this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
281 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

69658 readers
2700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sunsofold 3 points 9 hours ago

Great, just in time for the number of shipments of imports needing to be distributed across the US to plummet...

[–] rekabis@programming.dev 1 points 7 hours ago

Not after the first snowfall, they won’t.

[–] The_Caretaker@lemm.ee 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)
[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 158 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Americans will do anything to avoid just using trains.

[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 25 points 23 hours ago

Trains help poor people too. We like to pretend we don’t have poor people. Makes them easier to ignore while pretending to be Christian.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Except that nearly all US rail is for freight. We hate PASSENGER trains. We freaking love freight rail.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Except that's rail only carries 16% of freight by weight and 2% of freight by value.

Pretty sure USA hates freight rail too.

https://www.energy.gov/eere/vehicles/fact-846-november-10-2014-trucks-move-70-all-freight-weight-and-74-freight-value

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 6 points 22 hours ago

You're looking at a different issue. I'm referring to passenger trains vs freight trains and you're talking about freight trains vs semi trucks. I'm saying that the rail we do have, we overwhelmingly use for freight. It's the primary reason we still have trains today in the US.

In regards to percentage of freight shipped by rail vs other means, I believe you that semis take a ton of that.

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But american freight trains are laughably bad too

https://youtu.be/AJ2keSJzYyY

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Yes, but "we will avoid trains no matter what" is blatantly false. It's terrible, but it is our main method of shipping freight from ports to inland cities.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 68 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

While I don't necessarily disagree with you, trains are used here all the time specifically for long haul stuff.

[–] Fondots@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I used to be the shipping/receiving guy in a warehouse, it fell to me to arrange all of our freight pickups, which was annoying because I didn't really have direct access to any information about pricing, deadlines, etc. so I was constantly going back to the office to show someone quotes to see whether the rates and transit times were acceptable.

Most of our freight was LTL stuff (less than truckload, a couple pallets, not enough to fill a truck by itself) but a few times every month or two we'd get full truckload sized orders.

When it came to them, often "intermodal" shipping had much better rates. Intermodal meaning at least 2 different forms of transportation were going to be used. Truck, train, boat, cargo plane, etc.

As a US-based company with mostly US-based customers, that usually meant rail for us.

However, almost none of our shipments went intermodal because it was too slow for our customers.

It wasn't usually a drastic difference, we're talking maybe 1-3 extra days in most cases. Over the Road (OTR) there weren't many places in the US that we couldn't get freight to from our location in 5 days or less, and those 5 day locations were mostly real middle-of-nowhere customers on the other side of the country.

It always blew my mind that we didn't or couldn't push our customers to just place orders 2 or 3 days earlier to save some pretty significant money on shipping.

I don't claim to know much about the industry, i was just some kid who needed a job and ended up the shipping guy because I knew how to use a computer and spoke English. But we a textile company that made things like work clothes (chef coats, scrubs, industrial work wear, etc) and restaurant table linens, and we sold mostly to bigger wholesalers, business service companies, etc. who would resell it or provide it to their customers as part some sort of contracted laundry service or something, so not really something I'd think of as being particularly time-sensitive or wildly unpredictable that they couldn't anticipate their bigger orders a couple days ahead of time

Guess it probably says something about how much we all love instant gratification.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Inventory became evil decades ago. “Just In Time” logistics became the norm instead of having warehoused inventory on hand. The beancounters all decided inventory was money that was sitting around not doing anything and maintaining the warehouse space cost more too. Can’t have those costs on the balance sheet. So speed in receiving smaller shipments more often is now the norm, along with ordering when you need them instead of ordering ahead of time, because some beancounter isn’t gonna be happy about extra inventory.

[–] glitchdx@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

as these tariffs start kicking in, companies are really going to regret not having local inventory.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 3 points 14 hours ago

Worked in two factories since Covid. The first stockpiled components we produced in house, and relied in JIT logistics for external components. Which was basically the stupidest arrangement they could have cone up with. They had 10+ years worth of parts they could make in house, clogging up their warehouse. And couldn't ship anything because they were waiting on suppliers.

The other built two new warehouses to stockpile external supplies, and never let up on production.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 101 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Why not make automated trains with their own dedicated right of way?

[–] Rambomst@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But that would require investment in infrastructure...

[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Bet that semi trucks are more expensive due to road damage and congestion alone.

[–] mriguy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, but that’s all subsidized by taxpayers, so it’s more expensive overall but cheaper for YOU.

[–] twopi@lemmy.ca 4 points 21 hours ago

Privatize gains, socialize losses. The Capitalist^TM^ way!

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Efficiency, pollution too (even when electric, because tires and break dust are a thing)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As of Thursday, the company’s self-driving tech has completed over 1,200 miles without a human in the truck.

That's not an impressive number. That's like 2 days' worth of driving.

[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 25 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Yeah that's about 2 and a half round-trips between Dallas and Houston, that's...not a lot to be calling this thing ready to go and pulling out the safety drivers.

I wonder how these handle accidents, traffic stops, bad lane markings from road construction, mechanical failure, bad weather (heavy rain making it difficult/impossible to see lane markings), etc.

You'd think they would be keeping the safety drivers in place for at least 6+ months of regular long-haul drives and upwards of 100k miles to cover all bases.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago

The one article I heard on TechLinked talked about them using lidarr.
So better in every way than a tesla.
Assuming they are top mounted, they have a better scanning coverage than a regular car.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 day ago

It would be more interesting to know how many miles they completed with the safety driver in the vehicle.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago

Fuck cars. Fuck massive death trucks even more.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 54 points 1 day ago (10 children)

Great... I can't wait to be hit by one of those on my motorcycle

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'd actually bet they're safer than some tweaked out dude on his 20th hour at the wheel.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What an incredibly infuriating waste of effort that would be so much better spent on trains, driverless or otherwise.

[–] Redex68@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree. There are many situations where a truck is better suited for transport than a train. The US already has a pretty large freight train network. I agree that there definitely should be more investment in rail as well, but there's no reason for both not to exist at the same time.

[–] Hawke@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

There are, but “long haul routes” are definitely better for a train.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›