this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2025
75 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10430 readers
539 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The chart from this article just posting it as the main link since it by far the best representation of the data I've seen.

https://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/most-retaliatory-tariffs-removed-1.7620036

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SamuelRJankis@sh.itjust.works 53 points 2 weeks ago

The article does skip over the 7 Billion from the Digital Service Tax we gave up as well.

https://www.pbo-dpb.ca/en/publications/LEG-2324-013-S--digital-services-tax--taxe-services-numeriques

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 24 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

What happened to elbows up?

[–] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago

We still have our wallets, and the will weaponize them.

[–] Gnumile@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

The consumers are the ones that end up paying the tariff costs. This is fine.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca -4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We voted in a traitor 🤷

Selling us out to make the line go up.

[–] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago (3 children)

But wasn't the other guy worse?

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

Yes.

I'm still not happy with Carney though.

[–] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We don't have a two party system. There was more than a binary choice.

Canadians need to forget this red vs blue 🐂💩

There are other options.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Only 2 had a realistic chance to form a Government.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's what sucks about a hypothetical let's say 20% 40% 40% split. The 20% supporters and others not confirmed always say well I'm not throwing away my vote and switch to voting for one of the 40% parties.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Both things are true.

shakes fist proportionately

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Fun fact, even with our shitty voting system if everyone votes a certain way things will go that way. It’s not a gamble, we can just vote for what we want. We can delay it and try to fix it when it’s even harder and more dangerous or start now.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I don't care too much about retaliatory tariffs to be honest. We're the ones paying for those anyway.

We shall continue boycotting to send them the middle finger

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The point of the tariffs is that we don't pay them because we don't buy those products. It makes it more economical to boycott, so more people do it, and profit driven companies will also do it.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It makes it more economical to boycott,

I guess technically? It makes boycotting more economically "sensible" but just because it makes it less economical to not boycott. It doesn't really benefit the people boycotting, it just penalizes those that for some reason don't.

If I could just pick and choose, I be down for keeping some targeted retaliatory tariffs up because I see the value in forcing the hand of people that would be otherwise indifferent (or worse) but most of the damage we've been doing to the US is not really tariff driven, e.g. booze, travel, groceries.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Frankly, considering what the US has said they wanted to do to us, I’m ok with making goods from there more expensive for people who don’t want to boycott. I’m ok with any purchases made from US companies costing more even if I find myself doing it for one reason or another, too, no matter how legitimate or innocent I personally think my reasons are.

[–] villasv@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Fair. I'd say me too. If anything, it helps me making sure that if I don't boycott on a purchase either intentionally or by mistake, at least there will be an extra tax collection for it.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

As an American, I say, "Keep boycotting the ever living fuck out of the USA."

[–] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

The boycott continues that’s what.

[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago

Boycotts on US goods and travel until ICE and Border Patrol agents are fired and barred from other customs or enforcement jobs. So basically forever.

[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Retaliatory tariffs only hurt Canadians. Find other sources or boycott.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Now this:

PS: It's a pretty good movie.

[–] Presently42@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Wow that's an unexpected reference! Bravo

[–] bear@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, it's actually an HD copy straight from the official source.

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

I agree that we should be doing something to retaliate against the US regime, but to be honest they’re doing a fine enough job of that themselves. Best thing we can do is pivot our exports to Europe & Asia, become a new leader to developing nations and emerging markets, and stop being vassal for US foreign policy. That’s what really hurts them, not import taxes.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

People will vote Con thinking they’ll somehow be more anti-American.