this post was submitted on 09 May 2025
57 points (88.0% liked)

Asklemmy

47959 readers
353 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

My IQ was tested several times back in school and I usually clocked in at 148 or 149. That said I don't think IQ tests are very useful. They also test for very spefic types of thinking. Those traits that people considered smart have. It's kind of circular.

I think it's like a physical fitness test that just measures bicep thickness. It tells you something but not as much as it claims.

I'm very good a understanding systems and understanding how changes effect them. I also pick up concepts very easy but struggle with remembering the details.

Presumably that's because I learned it quickly and didn't have the repetition to cement the details. Because I know the concept I'm board trying to memorize the details.

I know what J K reproduction types are but don't remember which is which. Same with baryonic particles I can't remember if they are half integer spin or not and or if they obey the Pauli exclusion principle. But I understand what those concepts are.

I'm ok with people and general social interaction but I don't read people well and stick to the social rules for a situation. I've totally misread interactions more than most people but usually keep it civil.

I do a lot of cooking and am very good at getting the effect I want. I know what protiens and starches do at various temps and how to calculate the right amounts of salt, acid, and sugar. I'm not good at winging it or being creative with flavors.

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

I'll give you an high IQ answer even though I'm dumb as a f*ck

All answers here are just inner ramblings of average people with average IQ.

And if you ever want to find a true smart person just lookup Dunning Kruger effect.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Imagine being smarter than everyone around you, constantly speaking like you are explaining to a child. You can never truly be angry at people because how could they know any better?

That is how people who think they have a high IQ think, those who actually have it are probably mostly successful academics who are actually pushing humanity forward and are probably not assholes about it because for someone to truly and deeply understand a complex subject they must not only be smart, but also dedicate significant time and effort into learning.

I always found Tony Stark to be a funny character. He is basically the embodiment of what stupid people who they are smart want to be. Like that scene where he figures out time travel in a single night because he is so smart, but of course even an infinitely intelligent being would still need a few weeks of reading just to catch of on the knowledge needed to even understand quantum mechanics properly.

[–] GiantChickDicks@lemmy.ml 9 points 13 hours ago

Lonely isn't the right word, because I'm not upset about not having a large group of people I consider myself close to. It's somewhat disappointing that I can't deeply relate to more people, though. I'd like to meet more likeminded folks, but I'm also less and less willing to tolerate draining relationships as I get older. Being particular about where you invest your time and energy tends to be socially limiting.

[–] KrasMazov@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Skimming through this post, people actually believe in IQ?

IQ is not a good measurement of intelligence. It is at best one single measurement of pattern recognition, and it is not set in stone either, as you can get better or worse at it.

There's multiple types of intelligence it doesn't measure and honestly, I don't believe anyone should take it serious.

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago

I feel like this is the best take. IQ is an antiquated and outmoded way of measuring specific standards like spatial aptitude and logic. They're definitely things that can indicate a "smart person" but are only two out of dozens of aspects that make up human intelligence.

[–] w3dd1e@lemm.ee 12 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

What is considered high? I have an above average intelligence, but I also have ADHD.

I have a fantastic memory, but I can’t always choose what I remember. I’m great at facts and trivia but I can’t remember things that are actually important in my life.

I didn’t have to study in school. I could glance over the material minutes before a test and pass without trying. Then, I got to college and I didn’t know how to study as I’d never done that before. I failed out.

[–] Hugin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

So 100 is an average IQ. They will actually change the scoring to keep it that way. 115 puts you 1 standard deviation ahead. 125 or higher puts you in the top 5%.

I was similar in high school and college. I wasn't good at studying and hadn't needed to in high school. I had a rough first two semesters in college going on academic probation.

I was able to adjust in time and put the work in to pass but it could have gone either way. I tended do the best in my hard class because I put the most effort in those at the expense of my easy A classes hurting my GPA.

[–] Ragnor@feddit.dk 3 points 11 hours ago

Same here.

I learned to read at 3, and taught myself English before starting in school by reading all the text I came across on my Amiga, recognizing words that were similar to the Danish ones and slowly picking up more and more.

I also got a My Little Professor at 3, a reverse calculator that gave problems to solve. My mom taught me addition, subtraction and multiplication, and my mothers "subtraction is the opposite of addition" was enough for me to figure division out. I did the hardest problems in all four categories in my head, with numbers with up to 4 digits, before starting in school too.

I never did homework in school, only things that had to be turned in. I always had my hand up in class, because my innate curiosity and mental capacity meant that I could figure things out as the questions were written on the blackboard. The lax attitude stuck.

My biggest problem growing up was bullying. I didn't share interests with hardly any of my classmates, since I was at least 3 years ahead of them in my mental development. My best friend was 10 years old when I was 7, and he and I played Magic together because his classmates couldn't figure it out. My glasses, small stature, and the fact that I changed schools twice didn't help.

[–] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml -2 points 9 hours ago

People with High IQ are dumb.

They lack intelligence in everything except what they love and are narzisstic about.

People with high IQ and high EQ and many others might be awesome, as you can pull out lots of social patterns, wisdoms, etc. But only for those who had good experiences in Life and are a bit older.

What am I? Idk. I think I have a high IQ because of various diagnoses, but lots of mental issues are blocking any motivation to understand Math as fast like other People in University. There are incredible fast learners, but I see in them no experience or memory of pain, suffering, etc. Like, its the "fun" that steers us to learn. Becoming distracted pretty fast like me is pain. Its like I have only a High IQ when the Moon shines perfectly.

I believe that I have a good amount of EQ, because I too often only think about lives of other people and even wasted money to help a broken new friend, just to see the money never again and him either. I suffer just from the imagination of a friend who suffered. I could be the smartest person by being the dumbest Person. Meaning that when I would only see the world centered around me like an egoist/narzissist, I would be happy, because I would lack the intelligence to simulate another World of another Person. I would only know what I need like a dumb Person. I would lack a lot of intelligences.

Having an High IQ without anything else, makes you a very dumb Person is my Opinion. I feel like the word "IQ" is wrongly labeled, because you dont really measure "Intelligence" by it.

[–] rockstarmode@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's a mixed bag.

Growing up was made difficult because school is so slow that I'd rather be getting into trouble than sitting in class. By the start of middle school I'd already read the entire high school honors reading list, I had to walk to the high school from my middle school in 7th grade to take math classes. I rarely had regular school work in high school, nearly all of my academic teachers designed a different curriculum for me, which was nice but probably mostly to keep me from acting up in class. I never studied or did a shred of homework, but got good grades.

Social interactions were tough, I'm not much of an empath, not that I don't experience empathy but emotions just aren't intuitive, actually they often are the opposite of what you'd expect to be helpful, especially among young people. I had to concentrate to read people's faces and mannerisms to understand the emotional and social subtexts of most interactions. I self medicated with alcohol a lot in high school.

All of my academic classes in high school were honors, and my final 2 years were all AP, while lettering in 3 varsity sports (4 total, but you can only play 3 each academic year). It wasn't until my second year in uni that I ran into a class for which I actually had to study (nuclear chemistry), and boy was that an awful surprise. A handful of classes were like this for me, most I just showed up 3 times and got a good grade: the first day of class so I wouldn't get dropped, the midterm, and the final.

I read quickly, think systematically, and information just sticks in my head. It was very difficult to understand why this wasn't how most people were. Everything I do I analyze for improvement, and remember to do it better the next time. My wife calls me a skill collector because people seem to think I'm super good at everything, but to me it's just logical that if you're going to take time do something you might as well do it as well as possible.

After uni things started getting easier. Being forced to closely analyze social interactions and systematically give the "right" reactions is extremely useful in professional life. I wear this mask in all my interactions with all but my closest friends. It's a bit psychopathic, but I don't do it to anyone's detriment, it's mostly to get along and fit in.

I've self selected for highly intelligent friends, and I'm exhilarated to meet new people who can communicate with the kind of bandwidth that our brains run at, if that makes sense. I'm still close with most of my friends from high school, who have had varying levels of success, but I still have to be guarded when it comes to activities or conversation to make sure I don't stick out too much.

