterday and am having him move $10,000 of my Roth IRA, that we had sitting idle for kind of like an extra ‘emergency fund’, into $DJT stocks!”

Three dumb things right here: having that much cash sitting idle in a Roth, paying a broker to purchase stock that you can do on your own for basically free, and putting that much money into such a terrible stock. This person is all kinds of moronic.

[-] ThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.works 10 points 8 months ago

Also YOLOing your emergency fund on something even dumber than a meme stock

[-] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Three dumb things right here: having that much cash sitting idle in a Roth, paying a broker to purchase stock that you can do on your own for basically free, and putting that much money into such a terrible stock. This person is all kinds of moronic.

I've had some comments earlier about how school curriculum in the US -- at least when I went through it -- didn't have any personal finance component.

I think that there might be a good argument for doing so.

I'm not saying that it has to cover every financial thing that a person might do, but setting them up from the beginning to have some kind of plan for what's sensible to do over the course of their life might be a good idea. It's something that everyone needs to deal with.

The extent of what my K-12 education did from a personal finance standpoint was teach us to write a check and balance a checkbook.

It's hard to cover everything for a lifetime -- policies and the environment and such do change -- but I do feel like it'd be possible to produce a considerably-better situation than the current one.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 8 months ago

On Truth Social, retail investors are encouraging each other to keep the faith. “When the whole world is set on ruining you with everything that they have got, it’s a good sign that you are likely on the right side of things,” one person wrote on Thursday.

Completely against rational thought. "If they tell me I'm bad, I must be good." Sounds just like his supporters.

Later:

Another chimed in: “Not going to be able to sleep tonight. If you stick it out I believe you will be rewarded greatly. I believe God directed me here.”

Completely delusional.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 8 months ago

When the whole world is set on ruining you with everything that they have got, it’s a good sign that you are likely on the right side of things,” one person wrote on Thursday.

Its no surprise they're paraphrasing the bible to try and make themselves feel better.

Delusional bunch of whackos and grifters...

[-] SPRUNT@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

The world was set on ruining Hitler. He must have been all the way on the right side of things.

/s

[-] grue@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago

LOL, get fucked, bagholders.

[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 31 points 8 months ago

Ways to increase Truth Social value

  1. Say Hunter Biden's information is hidden there.

  2. Sell nuclear secrets through Truth Social.

  3. Melania or Ivanka nudez.

  4. Share more Jeffrey Weinstein photos. Trump already has em.

  5. The Marjorie Taylor Greene vs Lauren boebert fight

  6. Have Putin show up to rally the GOP

  7. Matt Gaetz shares his pedo photos

[-] gramie@lemmy.ca 14 points 8 months ago

The Marjorie Taylor Greene vs Lauren Boebert fight

I'm thinking a steel cage match.

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 24 points 8 months ago

No one likes the stock.

[-] Hope@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

I didn't even know I was sick!

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Stay alive! We need you!

[-] bradorsomething@ttrpg.network 9 points 8 months ago

Short sellers are all over this. At least reddit has some intrinsic value at $10/share, but truth social is a dog worth 1/5 that.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

worth 1/5 that

I don't claim expertise here, nor have I been trying to read up on it, but I would be far less generous to Truth Social.

Part of the value is the userbase. That value probably grows more-than-linearly with the userbase size, given network effect; that'd favor larger networks.

https://www.searchlogistics.com/learn/statistics/truth-social-statistics/

Truth Social has about 2 million monthly active users.

https://backlinko.com/reddit-users

As of February 2024, Reddit has an estimated 1.2 billion monthly unique visitors.

Part of the value is the software. Reddit's codebase was written by and is owned by them. Truth Social is modified Mastodon, developed in a much shorter period of time.

You could maybe say that there's some value to lasting appeal. Reddit -- whatever current issues with monetization -- has proven itself over quite a period of time. Truth Social is very new. It's not at all clear how much of the appeal is Trump being on there, whether he will continue to be, or how much his appeal will be.

EDIT: Oh, maybe you meant the individual share price, rather than the market capitalization of the company as a whole. If I misunderstood you, disregard. I don't know what the situation is there (and I understand that there's some dilution issue and other things going on, so I'm not sure that I can just look at the outstanding shares count).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

My thoughts and prayers are with them. lol

[-] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago
[-] EnderMB@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Isn't this just a fancy way for Trump to get some liquid assets?

If so, of course they want you to keep the faith! More investment means Trump can pay his legal bills, liquidate, and let Musk get him back on Twitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2024
282 points (97.3% liked)

News

23627 readers
2454 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS