Sounds like extremely veiled speak for "we are going to test things out on random users to see how much bullshit they can accept"

It means they want to use telemetry to understand which features are used, to change how they deploy features. Since it's related to investment I wouldn't be surprised if it means more intrusive stuff like Pocket rather than their subtly irritating changes to bookmarks being worked out better.

I don't need feature developement streamlining based on user surveillance. I need options to disable features which are built based on a serious user feedback system if I don't need them.

Best thing about Floorp is how it lets you swap between layouts of the browser itself to me

They're going to be doing more A/B testing.

It's similar to AI regurgitated crap.

I mean it pretty clearly says that User insights will be put into development and user benefit is first.

...will that happen? Well. Probably not. But I hope so.

What a silly thing to stay.

Crafting a team mission statement was much less of an exercise in wordsmithing than I might have assumed. Instead, it was an exercise in aligning on the bigger questions of why we exist and who benefits from our work. I walked away with a better understanding of the value our team brings to Mozilla, a clearer way to articulate how our work ladders up to the organization’s mission, and a deeper appreciation for the individual perspectives of our team members.

This is exactly what "better leadership" looks like, and it's how Firefox will remain a compelling alternative to Chrome.

Much better than management blabla with really bad outcomes as is the norm, though 🤷

I stopped donating a long time ago, mozilla has proved time and time again to squander it. Firefox is on the brink of death despite having a large amount of funding available, and they keep focusing on other trash endeavors.

I'm pretty sure they are not making much in the way of money. That's part of the problem.