In general I have a very pessimistic view of people and the world. The average person isn't very sharp, and half of all people are dumber than that. However many smart people do evil things, most of the time for no reason at all. It's exhausting to keep up with it all, so I just focus on my path and my family, and do what I can to directly improve my community.

It would be nice to fit in a little easier, but I wouldn't trade my experience for anything else.

[–] oyzmo@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

This is relatable.

[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

The section about pessimism is relatable. I spent a few months in my teen years in a chatroom with the topic of being outcasts in some way or another, before realizing it was a self-prophecising kind of toxic the same way that incel culture is, but there were some people ranting about how stupid people are and woe is me, I'm Cassandra! And my impression at the time was thinking they're probably an egotistical prick who thinks they're better than everyone else. But on the other hand, it is frustrating to see, less how 'dumb' people are but how ignorant people are. It's hard not to get a bit of ego at times. And this isn't about IQ for the most part, these issues are often caused or compounded by other problems with education, social values, propaganda/indoctrination and the lot. I guess I feel the activist frustrated enough to yell "why don't you care?" when obviously, rationally it's more complex than that.

This is a big issue in tech communities as it becomes more accessible, people are entering who aren't used to the DIY culture, who don't understand unsaid (or said) rules like asking smart questions to not waste everyone's time. The world is at your fingertips! Fucking put that question in a search engine first before you waste my time, my life has value goddammit! When I occasionally whine about reddit culture, that's a part of it. People who are curious (and that's perfect!) but don't realize they're asking questions they can learn the answer to themselves. It's like if we're talking about cooking and someone jumps in to ask "what is a herb?", it's a valid question, an important question, but for fucks sake you can learn that without asking us all! Or at least go to ELI5 & NoStupidQuestions where those questions are appropriate.

Keep in mind, that rant is specific to online questions, where you have the resources you need. It's more acceptable in a conversation, and I certainly don't want anyone to feel uncomfortable learning things.

Honestly, a community learning how to effectively direct people to an FAQ to onboard uninformed newcomers on answers and community expectations is the difference between a welcoming community and burned-out babysitters becoming toxic.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 2 points 17 hours ago

I'm struggling to take a lot of these answers seriously. You really think that way about yourself?

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 5 points 22 hours ago

Being told all through school that I'm not 'working up to my potential'. Frustration at dumb jobs.

[–] butsbutts@lemmy.ml 3 points 20 hours ago
[–] isyasad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's tough having a high IQ. Most people don't understand the world and the flaws of humans, at least at the level I do. As such, I find it hard to connect to other people. Most people are morons. I feel deep sorrow in knowing the direction the world is going and that the inhabitants of the world are mostly idiots.

...

Why do so many people (in this thread) unironically feel this way? "Intelligence" is a socially constructed and often useless idea that includes and excludes many things seemingly at random. For example, chess is often thought of as something that's very intelligent, but skill at chess is (just like nearly anything else) based on practice & experience. Just because you're good at chess and did well in school doesn't mean that you alone can understand the problems in the world at a deeper level than an average Jo.

Everyone should read "What Is Intelligence, Anyway?", a short excerpt from Isaac Asimov.

I'll paste the part I think is most important, but the whole thing is worth reading:

Well, then, suppose my auto-repair man devised questions for an intelligence test. Or suppose a carpenter did, or a farmer, or, indeed, almost anyone but an academician. By every one of those tests, I'd prove myself a moron, and I'd be a moron, too. In a world where I could not use my academic training and my verbal talents but had to do something intricate or hard, working with my hands, I would do poorly. My intelligence, then, is not absolute but is a function of the society I live in and of the fact that a small subsection of that society has managed to foist itself on the rest as an arbiter of such matters.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 2 points 17 hours ago

Related to tests and skills, What if we just didn't mark students?, a short talk from a university course runner and educator in general.

It makes some points that are already familiar or easy to notice, but it's also an interesting exploration of academia, tests and skills. I know some students who learn under that lecturer and what they're taling about clearly comes through in the course structure. One notable part is that one tutorial class is responsible for making notes for each week of lectures, and the whole cohort is allowed to bring those collaborative notes into the exam, like a semi-open book test. I heard they just decided one class to have a lesson on rhetoric instead of cybersecurity because it's a pretty nerdy industry and one involving invisible risks, and there's no point being an expert if you can't convince your boss to let you fix the problems.

[–] SplashJackson@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

You don't feel smart, but everyone else appears extremely dumb

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 17 hours ago

I don't know.

[–] Corno@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I had my IQ tested when I was 12 and it was high, but alas, not high enough to understand Rick and Morty

Jokes aside, I've been told that I catch onto things quicker and I'm good at solving things in creative ways!

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 1 points 20 hours ago
[–] twice_hatch@midwest.social 1 points 20 hours ago

Instead of being bad at everything I'm good at a few things

[–] DancingBear@midwest.social 10 points 1 day ago

The details of my life are quite inconsequential, but since you asked…

Very well, where do I begin? My father was a relentlessly self-improving boulangerie owner from Belgium with low grade narcolepsy and a penchant for buggery. My mother was a fifteen year old French prostitute named Chloe with webbed feet. My father would womanize, he would drink, he would make outrageous claims like he invented the question mark. Some times he would accuse chestnuts of being lazy, the sort of general malaise that only the genius possess and the insane lament. My childhood was typical, summers in Rangoon, luge lessons. In the spring we'd make meat helmets. When I was insolent I was placed in a burlap bag and beaten with reeds, pretty standard really. At the age of 12 I received my first scribe. At the age of fourteen, a Zoroastrian named Vilma ritualistically shaved my testicles. There really is nothing like a shorn scrotum, it's breathtaking, I suggest you try it.

[–] Lemming6969@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Very depressing. We're social animals, and being highly literate and informed while also socially apt, you really realize just how far apart you are from others, which is alienating, frustrating, and tiresome.

You wouldn't understand

Jk, I'm dum af

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It's very tiring having to start off every conversation by letting people know that I'm more intelligent than them, but it is necessary.

[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I just laminated a bunch of cards that say Wile E. Coyote; Super Genius and hand them out. Saves time.

E: ducking autocorrupt

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Thanks for asking this question. I have enjoyed reading the answers people gave you.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Frustrating.

The rate at which I absorb information is disgusting. Yes please finish your sentence I already have a response why are you taking so long. How did I learn that? I picked up the manual and did it. Developing new skills? Learning Rust right now and its going well, failed out of highschool because I learned too easily and didn't need the homework to learn (so it didn't get done).

It comes with imposter syndrome: I knew the problem, I had the pattern figured out, why did I still fuck everything up (plot twist I probably didn't).

It comes with a superiority complex: I learned this in 10 minutes from looking at a Sci Journal, why has it been hours and yallvstill don't get it? πŸ™„

It comes with accidentally hurting people: frequently I say things thinking something hould be obvious when it is not, while unintended, it often hurts my partner who is usually in the line of fire when I let some dumb shit outta my mouth and insult someone's intelligence.

Anyway I hate it I'd rather be dumbsauce ignorance is bliss

[–] absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 day ago

You wouldn't.

I've considered what it would be like to be more "normal".

Even with all the issues that come with the extra abilities. They are the good kind of problems.

If you want to put a dent in your superiority complex. Go spend a day in a mechanical workshop, try to something that can only be learned by feel and sound....

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'm 128, it's up to you to decide whether it's high enough or not.

Generally, I am successful in my studies and pursue career in science. I am not a high earner, and doing mental work still drains me heavily. I take a few hours of dumb physical work every week to reset. I am more or less satisfied with my life, I do have a romantic partner and generally find it easy to navigate social situations, but I'm introverted and need to recharge. So, you can say I have a high burst productivity all-round, but I'm not good at a long game.

This is just me though, and one thing to remember is that there is no objective metric for intelligence, and it can be divided in many different ways. Some people are great at solving math problems, but are dead stupid in social situations. Some go vice versa. Some have a gift for certain areas of knowledge or skills where they are way above average, while having underwhelming performance with the rest.

For example, I excel at disciplines that require me to connect many diverse data points (my area of interest is microbiology), but I'm not that good at following logic through many layers of calculations and linking it back to source (as in physics/math; I'm still able to carry out calculations I need for my work, but it's exhausting). I acquire language skills quite readily, and have good auditory perception overall, but have high reaction time and struggle driving or doing competitive sports/gaming (no, higher intelligence doesn't mean faster reaction).

Overall, I'm just a normal human, fairly smart, fairly capable, but nothing supernatural and sometimes straight up underwhelming.

[–] Nexy@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

Probably the thing it's get a little mad because you need to explain multiple times things you think are really easy or stop hearing some people when start explaining things because you know you can catch what they are saying anytime. It's really shitty, I dont whant to be this way. Also people treat you different because "you can so it better", no I can't.

[–] rawn@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

It vastly depends on everything else.

You can be a dude with a normal life, who just makes conclusions faster and you've learned that everyone likes how smart you are and you enjoy this.

You can be a restless mess, because you've known all your life that there's nothing to compete with and it's difficult enough to find someone to even have a somewhat decent conversation on your level with. These people come with or without the arrogance you're thinking of right now. Some are just genuinely kind and thoughtful, but always a step ahead without even really appreciating their ability much.

You can be an absolute underachiever, because being smart was never rewarded in your life. Maybe you even learned that "You're not special" so much so, that you punished others for not being able to draw the same conclusions as you in the same time, because you always thought they were just being lazy on purpose.

You can be entirely unaware and may say funny things like "I don't think we're all that many really smart people in $techplacewithclearlysmartpeople. I talked to most of them and I don't struggle at all".

Source: High IQ myself, working with other people who increasingly talk to me openly about this and their overall situation. So much of who we become is about what our parents do to us and if there's understanding and love and support on that end.

Obviously there's the whole spectrum thing as well. I don't think a higher IQ means "more autism", as someone suggested. I think it increases your chances of struggling with a regular (neurotypical) kind of life, for example because you are supposed to be interested in 1 subject (to make a career), but - similar to people with ADHD - may care for all the subjects.
If you think about what is neurotypical though, you can classify people with a particularly high IQ or people with particularly high sensitivity as neurodiverse in just the same way you do that for people with Autism or ADHD. Now if you think about humanity as a whole, we may all to some degree be diverging from the norm in any or all of these ways, but still be more or less free of struggle, because it's not by much, while for the more extreme cases, they stand out for better or worse.

[–] BlackRing@midwest.social 46 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I have a high IQ as well as ADHD and Autism.

Out of context, scoring as high as I did really meant next to nothing. In the context of the diagnoses I received later in life, definitely made sense, and helped color a picture painted in two solid days with a psychologist.

Somehow, I think it's important that the IQ test I took was not called an IQ test to me until after. Like, I knew I was in for tests, but more broadly told what things were about.

As a student, I had a science teacher who had been teaching many years, tell my mother he had never seen a student think in the manner I did. I was doing exceptionally well in class, but did not exceed in the fashion that would get me into an ivy league school, which at the time was supposed to be a goal. My father graduated MIT.

There are times when it's great. When I can focus on something, I can learn a lot and get very good at it. However, I spent decades with two obstacles I could never get myself past: the inability to keep that focus or control it, and the inability to even understand other people enough to try to get along with them long-term.

The result is I am just now, at 41, starting to figure out what I want to do with my life after way too long in a profession I should never have entered, and burned out of twice. And by burn out I do not mean tired and sad, I mean hospitalization.

In summary, it can be pretty great, but in my case it's fraught with difficulty as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGuyTM3@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago

It’s being like you

[–] rudyharrelson@lemmy.radio 29 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Episodes of Rick and Morty really hit close to home in a way that normies couldn't possibly fathom. It's a blessing and a curse.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Depends on what you mean by "high." I have scored between 130-140 on IQ tests I've taken of various quality, which is considered high by most. Idk how it would be different from anyone else's experience of the world. I did extremely well in school and I work as a chemical engineer with a focus on machine learning implementations and capital expansion. I don't know if I would consider myself "smarter" than the average person, just better at certain types of tasks. I also grew up in a stable two parent upper middle class household that valued education and academic success, which is a huge leg up that can't be ignored.

[–] borokov@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I have a high IQ and diagnosed as "gifted" by psy at nearly 40.

I won't argue about IQ and Giftedness having scientific base or not. All I can do is a professional clinical psy told me I am gifted. And what I'll say is just my way of thinking.

I have a systemic brain. I have very poor memory concerning names, date, etc... but I can remember complex system (basically, what cause create which consequence) really easily. I also understand problem, and find solutions much faster than most of peoples, I have strong Intuition of things, but I have difficulties explaining how I've found the solution. Scientists think it may be related to Myelin. That stuff increase connection speed between neurons, so it makes you think "faster", but sometime faster than you conscience.

I also wants to give meaning to anything. If I take a nap and hear the wind in the trees, I immediately imagine air molecules traveling and hitting leaves, sound wave propagating and hitting my ears. Wind also blowing the small layer of hotter air near my skin, explaining why it feel cold, etc...

I see object through their functioning, not their usefulness. When I see any new machine, I don't really care what it does, but more how it does it.

I'm constantly flooded by information, and I'm constantly analyzing everything. Being in a crowed area is exhausting for me, because there are too many stimulus. I'm not going to faint or something, but I think being in a crowd for me is like being in a kindergarten class full of screaming children.

I don't talk a lot because I'm easily bored by small-talks. I don't see the point of speaking about what I've done this week end, or the weather, or anything. I prefer staying in my own bubble speaking to myself.

I don't feel part of this world, I more feel like an observer watching some weird TV show. I don't understand most of human reaction.

If you are French speaking, I strongly encourage you to read the comics Comme oiseau dans bocal. It's based on serious research and is a very good popular science story about IQ, giftedness, etc...

[–] Global_Liberty@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

This mirrors my experience.

I was determined to have an IQ of 139 at age eight by a school psychologist. I was educated in a special program, attended an Ivy League university in the US, finished graduate school in the top 1% of my class, and work a well compensated job I dislike and will leave shortly.

To answer the main question, I find it isolating and a bit scary right now, but also stress-relieving.

I cannot connect with the average person though I really like some for their kindness. This is because I have a different lived experience. I consume different media. I don't have their problems (money, vices, romantic instability, political agitation). I dislike how populism and hatred are rising, and am concerned that we are ignoring real issues (climate change, deficit spending, pollution) for fake ones (immigrants, "woke" culture, crime). At the same time, I wealthy by any objective standard, don't have to work, and follow most medical guidelines (little exercise due to work schedule) so weigh an appropriate amount and am in good health.

I will acquire the book you recommend. My read French is decent. I have thought little about my IQ and perhaps should.

[–] borokov@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing.

I've never had serious IQ test. I scored between 130 and 160 on some online tests, where my friends were around 100/110. My psy told me I could pass a real test if I want, but added it would be a waste of time (and money) regarding all the other elements she detect in me.

I always was the smart kid at school, but In all their wisdom, some teachers thought it would be a good idea to put me with low level students to pull them up. I ended up with bunch of retard that bullied me for not being stupid enough. Hard time, but now I have a good job in scientific domain which pay well, a nice house and a few motorbike in my garage. In a way, I got my revenge.

I feel like you regarding populism and hatred. I don't understand how people could be so easily manipulated. I stop watching TV and mainstream media anyway. I'm not really aware of what happen in the world, but I feel better this way. I prefer travelling and really see how beautiful the world is than watching news repeating how doomed we are.

[–] Global_Liberty@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

IQ tests are largely worthless, so I wouldn't take one formally.

Sorry about your school experience. Being placed in a gifted program allowed me to make friends with similar people.

I am envious of your career in the sciences. I foolishly pursued business, and while it has been financially rewarding, I am left with a sense of emptiness.

My job and residence in Florida require me to follow the news to avoid the nonsense inflicted by populist leaders, but I spend my free time in nature or traveling like you.

It is nice to connect to someone online with a similar experience.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next β€Ί