308
submitted 1 year ago by GiddyGap@lemm.ee to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 189 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My wife's work is making people come back in office, and she's above the 50-mile limit they set. (Not only that, she's worked from home for 10 years now). She brought that up, and they said they were looking into possibly expanding it out. She told her boss if that happens, she's gone, and they lose someone with almost 19 years of experience who literally writes their training manuals on how to do what she does, lol.

The shear stupidity of these people is astonishing. If I ran a company, it would be nothing but WFH, and I would poach so many good workers, lol.

[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

But how will you make sure their every waking moment is devoted to work? Gotta invest in some ridiculous office space and middle managers to crack the whip.

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago

That's the thing - if I'm being forced to come into an office when my work doesn't require it, I am 100% a clock watcher, and outside my scheduled work hours, I an unavailable. You sent me an email at 5:01 PM on Friday? I'll read it at 8:00 AM on Monday.

Take away my flexibility, and I take away yours.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I don't understand the other side of this. I work from home and already do this. Work from home is not 24 hours work unless you let it be that. My clock strikes 5pm and my laptop is turned off.

[-] dman87@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

WFH can enable flexibility on both parts. But, it's highly variable depending on the employer. I might be able to slip out and go to a dentist appointment in the middle of the day without using comp leave, etc. If the employer allows me that flexibility, I may be more willing to be more flexible to respond to an email or a message after hours on occasion. The flexibility is give and take between the employer and the employee.

Now, I understand that not everyone wants that. For me personally with kids to deal with and family things that come up here and there, I much prefer the flexibility and the occasional work evening that's a bit later or the occasional work morning that's a bit earlier. Then I can save my comp leave time for when my kids are out of school or I want to plan a vacation rather than using it up on the small trivial things throughout the year.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PrincessLeiasCat@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 year ago

There is a guy in our group who had a special arrangement because his wife was sick so they allowed him to WFH regularly as long as he came in for certain things.

After Covid, they decided everyone needed to be back in the office NOW and didn’t want to have to deal with people whining because some people got a special pass that was in place before Covid, so they took it away from him.

Instead of answering the hard (obvious) questions and being irritated for a finite amount of time, they made this guy upend his whole life (he lives many hours away) and that of his family - to return to work on a regular basis.

Failure of fucking leadership right there.

[-] legios@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago

I've set up 'informal working arrangements' for a few people in my team because of family arrangements, health etc.

I might have also told one of the execs that I thought the return to office policy was BS while tipsy one night. He did agree though...

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

That's a really small bubble. My employer has a 125km range before we can request an exemption to the 2-day-a-week policy.

Hopefully things don't change for your wife!

[-] just_change_it@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if that happens, she’s gone, and they lose someone with almost 19 years of experience who literally writes their training manuals on how to do what she does, lol.

She openly told her boss that if they tell her to come into the office she will willingly quit the job and forfeit unemployment so they can downsize that headcount and spread around the work to other employees?

Gotta play 3D chess, don't show them your hand. They now have an easy way to fire her on demand without cause and without having a mark on their employment numbers.

Have to go with the angle of: if you make me move you need to pay my relocation costs because you have asked me to move. After all, this isn't new and they have known your home address for 10 years. Make them cover the increased cost or they get to pay unemployment for laying you off. That's the only real angle you probably have anyway that gives them a cost.

Not to mention she wrote a manual on her job so her replacement will have an easy time picking up.

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

If she’s as petty as I am, the manual will receive a rather intense update prior to her departure.

Better make sure version history is off

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

*sheer fyi

Shear is a verb

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 018118055@sopuli.xyz 63 points 1 year ago

Crash the housing market to save the office building market

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

The housing market needs to crash. Prices nationwide are insane. Bubble needs to pop

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Badass_panda@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

I'm OK with that, the housing market is in a giant bubble and it needs to crash. I say that as someone who bought a house at the lowest price point right at the start of the pandemic, combined with an incredibly low interest rate. Theoretically my home is worth almost 50% more now, 4 years later.

Thaaaaat's a bubble.

[-] aesthelete@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Theoretically my home is worth almost 50% more now, 4 years later.

Yep, and having your house have a higher paper value doesn't help you much at all as a home buyer that lives in the place. Your taxes go up in most localities, and it makes upgrading that much more impossible because everything else went up in price too.

It only helps if you want to move to some other place where prices are much lower, which I'm good on moving to Idaho or whatever.

It's great for your paper net worth.....yay. 🙄

[-] GillyGumbo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

tbf, this is probably suburban / rural areas to move back into urban areas that are already having crises. Won't fix any of the housing markets in high population centers.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"My sellers both work at the same company, which told them they have to be in the office three days a week or they'll lose their jobs. They have six months to make the move. They'll probably have to take a $100,000 loss on their home," Pendleton said.

