422
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] droopy4096@lemmy.ca 253 points 6 days ago

this is why democrats will keep on losing. Aggressive campaigning against progressives. That's how they tanked Berny who had a real shot at trump at the time. They have mothballed trump indictments when they've had a chance to impeach him, they have gagged them this campaign and result is for everyone to see... Pelosi is a very mean and very capable machine of destryction when it comes to progressives and their ideas

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 69 points 6 days ago

No fucking lie. Democrats scrap like alley cats while liberals clutch their pearls viewing GOP hypocrisy. They stick together, no matter what, and they win.

[-] Yawweee877h444@lemmy.world 218 points 6 days ago

Remember, Pelosi has a net worth over $200mil.

"It's a big club, and she's in it."

Pelosi fucking sucks. AOC for pres.

[-] Allonzee@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

https://apnews.com/article/business-nancy-pelosi-congress-8685e82eb6d6e5b42413417f3d5d6775

We have no left party in the United States, merely an economically right-wing party to the left of a fascist party, with a few left-wing spoilers like AOC and Sanders that they despise far more than their fascist opposition party, because while Democrats and Republicans rage over social policy, often the symptoms of economic desperation, they drink from the same Wall Street gravy train and take the same orders on economic policy.

A party actually attempting to reorient our economy based on the needs and priorities of the citizens of our society would be catastrophic to their legalized bribery, and insider info feeding arrangement.

If you think either party under it's current form will EVER lead to any form of universal healthcare, you're deluding yourself.

The UK has had universal healthcare since 1948. Canada since 1968-1970(provinces rollout)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theangryseal@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago

I hope that someday we live in a world where that can happen.

Maybe if she gets a few felonies.

[-] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 5 days ago

Hey, here's a thought. You know about the guy that shot a parasite in NY? AOC could try that too. She'd need enough vocal (and armed) popular support to avoid conviction (and retaliatory assassination) and it might turn into a civil war, but it might also work.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 57 points 5 days ago

Fuck Nancy Pelosoi and fuck corporate-owned democrats, and fuck the DNC.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

All comes down to $$$

AOC is fine when she's getting trotted out on Twitch-Plays-Pokemon to beg for dollars. But actually giving her power? Fuck that. No business interest would ever donate to the party again if they thought she was what they'd be buying into.

[-] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 26 points 5 days ago

You're... not making me say fuck the DNC any less with this comment, I hope you realize.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

No. But its worth understanding why AOC has survived in her seat longer than Cori Bush or Jamal Bowman did. She's been following the Sanders entryist playbook, thinking she can eventually get a seat at the table. But every two years, she gets played as a sucker - raising the party a ton of money, then getting stuffed back into the box when her usefulness has passed.

Bush and Bowman couldn't bring in that kind of coin, so they've been punted from the organization and replaced with more doctrinaire loyalists. AOC gets to hold her seat just so long as she finds enough people to keep bankrolling the consultant fees.

At some point, she needs to recognize she's being strung along or she just becomes another part of the problem.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 133 points 6 days ago

Burn the Democratic party to the ground. Their complicity has resulted in this state of affairs.

[-] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 49 points 6 days ago

none of the contemporary democrats have experience fighting fascists.

usually because they don't recognize their financial advisors as being fascists

[-] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

It's a sunk cost. All the time and effort we spent propping them up could be use to build a new but people won't face the fact. They think they can slowly steer it in the right direction but all the effort that has to go in is easily reversed by some insignificant amount of money from the doner class.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 117 points 6 days ago

"I'm probably going to die before my term is over, but I need to ratfuck the next generation of politicians so fascists get even more chance at fucking over more Americans."

Might as well just vote yes on everything Trump says, Pelosi.

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago
[-] thekerker@lemmy.world 43 points 5 days ago

Wow I can't seem to figure out why Democrats keep losing elections

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 125 points 6 days ago

Fuck everything about Pelosi and her bullshit insider trading.

She's not there to help Americans, she's there to maximize her and her husbands investments.

"Blue no matter who" winds up like ghouls like this running the party, because they'll never give up personal.power, and corrupt enough to sell out for campaign donations.

We have to have more standard than the letter by a name.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

I don’t know much about her, but what little I do know, she’s the Democrat’s version of McConnell.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago

Nope, McTurtle got rich along the way. But his lifelong goal has been packing the courts.

He is literally salivating like he just walked into a salad bar at the 42 vacancies Biden is about to hand over.

Pelosi doesn't give a shit about the Dem platform or helping people. She wants America to stay in the early 90s, that used to be enough to be considered somewhat progressive.

But the early 90s were 30 years ago. Imagine calling someone in the early 90s progressive because they wanted America to go back to pre civil rights movement.

That's the same time frame.

The right move was forming a serious left third party decades ago. We'd have a right, center, and left party and nothing would get done without some compromise between the wings, likely leading to a more fluid party structure.

We'd never see this shit where a handful of republican extremists sabotage everything no matter who has the majority.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] WatDabney@fedia.io 106 points 6 days ago

No surprise there.

Establishment Democrats would rather have power held by Republicans than by progressive Democrats.

[-] nothingcorporate@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago

And AOC has been kowtowing to Pelosi for the last few years in hopes of going along to get along. Hopefully this will wake up progressive Democrats to realize they will never be accepted by corporate Democrats, no matter how much they move to the right to appease them.

[-] Belgdore@lemm.ee 35 points 5 days ago

Pelosi is as bad as Mitch. These corporate backed dinosaurs have no business representing the people.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 66 points 6 days ago
load more comments (23 replies)
[-] Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago

Sounds like an endorsement then... enemy of my enemy and all.

Look, I found the problem with the DNC. Yes, it's rotten to the core and you will never change it.

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 19 points 5 days ago

Old fucks clinging on to power relentlessly

[-] zeroday@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 5 days ago

I'm glad she broke her hip. Genuinely, she deserves worse for constantly sabotaging any efforts to actually represent the working class in the Democratic Party.

[-] ATDA@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago

"We should do a post mortem but first, fuck you specifically AOC."

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Why the fuck won't that old bitch just get the fuck out? Her and Feinstein, two fucking peas in a pod. Dragging the entire democratic party down into the dumpster fire that it has become.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago

Because of course she is.

The "Lessor evil" party folks.

[-] AlternatePersonMan@lemmy.world 33 points 6 days ago

I mean... Yes. They are less evil. Way less evil. It's not even close.

Pelosi is a giant piece of shit, but she doesn't make the top 75% of conservatives.

Also AOC is a goddamn gem. Conservatives have previously zero of those.

Are Democrats anywhere near where I want to be? No. But I can't see how anyone could say they're the same.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago

There is a seemingly, almost intentional obtuseness to internal criticisms of the DNC from folks on the part of Democrats.

Fundamental to why the right has been able to organize a fascist takeover of this nation is actions like this from the Democratic party. Fascism in this country wouldn't be ascendant if the DNC didn't rat-fuck Bernie, twice. Health care CEO's wouldn't be getting gunned down in the street if the DNC forced M4A instead of the corporate sellout of Obamacare in 2016. Trump would not have won if Democrats had focused their efforts and spent their political capitol on issues that would make a fundamental difference in peoples lived experience in the period of 2021-2024. We wouldn't be in this position if Democrats didn't slow walk the prosecution of Donald Trump, effectively sitting on their hands until an election year to start taking action.

The state of this country is a direct consequence of the managerial class politics, which is all that the DNC has come to represent in a post 2024 world. They enable and empower the ratchet effect that allows the rightwing to become more and more fascist, because they are only ever willing to be a lessor evil.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Gerudo@lemm.ee 29 points 6 days ago

You know she's a great candidate for the people when her own party leaders don't want her in power.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 22 points 6 days ago

Funny that lemmy.world keeps whining about .ml types trying to get people not to vote when these fucking neoliberal ghouls are a better argument against it than anything they could ever say.

[-] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 6 days ago

I vote Democrat because the other option is a Fascist, Democrats do this shit like breathing and it only makes me hate filling the bubble of "Not the open fascist party" party.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

Oh, an old guy, super surprised. But yeah if you haven't seen the other committee seat fights; there is a real fight going on right now for the future of the Democratic Party. The committee seats are probably the most outward expression of it.

[-] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

[indecipherable] you Nancy!

[-] rebelsimile@sh.itjust.works 16 points 6 days ago

goddamn nancy it’s going so well so far, keep squeezing it’s almost dead.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2024
422 points (97.7% liked)

politics

19223 readers
2827 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS