this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
560 points (97.9% liked)

Not The Onion

16508 readers
1765 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gamer@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago

If they can't manage to trick the stupids into supporting Medicare cuts, then tricking them into killing themselves with dangerous medical misinformation is another way to reduce government spending.

[–] SlothMama@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

What an absolute fucking retarded thing to say for insulin dependent people

[–] Cocopanda@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Ah yes. The 80’s coke heads in charge of things. Think they know better.

[–] Robotsandstuff@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

They're all fucking weirdos and idiots if I had a shop I couldn't trust any if this lot to work the till alone. If they where poor they would have all died by now.

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 131 points 1 week ago (5 children)

A good rule of thumb whenever I hear anything about what this administration does in regards to health I try to look at it through the lens of eugenics. They want to get rid of the people they consider "weak" and think that using money to help those that need it to be a waste of money. People with autism, weak immune systems, chronic illnesses, poor people, drug addicts, and pretty much anyone else they consider undesirable and less than human. Also, they consider our tax money as their personal bank account as if the country was a company and our taxes are their profits. Pretty fucked up, but it makes more sense than trying to rationalize clearly irrational behavior.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Weird. The only thing I can think is that we should string these motherfuckers up asap.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, but it’s good to know how we got here

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

That's how we prevent this, which we did not.

All we have left is reaction.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world 63 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Ahh yes, the starvation diet is back on the menu for type 1's, boys!

I recall back in the day the longest anyone lived on the starvation diet before insulin developed was a year or 2.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (10 children)

To be fair, our western diet of mainly cheap non-nutritive carbs suck. America needs desperately to change their diet but when Michelle Obama tried to encourage better eating habits the Republicans attacked her. JFK jr, on the other hand is totally nuts.
It must have been quit a challenge to find the most incompetent losers to fill the failed, fucked-up, fat, fascist, felon's cabinet.

[–] nelly_man@lemmy.world 45 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's no need to be fair here. Insulin is absolutely essential for diabetics, and the head of the FDA trying to proclaim that cooking classes are a viable alternative is nonsense. For type 1 diabetics, no amount of healthy eating is going to get their body to produce insulin. For type 2 diabetics, it is possible to eventually get to a point where you can be stable without insulin, but not for everybody and not right away. Insulin treatment is the only way to survive with diabetes for an extended period of time, and the focus needs to be on ensuring that insulin is both affordable and accessible.

Yes, there are things to improve in our food supply, but don't let that distract from how egregiously insane his comments are about diabetes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

To be fair

Well there's your problem. Never hand it to fascists (or grifters, or cult leaders, etc. — basically any kind of bad faith actors).

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 45 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

People are too tired and overworked to cook. Poor people are far more likely to spend too much time commuting to work too.

And their suggestion only addresses one type of diabetes. There’s a whole other type of diabetes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NotAGamer@lemmy.org 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People will die because of these fuck holes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

"Try not being so fat, you fucking fatties" is a reaction I have heard from people who are themselves overweight. It's genuinely maddening to see how many Americans are sold on the most superficial understanding of "healthy" as "fuckable" rather than "capable and resilient".

So much of the Trump attitude towards health seems to be geared towards eugenics against old ugly poors.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

That’s what’s stupid too is most of the eugenics are directed at things eugenics don’t even “fix” - it doesn’t matter how well bred you are you will get old and we already have plenty of hot and smart poor people, lots of them even have college educations beyond that, beauty is in the eye of the beholder

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Embargo@lemm.ee 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

TIL the head of the FDA has the inability to take half a second and google the word diabetes.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

No! Stop acting like they're all stupid, that's what they want you to think.

He was a pancreatic surgeon at Johns Hopkins. It's literally impossible for him to not be familiar with diabetes unless he has experienced serve memory loss recently.

He's pushing eugenics and wanting to kill off people with chronic illnesses

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Aka murder, and not some other type of anything. It's just murder.