Pretty sure I would rent out the home instead of taking a $100,000 loss? Rent something to live in where you're moving to until it's more favorable to sell.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Six months is plenty of time to find a new job these days.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

In a lot of these WFH communities, the rental market softened with the rest of the housing market, so you might not have renters or have to take a hit on the rent. Also, being a landlord more than a commute-able distance away from your property sounds like asking for trouble, unless you hire a property manager, but that's another hit to your income.

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Even if the market in some of these more remote areas softened a bit, I think taking a $100,000 hit over one year is crazy, though. Even if you lose $100 or $200 per month renting it out, that's a long ways from $100,000. Meanwhile, you're paying off the mortgage and building equity.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago

Yeah, that's nuts. Also, as a couple you both probably shouldn't be working for the same company from a risk reduction POV.

[-] Clent@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Rent to own is also an option.

That assumes you can get a back to ground be you two mortgages though.

This is an excellent opportunity for corporations to buy up homes.

The rich will only get richer until we stand up.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

After seeing the headline, I thought it would be people moving farther away to be outside of the RTO radius. Instead its people moving closer to work because they are cities/states away with WFH.

[-] Odelay42@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

A lot of companies (Amazon) don't have a radius. It's RTO or nothing.

[-] yyyesss@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

nothing it is, then

[-] krellor@kbin.social 37 points 1 year ago

I know lots of companies are handling the wfh and return to office situation poorly. But to provide a counterpoint, at the start of covid, I led all the engineering teams in a large organization with dozens of sites. When we went to wfh we made it clear that we were authorizing remote work with the contingent that the team could be called in as needed, not to move outside of the area, and not to travel more than two hours away when on call (1 week every two months) etc. Sometimes things break bad enough you need the team's to be physically present at a location, or doing major border device work, etc.

Either the organizations didn't message properly, or a lot of people moved despite being told that the wfh wasn't a permanent remote work accommodation. I'm all for remote work and hybrid, etc, but on a personal level buying a house outside your commute range while knowing you might get called in someday and being brown to your job... just poor decision making.

Fwiw, I approved permanent remote with for all my staff who didn't have any physical responsibilities. For those whose jobs involved any physical infrastructure, the best a could do was hybrid with no minimum number of days in office, just come in as required for the work.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 year ago

Either the organizations didn’t message properly, or a lot of people moved despite being told that the wfh wasn’t a permanent remote work accommodation.

A lot of employers straight up lied. In some situations, management said employees would be permanent WFH but they didn't have that authority. In other situations, employers changed their mind and the employees have no recourse other than trying to call the employers bluff.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago

Yours is a sane and reasonable approach. Sometimes you need to drive down to the datacenter and push a button, or there's special equipment you need that is cheaper to have in one place. These jobs should be in person when necessary.

Pushing people to commute outside of this framework puts unnecessary strain on transportation networks and useless emissions in the environment.

[-] 0110010001100010@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

At my previous role, I ALWAYS wanted to be onsite at the datacenter if I was doing upgrades of critical systems. I'd sit in the lobby where it was quiet instead of on the datacenter floor but there was comfort knowing that if a button needed pushed I didn't have to drive 30 minutes to do it.

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

They definitely moved with the intent to be fired if called on-site permanently again. There were tons of comments to that degree during that time (and now).

Essentially, there's more than enough demand for tech skills. They can easily find another job that allows WFH.

It's fair. Shitty to honest managers trying to accommodate where plausible, but honestly, tiny violin vibes there.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

That wasn't poor decision making. That was knowing their worth. They knew if the company demanded a return to office they could simply continue working remote for a different company, likely with an increase in pay. Only a fool would alter their life plans for some company that might require RTO. Now they're enjoying improved quality of life while living where they prefer.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

I told my boss the other day my upper limit for in office time is one a week. We were 3 days a week before COVID, 0 during COVID, 1 a month after COVID, and just this month they upped it to twice a month.

Hell, if I stopped coming in at all right now there is no way in hell they'd fire me anyway. We have too much stuff to do and not enough time to do it. I know people think that but we've got contractual obligations to fill and new regulations to follow. It'd cost them way more to fire me and miss those deadlines waiting for new hires to get up to speed.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Dude, just don't go. If you're doing your job from home, why are they asking you to burn fuel and your time on earth sitting in fucking traffic???

[-] alienanimals@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If more people stood up for themselves, we wouldn't have this problem in the first place.

[-] Gerbler@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

If only more workers could stand up for themselves in unison. Like some united front. But what could we call it?

[-] solstice@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

It would be a lot easier to sell RTO if rent weren't outrageously high anywhere near a downtown central business district. I prefer office personally and don't mind a 20 minute commute or so but any more than that is a real drag. It's real hard for me to tell someone to fight an hour and a half of rush hour traffic just to get to the office and be harassed for 8-12 hours and then do it all again at night.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
308 points (97.8% liked)

News

23284 readers
3508 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS