696
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

e; I wrote a better headline than the ABC editors decided to and excerpted a bit more

According to the poll, conducted using Ipsos' Knowledge Panel, 86% of Americans think Biden, 81, is too old to serve another term as president. That figure includes 59% of Americans who think both he and former President Donald Trump, the Republican front-runner, are too old and 27% who think only Biden is too old.

Sixty-two percent of Americans think Trump, who is 77, is too old to serve as president. There is a large difference in how partisans view their respective nominees -- 73% of Democrats think Biden is too old to serve but only 35% of Republicans think Trump is too old to serve. Ninety-one percent of independents think Biden is too old to serve, and 71% say the same about Trump.

Concerns about both candidates' ages have increased since September when an ABC News/Washington Post poll found that 74% of Americans thought Biden -- the oldest commander in chief in U.S. history -- was too old to serve another term as president, and 49% said the same about Trump.

Archived at https://web.archive.org/web/20240214133801/https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/poll-americans-on-biden-age/story?id=107126589

Part that drew my eye,

The poll also comes days after the Senate failed to advance a bipartisan foreign aid bill with major new border provisions.

Americans find there is blame to go around on Congress' failure to pass legislation intended to decrease the number of illegal crossings at the U.S.-Mexico border -- with about the same number blaming the Republicans in Congress (53%), the Democrats (51%) and Biden (49%). Fewer, 39%, blame Trump.

More Americans trust that Trump would do a better job of handling immigration and the situation at the border than Biden -- 44%-26% -- according to the poll.

So that bipartisan border bill stunt was terrible policy, and it doesn't seem to have done anything for the Democratic party politically

Can we please stop trying to compromise with fascists now?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 138 points 9 months ago

We have a minimum age to become president, 35, so if that doesn't qualify as "age discrimination" then a maximum age limit shouldn't either.
65 should be the max, you get 30 years to try for the presidency then you're forced to retire.
And honestly that should be the maximum age for any elected official, not just the president.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 63 points 9 months ago

In America age discrimination is only illegal once you're 40 years old...

If you're 39 and 11 months, you can be denied a senior position for being too young, even if you have 20 years experience

Because old people write our laws, and they don't see a problem with telling a middle aged adult that they're too young.

If only one out of two groups have protection, it's not equaly opportunity, it's legislated discrimination.

It's insane because republicans constantly complain about valid equal opportunity, but never mention the one that's actually discriminatory.

It's especially insane when we have to pretend like an 81 year old magically is immune to scientifically proven medical facts

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

It is age discrimination but it's legal because it's built-in to the Constitution. Not joking, the "founders" decided that there was a such thing as too young but not too old.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 9 months ago

I think the founders made a lot of decisions based on the assumption that voters would vote in their own interests. This would preclude, for example, voting for insurrectionists, criminals, or corrupt power brokers.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 46 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Anything with eyes would say they are old. Yes, a 2-party system is broken in the modern world. Still Biden/ Harris as president is better then Putin's cuddle buddy.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Yes, a 2-party system is broken in the modern world.

I would love to have a 2-party system. But we have closer to a constellation of one party systems. Red States and Blue States, with a smattering of battlegrounds.

Between Winner-Take-All districts and the Electoral College, there's very little incentive to participate in an election in a municipality or state that's overwhelmingly one team or the other. And even when you do participate, you're limited to... what? People blowing up your phone and email with donation requests? A few months of block walking for a local candidate who you get to meet maybe twice and who barely knows your name? Running around bothering your friends a week before voting day not to sleep through this one? Getting drunk at a campaign event on election night, only to be dropped like a bad habit in the morning?

The parties themselves aren't really political entities. They're more like boosters for professional athletics teams or celebrity tours that you're expected to cheer for but never really interact with. They don't do anything outside of an election season. They don't provide any kind of constituent service or artery to the leadership themselves.

This consumerist politics is genuinely very different from the kind of organizing and activism that takes place throughout the rest of the democratic world. If it feels like Biden and Trump are just kinda being foisted on us by a cartel of party insiders, there's a good reason for it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

And a president isn't just the presidency, it also sets tons of agency heads and tons of judicial appointments including potential Supreme Court nominations. It's a major mistake to think of a presidential vote as a vote for one person, it's for tons of incredibly important positions that the president decides.

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 9 months ago

Even if that's true, wouldn't a younger person be better equipped to appoint and oversee those positions?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 46 points 9 months ago

I literally don't care if they Weekend at Bernies Biden, I will vote for him happily if the alternative is Trump.

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 28 points 9 months ago

Biden could drop out and they could nominate a literal piece of driftwood covered in seagull shit, and I would vote for the driftwood if it were between that and Trump.

[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 16 points 9 months ago

This might be the enlightened libertarian in me talking now, but I believe said driftwood would also be superior to Biden.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Driftwood probably wouldn't form the best cabinet though

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 39 points 9 months ago

Well, too bad. Those are the only two viable options, so most likely it's going to be one or the other. The time to do something about it has long passed. All we can do is hope Trump is jailed or either of them die.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 21 points 9 months ago

Best government ever created by man, right there

[-] Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world 20 points 9 months ago

There was NEVER anything any of us could do. The moment Biden announced he would run for reelection, everyone who mattered fell in line.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

All we can do is hope Trump is jailed

Nothing in the Constitution bars Trump from holding the Office of the President while in a super max prison.