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This. It's literally just suggesting "well how about we just let them die", AKA murder. The HHS especially is now just being filled with eugenicists who are, in general, too chickenshit to just come out and say "well we should kill all of them".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)

Time to go all Wilford Brimley on his ass.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Is a total ban on diabetes medicine on the way? This is an effort to kill anyone who isn't young and fit.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (8 children)

Yeah, I’d say yes. It's a primer and warning shot. They’ll roll it out in phases.

It gets a reaction out of us. And not always a logical one. A lot of people’s gut instinct is just to deny whatever “they” say. That does two things:

First, it gets their base thinking and talking about how many T2 diabetics are supposedly just consequences of lifestyle.

Second, it pushes the left into reflexively denying that even though it’s partly true. So now, when any real conversation comes up, there’s already a schism. And they can use that to sneak more garbage through, stuff that benefits them and their friends.

Can we head them off at the pass?

No. Never.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Is he suggesting that the US is going to fund free cooking classes that are low in fat and sugar? Because that's a great idea.

And they should also provide free insulin.

Maybe we can compromise and say that you have to attend 4 hours of free cooking classes every month to receive your free insulin for the month?

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 15 points 1 week ago

They're not going to fund anything. Nothing is free.

It's a great idea, and they'll just talk about it while killing the presently funded programs, then do nothing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 20 points 1 week ago

Considering that the GOP wants to kill SNAP, it is pretty clear that RFK wants his hands bloodied.

This guy, like the rest of that lot, are butchers of the innocent and trusting.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Challenge Accepted.

Simpsons TV show still where Lisa is holding a book seemingly titled “How to cook humans”

We’ll get insurers and Medicaid to fully cover diabetes supplies in no time.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

His blood sugar is high! Quickly!

drags his comatose body to the nearest cooking class

There we go!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] el_bhm@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

Fascist could also try a bullet salad.

[–] OCATMBBL@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Syringes for me, but not for thee.

[–] Nagrom@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 week ago

So many factors involved in controlling A1C. Not just your diet but lifestyle, exercise, access to health care and healthy inexpensive food.

[–] BeMoreCareful@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Isn't that not how diabetes works?

I'm an idiot about biology anything, let alone food and drugs, but I know that.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

There are several types of diabetes. It's a disease that keeps your body from turning sugar into energy or fat so it floats around in your blood corroding your organs and fine blood vessels, and can outright kill you with shock if too much sugar builds up in your blood. (very simplified.)

Type 2 is the most common, this where you don't produce enough insulin, the chemical that turns your sugar into power or fat storage. You have to both take care with your diet and constantly monitor your blood sugar, and you have to often take insulin daily to balance it. Some people have reversed type-2 with very rigorous diets and exercise, and some people at risk can avoid it altogether by keeping blood sugar low throughout their life, but if you have a predisposition to type-2, you may end up with the disease for life even if you do everything right.

Type 1 is where you body produces NO insulin of your own. Totally broken. This was typically a fairly certain and swift death-sentence before insulin was developed. People with type-1 are not people who have dietary problems or bad habits, they have organ failure which can be caused by a variety of things, usually genetics or other diseases.

These diseases effect all ages and all walks of life. Beware the next wave of propaganda that will depict diabetes sufferers as some kind of slobs who can't take care of themselve and it's their own fault for being sick. This is already how many people see diabetes. It doesn't help with the fascist goals that often people of color and non-white ethnicities and poor people are particularly susceptible to diabetes.

[–] faythofdragons@slrpnk.net 1 points 6 days ago

Another complication that often gets left out is that there's even a type of diabetes that has nothing to do with insulin or blood sugar, but vasopressin. It's far more rare, but people with that won't be helped with diet either, so it's worth a mention.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

You know, during ww2 when Britain enact very harsh rationing the rate of diabetes and heart disease did drop greatly. Because many fatty staples and meat were hard to come by and sugar was nearly nonexistent.

But you know what was instrumental in increasing life expectancy by almost 10 years almost overnight? The NHS after the war. Even when rationing fully ended in the late 50s life expectancy continued to be much higher despite all the previously hard to get stuff becoming readily available again.

load more comments
view more: next ›