Unexpectedly?
this post was submitted on 12 Feb 2025
540 points (96.4% liked)
News
27412 readers
4251 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I know I've seen this on several websites today. What was everyone expecting? The only think I can think of is the old trope that Republican administrations are better for the economy. I have coworkers who were basically expecting miracles once Trump got into office. Things are probably gonna be bad.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but don’t most (if not all) Republican administrations cause recessions or other damage to economies?
Every Republican presidential term in my lifetime has had a recession start. None of the Democratic ones have...
Regan; one started each term. First Bush had one in his term. Clinton had none in his 2 terms. Second Bush had a HUGE one each time (dot com and great recession). Obama had none in his 2 terms. trump had one in his first term (triggered by covid & shutdowns; which his (in)actions intensified...). Biden didn't have one (but; just barely... and only by the official definition [NBER]; he did have two negative real GDP quarters, so one could argue this point). Now we're starting trump's second term, so we'll see (it's pretty clear we'll have a recession within 2 years).
This isn't really debatable unless you ignore the evidence. Stock market and real GDP growth are overall way higher under Democrat presidents. One link for reference (but many more are available): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11127-021-00912-y
load more comments
(2 replies)
You are not wrong, I don't know where the other poster got their information, but Republicans almost always destroy the economy and the Democrats (kind of) fix it just in time to be blamed for the economy being bad.
The “trope” is public perception, not actual historical pattern. Every time a Republican president gets elected the exit polls are full of “economic concerns.” What that actually means is left to interpretation but so it goes.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
load more comments
(3 replies)
Somehow, inflation returned
Denial first, surprises later.
load more comments
(4 replies)
Unexpectedly? By who?
Pretty sure tons of people said that if Trump takes office, inflation would skyrocket thanks to the tarrifs and all his other bullshit... This was entirely expected. It's the result we all knew was coming if he took office.
If it were any Democrat in office right now, the media would have been pinning the blame harder than fighting games got blamed for violence in the 90s. Getting real sick of the narrative they're spinning.
If it were any Democrat in office right now, the media would have been pinning the blame harder
If a Democrat were in office inflation wouldn't have increased.
load more comments
(5 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Republicans just took power.
Not unexpected at all.
We hired one of the worst people in the world to lead us. It's a stretch to call this unexpected.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Unexpectedly?
Yiyre kidding, right? I was quite literally waiting for this news. It never wss an if, just how bad
What's unexpected about it? We re-elected a twice impeached anti-democratic felon rapist who utterly failed his last term.
Every American who could rub brain cells together warned this would happen.
Unfortunately, those people represent a minority in The Divided States of Dumbfuckistan.
sounds like BBC is doing damage control for mango mussolini.
the "unexpected" part is that the 3% is above the expected 2.9% rate. they're being coy; the title implies the increase is unexpected while the text shows it's just a tenth of a point above the rate that was expected.
the editors are not uneducated people. I bet they speak English pretty well. the wording is deliberately misleading.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
That article is carrying a lot of water for the Trump administration. Nobody knows why prices are going up!
Import tariffs are explicitly inflationary. Even the rhumor of them is arguably inflationary. Lowering the interest rate (which Trump is currently in the midst of bullying the Fed chair into doing ) is also explicitly inflationary.
All of the things he has done that actually pertain to inflation have been to increase it.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
!leopardsatemyface@lemmy.world
Good job on voting to cancel out Joe Biden’s monopoly breakup because he didn’t do it fast enough
"If things aren't good enough, we should make them worse to teach those layabouts a lesson!" - People who have no intention of suffering the consequences of their actions
load more comments
(1 replies)
There's nothing unexpected about it. Have they not been paying fucking attention to what the Orange Jackass had been doing to is?
load more comments
(1 replies)
“Unexpectedly”
If it’s anything to me, it’s unexpectedly low.
Shocked pikachu face
who ever wrote this article is a total moron. Unexpectedly? noo.
14 years of Conservative government has left the BBC senior ranks full of Tory placeholders and shills.
Unexpectedly by who!?
The people who voted for the authoritarian liar. They are equally shocked at the leopard knawing on their face.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I fucking love how there is basically only one comment on this entire post
load more comments
(2 replies)
"Unexpectedly"? Everyone but the MAGA idiots expected it.
The only thing unexpected here is the bad headline. Simply using the first sentence would be more accurate and meaningful
Wait. Unexpectedly for who? I certainly expected it. Most people I've talked with are also not surprised.
Then those interviewed and writing this article are idiots. 2024 article.
Yet most mainstream economists say Trump’s policy proposals wouldn’t vanquish inflation. They’d make it worse. They warn that his plans to impose huge tariffs on imported goods, deport millions of migrant workers and demand a voice in the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policies would likely send prices surging.
Sixteen Nobel Prize-winning economists signed a letter in June expressing fear that Trump’s proposals would “reignite’’ inflation, which has plummeted since peaking at 9.1% in 2022 and is nearly back to the Fed’s 2% target.
The Nobel economists noted that they aren’t alone in sounding the alarm.
Maaaybe tarrifs are not that great
It's been pretty great for China so far.
Wait, that's not what you meant, was it?
load more comments
(2 replies)
Who could have expected this
Thank President Musk and his First Lad Trump.
"unexpectedly" is a word they use but I am not sure they know what it means.
view more: next ›