496
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 240 points 1 year ago

How about no drug adverts? Is that really so hard? I don't know a single person who has ever asked their doctor about something they saw on TV.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

They're only legal in two countries- the U.S. and New Zealand.

[-] metaStatic@kbin.social 48 points 1 year ago

if you didn't say NZ I literally would never have guessed. That's an actual shock.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I was amazed when I found out too. Such a weird country to have that be legal.

[-] TheFarm@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

Canada has drug ads, but with special rules. You can either mention the drug name or its indication, but not both.

So you'll get ads that say stuff like "Ozempic - ask your doctor if it's right for you" with people happily eating in a coffeeshop. But they won't tell you what Ozempic is supposed to do.

[-] Default_Defect@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

Is that the one with the song and dance number? Probs anal seepage.

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Akshully according to the article it's only legal in 2 MAJOR countries. I'm curious to know which minor countries it's legal in.

[-] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Kiwi's a bit perplexed they were called a major country...

[-] XbSuper@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I guess the author considers Canada a minor country.

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

They weren't going by landmass if it's legal in Canada.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

Had a friend with a parent that was a doctor. Apparently she could tell which commercials were getting pushed more based on what patients kept asking for.

[-] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 year ago

Doc, I think I have moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis, menopause, and erectile dysfunction.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 20 points 1 year ago

While I agree in principle, there are people with fibromyalgia who wouldn’t know medications exist for it otherwise, because their doctors barely understand fibromyalgia.

[-] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 28 points 1 year ago

"hmmm have you considered that chronic pain isn't real and you're lying? Don't worry, I'm still going to bill your insurance for the full price of an office visit."

[-] SeaJ@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago

You could always do like I do: not be a woman. No fibromyalgia for me at all. My mother and sister keep ignoring that advice.

But on a more serious note, that really has to suck. Autoimmune diseases are much more likely to affect women and are more likely to be ignored. There was a cool Radiolab episode on them. A hypothesis is that women have an overall more sensitive immune system because their immune system is suppressed during pregnancy so having a more sensitive one means you are less likely to get sick during pregnancy. Use of hormones like estriol seem to be helpful. But if you suffer from fibromyalgia, you probably know a good amount/all of that info and more.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago

That is exactly it. One of my family members suffered from it for years before finding out about it online, and eventually had to switch to a new doctor that didn’t try to convince them it was all in their head. It’s hard to accept that the weight of a thin bed sheet on your legs being painful is just in your head, yet that’s the line they were given repeatedly.

[-] Fal@yiffit.net 9 points 1 year ago

This is true for a lot of other cases too. People live with chronic conditions because they either don't know that it's an issue and there's treatment, or they sought treatment and there wasn't any help at the time, and since then there have been new drugs release

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There’s so much new stuff coming out that most doctors don’t know anything about it until someone mentions it or they go look it up on the internet. Some will only refer to their huge out-of-date drug encyclopedia and if it’s not there you’re SOL.

I know a few people with fibromyalgia who didn’t know that’s what they had until they saw a commercial for it. Doctors never mentioned it as a possible diagnosis.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Almost as if doctors need CE training, huh?

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

And even then there would still be blind spots.

[-] Ghost33313@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

As someone who worked in the medical CE space, oh yea. The doctors who have the most pull are the dinosaurs who have been using the same techniques for decades. Meanwhile the doctors with fresher views and novel techniques based upon new evidence struggle to get a dozen doctors to attend.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Especially for general practitioners. If you’re a specialist with a narrow focus it’s ~~easier~~ not as difficult to stay current but if you’re expected to know enough about everything to refer patients to those specialists, there’s a lot to stay current on, even if you’re motivated to do so.

[-] FaceDeer@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Most people don't even Google their medications or illnesses. "Ask your doctor about" is frankly not bad advice much of the time.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I was so happy when I heard my doctor schooling a few pharma reps on how the drug they were pushing actually works.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Unclear… do you mean for the better or worse? Could go either way.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure I understand your confusion.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

how the drug they were pushing actually works

Does that mean he/she was explaining the mechanism by which it works and it was good? Or was she/he explaining negative side effects they failed to mention or didn’t understand? Something else?

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Ah, she was just correcting them on the mechanism of action, so I don't think it was a good or bad thing. I was paying and leaving, so I couldn't stay for the whole convo.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Thank you for coming back to this! Yes, that sounds like a great doctor, good to hear she wasn’t having to school them on how it was causing harm or something like that.

[-] Endorkend@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Then the drive should be to fix that problem rather than the symptom.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's several chronic pain conditions, such as fibromyalgia, that we don't often know what the underlying problem is.

So, we give people medication that reduces the chronic pain they live with everyday.

And as one of those people, I'll keep taking nerve blockers if it means I don't spend half the week praying for death.

[-] mateomaui@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah good luck with that.

[-] magnetosphere@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago

I wonder if they should only allow generalized, industry-wide ads that don’t focus on a specific drug, or even company.

You know, like we see ads for broad categories of food, like cheese, beef, and milk, for some reason.

“Did you know that new treatments are available for things like fibromyalgia, depression, and heart disease? Talk to your doctor today!”

[-] kungen@feddit.nu 9 points 1 year ago

we see ads for broad categories of food, like cheese, beef, and milk, for some reason.

What TV channels are you watching?

[-] Endoran@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] PainInTheAES@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] stolid_agnostic@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

Actually about 50% of the time your doctor will give it to you just by you asking. That's why they do this. You're not a person that advertising works on, but remember that the country is filled with monkeys.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Maybe not medications, but people generally write off benign symptoms quickly, and a series of benign symptoms can often be an indication of something more serious.

Then that person sees a commercial and it lists all the symptoms they've been having at once and it makes them go "Hey wait a minute, all those symptoms sound familiar, maybe I should make an appointment"

Iirc there was a study a few years ago that determined that medication commercials can increase the rate people see doctors.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Then you have to spend years trying to convince your doctor that it's not because you're overweight or just imagining it.

[-] cm0002@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well yea, but that's a whole separate issue

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I actually did with Ubrelvy for migraines, but it was something my doctor was about to give me samples of anyway.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Awareness is probably what they're after, and it's probably worth billions to the pharmaceutical industry and the congressmen they own.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

All of the medications that are little more than QoL things. Frequent urinarion. ED. Dry mouth.

Things you wouldn’t normally ask a doctor about being a condition.

[-] CarlsIII@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

But where else can I hear that awful “nothing is everything” song?!

[-] return2ozma@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That's not very capitalist of you! MURICA! /s

this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2023
496 points (99.2% liked)

News

23311 readers
3475 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS