301
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 212 points 1 year ago
[-] allywilson@sopuli.xyz 126 points 1 year ago

For a gender that less than 0.5% of the population identifies as (Wiki numbers, 355 people out of 100,000), we sure do argue about this a lot, don't we?

[-] WhaleScenery@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Never underestimate the will of bigots to obsess over other people’s genitalia.

Edit: I said the above to be facetious and poke fun at these wall-eyed transphobic lunatics. I realise that trans / NB issues encompass SO much more than that, and I was being deliberately reductive in order to make a point. I hope that comes through ❤️

[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 21 points 1 year ago

I hope that comes through ❤️

Clear as a bell. Anyone shitting on you is as tone-deaf as JK.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] K3zi4@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

It's just one of the culture war angles propagated by the rich to keep everyone angry with each other while they reap up as much of the world's wealth as possible before any of the forthcoming disasters- whether that is climate crisis migration, the next financial crisis, AI unemployment crisis, further war, food and water shortages worldwide, etc...

The writing is on the wall, a majority of people can see it too if you ask them, but unfortunately people can't help but get sucked in anyway. Probably because it's a distraction from facing the uncertain future we all have.

OR, this is just a tinfoil hat getting the better of me. It feels like a logical conclusion, so maybe that's the fallacy I've fallen for.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Better that than throwing off the shackles of the oppressor and rising up against the oligarch class.

Those brown lads area after your crumbs! That man wants to be called "they"! Ooh look, Israel/Gaza, pick a side! Look at this jobless woman with her fancy flat screen television! Does eating Wotsits cure cancer? Distract yourselves with yourselves.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 year ago

Even if they were only 1 in a billion. They still deserve to exist and live their lives how they like if it doesn't negatively affect others.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] hperrin@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago

Fuck JK Rowling. What a bigot.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago

Always has been...

It's just the kids reading her books 20 years ago didn't recognize all the problematic shit she wrote till they grew up.

[-] Redhotkurt@kbin.social 61 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It’s just the kids reading her books 20 years ago didn’t recognize all the problematic shit she wrote till they grew up.

Adult here who was an adult when the books came out and recognized all the awful racist and sexist imagery. I have nothing new to add to the conversation, I'm just gonna vent. There were quite a few of us here and there who spoke up when the books were published, but we were significantly outnumbered and immediately drowned out by the "shut up and stop complaining" crowd. Yes, all this talk of "problematic" issues in the Potter books are old observations we've been rehashing for two decades...the goblins who run the banks are a horrifyingly obvious Jewish caricature, Chinese character Cho Chang's first name is actually a Korean last name, the one black guy in the whole fuckin series is named "Shacklebolt" (seriously wtf), the one Irish character goes by "Seamus Finnegan," the main female character Hermione is constantly referred to as "bossy"...just to name a few. JFC, what a shitshow.

Ok, one more example that got a lot of attention years back but sort of faded away from public consciousness: in the first movie there's a bigass six-pointed star on the fuckin floor of Gringotts, of all places. You know, Gringotts. The bank......where the undeniably Jew-like goblins work. No fuckin shit, it's right there, plain as day. That one still boggles my mind. I mean, what the fuck, man. https://i.postimg.cc/Jzx2hr31/happry-potter-1-star-of-david-gringotts.png

EDIT: Hey everyone, it's been abuot an hour now and I just want to apologize for all this negativity. I've given this a lot of thought, and I've come to realize all the anti-this and anti-that complaints are really unfair and show only one side of JK Rowling. So I feel compelled to balance this out and remind everyone that she is also pro-slavery. Especially the kind of slavery that forces its slaves to work completely naked, and no one in the book has a problem with it except for the bossy lib girl that everyone hates.

[-] CosmicApe@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

Me as a 13yo reading the first book: Holy shit, Dumbledore is so badass he just magics up a feast for everyone!
Me reading the later books: Oh, the feast is cooked by elves. Slave elves. Elves that are slaves... Cool cool cool...

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Holy. Shit. That Star of David is blowing my mind.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Harry Potter reached the height of its popularity in the 2000s/early 2010s, in a time when gay was still an extremely popular insult, feminists were the punching bags of the internet, holocaust jokes were a dime a dozen and anyone saying it wasn't funny was an enemy to comedy itself, the biggest internet creators took literal pride in their content specifically being offensive (Smosh was the biggest example of this IMO), and saying you should respect people's gender identities on the mainstream internet will get you labeled as an SJW and actual death threats thrown your way, so I'd also argue that Harry Potter not being seen as problematic was in part because mainstream society (not you obviously, but the broader internet/pop culture in general at the time) genuinely did not view those things as problematic. Like if JK Rowling said all the things she said about transgender rights in 2003, she would probably still end up in controversy but way more people would actually support her, would have probably split the fandom roughly down the middle as opposed to the overwhelmingly negative response she's receiving in the 2020s. Or look at it this way: Harry Potter was most popular in the same time period when Family Guy was most popular.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

It’s just the kids reading ~~her~~ its books 20 years ago didn’t recognize all the problematic shit ~~she~~ it wrote till they grew up.