Absolutely nothing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
[-] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 37 points 9 months ago

73% of Democrats think Biden is too old to serve but only 35% of Republicans think Trump is too old to serve. Ninety-one percent of independents think Biden is too old to serve, and 71% say the same about Trump.

This is one of the really interesting takeaways. People are looking at Biden's gaffes--and he has always made verbals gaffes throughout his career as a politician--and saying that it's a sign that he's too old. Meanwhile, Trump, who trails Biden by a mere four years of age, is viewed as energetic and mentally sharp by Republicans. So essentially, Dems are pretty realistic in their assessment of both candidate's ages, while Republicans are only realistic about Biden.

Also - forcing the Senate to vote against their own compromise bill, a bill they'd worked on for months, was a fantastic bit of hilarity. They know that they're not going to be able to get a better bill under Trump--because the majority in the Senate would still shoot down their worst tendencies--but they couldn't risk bucking Trump. So they undid all their own work. ::chef kiss::

[-] Blackbeard@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 3 days ago)
[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 9 months ago

You can tell because they made the argument 4 years ago that Biden was too old to serve at 77.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] stoly@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

You've basically just touched on how conservatives operate. It's never actually about any sort of philosophy, it has always been about control and projecting insecurities on the world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 28 points 9 months ago

I'll vote for someone other than Biden when there's someone else to vote for.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

But he's too old!

But her emails!

COMEON!

[-] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Anything goes just so they can win and sit back like Thanos after infinity war, smiling at the sun rise.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mellowheat@suppo.fi 19 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

You're not voting for only Trump or Biden. What you're also voting for is the people they bring in as admin.

[-] hyperhopper@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

Who cares? We shouldn't have the choices on the ballot being both choices that the majority of Americans don't want

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TotalSonic@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Sadly in this cycle even the declared independent and third party candidates are beyond mediocre so far as well. Stupidest election of my lifetime (and I was born when LBJ was Pres).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

But it doesn't matter because those are the choices

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 19 points 9 months ago

🦅 F R E E D O M 🇺🇸

[-] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 9 months ago

It really does matter. The implication is that the system is obviously broken because no one likes either choice.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Age is more than a number. Some people are very sharp at 80. Some are rapidly deteriorating at 60.

This is the point I wish everyone would remember when they're discussing this issue. It's not the age, but the 'wear and tear' that matters.

Some people age more gracefully than others, and we truly do want to have our elders wisdom, especially during trying times.

Having said all that, my personal opinion on all of this is that Biden seems to have cognitively/physically worn down past the level required for the decision-making/stresses of the office of the Presidency.

If he wants to have a third party doctor give him a cognizant test, and he passes it, and he publicly notifies all of us voters of that, then I would be up for voting for him again.

But judging based on the very little I'm allowed to see, as a voter, based on how few public news conferences that he does, and having seen him faltering in some of those, it truly does seem like it's time for him to move on.

Also IMO, Trump is a semen stain on the soul of America, and he quite literally is a test to see if America is America, or not. If we reaffirm our leader as someone who, as a 'wolf in sheeps clothing', is a very immoral and unethical grifter, then we are lost. All of us.

Not that it's going to happen, but both parties should be putting someone else up as their candidates for the presidency of the United States of America in 2024.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Well, who do y'all think can beat trump, because that's who's running in 4 years regardless of this election's outcome.

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 13 points 9 months ago

Any Democratic candidate with a pulse, and tbh we could probably get voters to moderate their expectations on both of those points if we had to

60% of the country has grown to hate and fear Trump just as much as 40% of it adores him

[-] nxdefiant@startrek.website 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I meant my question literally. If Biden wins 2024, Kamala 2028 feels like a bad decision. If it goes the other way, there's a non-zero chance the Dems are running against trump3, or a trump-like that beats him in the gop primaries, or both.

Whoever the Dems field in 2028 has to start making a name for themselves sooner rather than later, and I'm mostly disappointed the Dems aren't using the primaries as a way to show off that candidate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

The bothsiderist media is happy to let a fascist slide into office all while acting like they just have to harp on Biden's age.

Suppose Biden becomes unable to do the job. So what? There are plenty of capable people are him, and Harris will just assume the office. Big deal; not much changes.

But if tiny d gets into office...he's been promising to be the con movement's "vengeance" and promising to be a dictator (but only for a day, yeah right).

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Eggyhead@lemmy.world 10 points 9 months ago

What is the population percentage of boomers, around 40%, per chance?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] ChonkyOwlbear@lemmy.world 9 points 9 months ago

59% of Americans should have been paying attention a year ago when something could have been done about it. The choice is made now, so accept the reality and choose one (preferably the one who is not a convicted sex offender with 93 felony indictments).

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

59% of Americans should have been paying attention a year ago when something could have been done about it.

What thing? The Democrats basically didn't have a primary. All the potential internal rivals to Biden bowed out.

The Republicans had a conga-line of sacrificial lambs. I even saw a few spicy Op-Eds suggesting that a true anti-Trump Democrat should be actively campaigning for Ron DeSantis or Nikki Haley. But... Trump's a fucking hog. He's got every AM radio and Evangelical Church repping him. What were "59% of Americans" who'd been otherwise alienated from the political process supposed to do? Build an entirely new party from first principles and put... idfk... Mark Zuckerberg or Elon Musk on the top?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Odd_so_Star_so_Odd@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Isn't this why you have the VP running mates? You vote for them just as much.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I would vote for VP Kamala Harris to be POTUS before any of them others.

So Biden it is. The "Eisenhower Box" bends to No Hitler.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Feb 2024
696 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2119 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS