Primary. We don't need losing candidates coming back to lose again.
But I'm not holding my breath for the Dems to actually hold a fair primary. Progressives need a new party.
this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2025
68 points (94.7% liked)
politics
25018 readers
2699 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Maybe her and Hillary should run together….
That would be a winning combo for sure.
Do you think Ghislaine would run as the first woman president?
Can we get a fucking primary this time
The DNC will allow a primary but will find ways to fuck around with Iowa voters and Dem Debates. Oh and if there is a clear popular winner they will ignore them because democracy is a joke to the democrats.
It's been going great for them so far, why fuck with the playbook?
Yeah at this point they only have to be slightly better than the Fascist party to have a chance with half the voters.
Good cop bad cop type of democracy. That's what FPTP creates.
Please, no. I respect that Harris had an uphill battle in 2024, and that Biden handed her an absolute shit show of a campaign to clean up; and it's a miracle the election was actually as close as it was... but please, no. Harris ran away after the election and stayed absent for 7 months while the US turned to fucking shit.
we need fighters., Not fairweather bandwagoneers. Sorry.
I'm not interested in anyone, unless they're speaking out against the regime now. She's not, so she can just step back.
Not voting for anyone not promising retribution on this regime and its supporters. If that means we lose again so be it - apparently we need to hit rock bottom to fix (rather than band-aid) this problem.
We know damn well there will not be free and fair elections anymore, so anyone "promising retribution" is committing political suicide. There will be no perfect candidate.
Well it’s probably a calculated risk to stay quiet. Dems gain nothing by focusing attention on her right now. On the other hand, letting the republicans make asses of themselves and swooping in offering a solution to their mess just before an election would fare better.
There is about a 0% chance of Kamala being the next candidate for President on the Democratic side.
Running terrible, unpopular candidates is kind of their whole schtick though. So it might well happen.
While vehemently opposing popular candidates.
There's a 0% chance of her winning, but definitely a non-zero chance of her being the dem's candidate.
Place your bets then.
Jfc please don't. Learn from your mistakes Democrats, you fuckin cowards in hiding. Democrats are tried of the aging group that is not taking to normal citizens. They are so full up their asses that they haven't realized they have also become the problem. The Democrats are at a 34% approval rate.
Let the new bloods in and take the lead on this already.
"We hear you. We see you. Here's Liz Cheney as our middle of the road candidate. And her VP? Joe Biden"
Now that I typed this out, there's a non-zero percent chance it could come to fruition. Sorry
Nah, they're lining up behind Gavin Newsom because it's "his turn". These people are so clueless
Calling it now: Hillary is gonna try again.
Bernie and AOC had better get an Independent ticket together if Harris thinks she's going to get into the race again. Fuck that.
Bernie will be fucking 90. Its not going to happen and would kill him if it did.
Jasmine Crocket might be an interesting second to AOC, there's others, too. make the primary ranked choice; get rid of the super delegates, and force states to run an actual primary; with every state ran on the same day. Sorry, Iowa, but you fucked too many primaries to be considered useful.
CA needs someone that is going to do something drastic against investors owning homes.
https://www.sfgate.com/realestate/article/investors-majority-homes-some-calif-counties-20780941.php
I don’t see Harris being proactive in any subject because she’s not a natural leader. She’s more suited to law enforcement.
CA needs someone that is going to do something drastic against investors owning homes.
2000% increase in property taxes, but owner-occupants are exempted. Only investors pay the tax.
And, any year the owner occupancy rate is less than 90%, the investor tax is increased another 20%.
"She's not the worst choice -- Harris 2028"
It's true, she wasn't. And yet ... 😑
JFC.
Why? We already know it's Trump 2028
Close the door! You're letting the air out!