Surely it can't have a problem with that wording, which doesn't refer to gender at all.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 59 points 1 year ago

Has anyone in any country ever been incarcerated for misgendering a trans person? Is there even a significant number of people who seriously believe that would be an appropriate response?

Nope.

Just come out and tell us about your victimhood complex, Joanne.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemm.ee 44 points 1 year ago

Using the correct pronouns is an issue of respecting others, and seeing Rowling doubling down on her smug and bigoted views in public is a revelation, because during a re-read, you start seeing these views reflecting everywhere in her writing. It's a deeply prejudiced and irrational world, and it stayed that way all the way to the ending with nothing in that world really changed.

I think being an adult is realizing that I don't love Harry Potter as much as I used to, because (I can't believe I'm saying this) I've finally outgrown it. It's time to move on.

Being a grown-up is painful.

[-] nickwitha_k@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 year ago

A big part of that is context, I think. When we were children, we didn't have the knowledge or developed brains to recognize these things. And the lossy nature of our memory leads us to skew towards remembering things in more idealized manners, probably because it is easier to recall things as "concentrates" of reality. The parts that we, as adults, recognize as problematic don't tend to be remembered as significant because, when making the initial memories as children, we lacked the context to flag them as such.

I think being an adult is realizing that I don't love Harry Potter as much as I used to, because (I can't believe I'm saying this) I've finally outgrown it. It's time to move on.

On other hand, this realization frees you in a way and may potentially inspire you seek out or create another piece of art to love (and potentially share with others). While I disagree with a significant section of the population and believe that art is inseparably and indelibly linked to the artist, it is important still to be kind to our past selves and not judge them for what they didn't know. That still doesn't entirely soften the blow of "breaking up" with a piece of art that one has loved but, it can help with accepting it.

Being a grown-up is painful.

It's also joyful, terrible, wonderful, enraging, sorrowful, and countless other feelings and possibilities. I think it's beautiful, even if not always comfortable. And the uncomfortable bits provide contrast to the positive, letting them seem to shine a bit more brilliantly. Though, that could also be the near-pathological optimism that I adopted to cope with depression in my younger years.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] blue_zephyr@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

The prosecution complex is real. No one's suing you for using the wrong pronouns you bigot.

In fact, I'm almost entirely sure that no one's ever asked Rowling to use specific pronouns because no queer person could stand being around her for longer than a minute.

[-] Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

*Persecution

Prosecution is a noun referring to the party bringing charges in a criminal case.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tony@lemmy.hoyle.me.uk 39 points 1 year ago

Does she realize what a complete arsehole that makes her look? She'd rather go to jail than treat people like human beings?

[-] Chais@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago
[-] vanquesse@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

assuming you didn't make a typo, this ain't cute. The signal you're sending is that respecting pronouns is a privilege you reserve for people you agree with.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] noodle@feddit.uk 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

[x] Doubt

Even if you disagree, using a pronoun is just polite. She'd have to go out of her way to do this.

[-] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He'd have to go out of his way to do this.

Start misgendering him and see how frustrated he gets.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] JackLSauce@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

He really does know how to keep yall pushing their SEO score higher

[-] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Some people are just ugly on the inside, deep down where it counts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago

Wait... is that really on the table? If so, then I grudgingly have to take her side insofar as objecting to prior restraint or compelled speech. Being an asshole is a fundamental human right.

[-] darq@kbin.social 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No. It isn't on the table. This is another in the long line of scenarios that only exist in TERF imaginations.

[-] finthechat@kbin.social 46 points 1 year ago

It was not on the table.

Some rando posted on her Shitter account "vote for Labour, get two years" and Rowling responded with the quote in the headline.

If you read the article, they clarify that the Labour party wants to crack down on LGBTQ hate crimes, and nowhere is it said that they would make it illegal to use improper pronouns for others.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] rainynight65@feddit.de 12 points 1 year ago

That makes her the second gigantic prominent shithead in as many days expressing that they're willing to go to prison for their beliefs. And also the second whom I wouldn't believe for even a millisecond that they're telling the truth.

[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Enjoy jail then I guess. It's a pretty stupid hill to die on, especially when you're filthy rich and the conservatives already hate you over the whole witchcraft nonsense. I cannot fathom conservative doublethink.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rayquetzalcoatl@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago

what a weirdo lol

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The twitter thread where they fantasise about being in prison reminds me of this meme:

1000011280

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What a shitbrick. I am glad I never got into her books in the first place. I saw the first movie and had no interest in seeing the others. I read half the first book to my daughter and she got bored with it, so we stopped. My wife got really into her and is disappointed neither of us are, but fuck her. I don't want to spend a dime on her.

Edit: Weird part- she's always been an atheist and she loved the Narnia books.

[-] qyron@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago

What is stopping an atheist of enjoying the Narnia Chronicles?

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2023
301 points (86.4% liked)

United Kingdom

4060 readers
108 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS