339
submitted 5 months ago by 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] maynarkh@feddit.nl 211 points 5 months ago

At least the priorities are in the right place. Abortion rights have not been acted on for a century, climate change is hard, Ukraine can't be helped, but the fundamental right for everyone to use their private jet anonymously has been protected.

[-] worldwidewave@lemmy.world 45 points 5 months ago

How about a minimum wage increase while the economy is so strong?

This country belongs to the ultra-rich, we just live here.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

God Bless America /s

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 months ago

Abortion rights were just acted on a year or two ago...

[-] athos77@kbin.social 210 points 5 months ago

This isn't really about Swift. It's about Elon Musk, and Clarence Thomas, and Donald Trump, and all the other corrupt narcissists who don't want you to know what they're up to.

[-] jumjummy@lemmy.world 103 points 5 months ago

And yet notice how these articles are all focused on Taylor Swift. After all, the owners can’t let articles point out their privilege and class disparity.

[-] TheUncannyObserver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 5 months ago

Well, she’s the one currently making a big fuss about people tracking her, so why wouldn’t they be focused on her? And what class disparity? They’re all billionaires, including Swift.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 months ago

Swift is helping bring down live nation/ticketmaster... So there's that too

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 13 points 5 months ago

There's no such thing as an ethical billionaire

[-] SatansMaggotyCumFart@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

TayTay throws more scraps to the people she’s stepped on to make her billion then most.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 6 points 5 months ago

That seems to be true but it doesn't change the previous statement

Unrelated, I see you around occasionally and your username always makes me irrationally happy, I blame my inner 13 year old. 🤣

[-] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 months ago

lol, PItbull "won" the air travel top spot last year and you don't hear shit from him about being tracked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] deaf_fish@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

T Swift: 1.1 billion

Elon: 197.3 billion

I wonder which one of these people more powerful and has more influence?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 140 points 5 months ago

Eat the rich. Congress works for them, not for us.

[-] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 28 points 5 months ago

All talk here. No action will be taken.

[-] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago

The only action people have is to vote people in power who are not absolute pieces of shit.

What they do once in office should directly affect your choice during the next election cycle.

Unfortunately most people vote blindly along their party lines.

So, yes, you’re right. It’s all talk here but it’s not like that talk can’t lead to actions.

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 months ago

But is that the only action people could take? What if some of these private jets just happened to catch fire in the middle of the night when no one is around?

[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 5 months ago

Be the change you want to see.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago

That's not the only action people have. It's just the only one that hasn't been criminalized yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 64 points 5 months ago

Fuck them all. Fuck every fucking one of these people.

[-] Jackcooper@lemmy.world 55 points 5 months ago

I don't want to engage in whataboutism but the fact is when they pass a law for one thing it's at the cost of something else that will never see the floor

The house passed a bill to help reign in insurance-pharmacy middle men (PBMs) who are directly responsible for the shitty system and pharmacy closures we are all experiencing. Schumer wont put it on the floor because it's not a priority. But Musks private jets are.

[-] rc_buggy@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 months ago

This isn't a stand alone bill, it's just an amendment in the FAA re-authorization bill. They have to pass this bill every 5 years to keep air traffic going.

like /u/toiletobserver memed in this thread, "Challenge Accepted". All the airplanes are still going to have to broadcast ID through ADS-B. They are going to shuffle the N-numbers around but I'm sure we're going to have the finest geeks on the case deciphering who is who in the air based on where people end up on the ground.

[-] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 5 months ago

Yeah, "impossible" is almost certainly an overstatement. Just harder.

[-] mombutt_long_and_low@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

I don’t know whether to laugh or scream at how outrageous it is that out of all the issues that could benefit from bipartisan cooperation, THIS is what we get. Bunch of turds.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago

Fuck them all.

[-] Nom@lemm.ee 9 points 5 months ago

We don't have to think hard as it actually is a bipartisan issue. Their lifestyles are now harder to track by us so it helps both party's and their sugar daddies/mommies.

[-] UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world 54 points 5 months ago

The rich looking out for themselves

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 53 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

billionaires get this sort of data privacy amendment, while regular Americans get surveillance capitalism as usual.

Well to be entirely fair, the amendment just says "private plane registration, so this should apply to billionaire jets but also down to the dinky weekend 1971 Cessna that a "regular American" owns

ETA: actually now that I think about it, drones above a certain dinky threshold also require registration, so those would be covered as well I'd think

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 35 points 5 months ago

I'm guessing the owner of a dinky 1971 Cessna most likely doesn't care if they can be found on an FAA tracker website. Taylor Swift and Elon Musk, on the other hand...

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] matlag@sh.itjust.works 41 points 5 months ago

At last constant surveillance is deemed a problem, which is why ultra-rich have their privacy protected, while you, peons, keep being monitored.

[-] ghostblackout@lemmy.world 30 points 5 months ago

Ok I'm just going to make a open source project to track that's jets adsb Signal and let people put a reserve at there house oh wait that's just flight 24 it doesn't matter what law makers do she can always be tracked by 1 person with a sdr and a antenna

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago
[-] FartsWithAnAccent@lemmy.world 19 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

What a bunch of bullshit, yet another example of how billionaires get their interests served but we just get to help make them even richer while being taxed, but not represented because we can't afford the ~~bribes~~ lobbying.

[-] ReiRose@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

Yup. Its amazing how quick and efficient the government is when rich peoples interests are involved

[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago

So... so... so... soooooo... many problems in this world and this is what they rush to "fix". Wanna bet someone is going to figure out how to tie plane registration numbers with people regardless, do it through some third-world country who doesn't give a shit about USA and we are back to square one.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MonkderDritte@feddit.de 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

will allow private aircraft owners to anonymize their registration information

Can't be misused for terrorism, huh?

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 5 months ago

But then how will we know when she takes her private jet jet jet to her private jet jet to her to her private jet?

[-] firecat@kbin.social 14 points 5 months ago

Too late, everyone jets had been tag and last known location will still reveal who they are. Useless bill as always.

[-] TheUncannyObserver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 5 months ago

Not only that, but it’s not hard to figure out what planes are owned by whom simply by checking which planes follow celebrities around. If the exact same plane has been at the last ten places Taylor Swift has been, at the same time as her, and left when she did, it’s not that hard to connect the dots.

[-] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 5 months ago

They still have to run ADS-B transponders. This just makes it harder to link the person to the plane.

[-] DrummXYBA@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 months ago
[-] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 5 points 5 months ago

Tell me again that Swift isn't an asset of the deep state.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 May 2024
339 points (95.0% liked)

News

23259 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS