this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2025
347 points (97.8% liked)

politics

25799 readers
3517 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CeruleanRuin 174 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

The fucking nerve to even imply that an apology was expected or required.

[–] Rekhyt@lemmy.world 131 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sinclair was demanding one, so the fact that Kimmel did not apologize is significant.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why does anyone give a shit about Sinclair and Nextstar?

If they don’t want to air him, then don’t air him.

If people in those communities give a shit, then they can make some phone calls and send some emails.

If they don’t care, then they can watch whatever their abc affiliate wants to air.

Why the fuck do they think they can pressure the vast majority of viewers? Fuck Disney. Keep canceling Disney. This isn’t any kind of victory for free speech.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago

Why does anyone give a shit about Sinclair and Nextstar?

Because they own roughly 80% of all local tv stations in the US combined and de facto control most of the rest as well. They're basically the Texas Board of Education of local news if not WORSE.

Why the fuck do they think they can pressure the vast majority of viewers?

Because most if not all of the ABC affiliates you referred to are owned by them. The vast majority have no (legal) alternative

[–] Godwins_Law@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because Sinclair and Nextstar have local monopolies and defacto veto power over broadcasts? The move from Disney forces Sinclair to take the heat for caving and censorship. (Disney sucks for a LOT of reasons, and they should never have caved to begin with but reversing was the right thing to do)

[–] hector@lemmy.today 4 points 2 days ago

Caving in the first place means they cannot be trusted as one of the few remaining media conglomerates.

Boycott, divest, they will do it again.

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 48 points 2 days ago (5 children)

How was it not an apology when he said:

  • It was never his intention to make light of the murder of Kirk.
  • That he asks for compassion.
  • That he's not blaming any specific group.
  • That the alleged shooter was a deeply disturbed and sick individual.
  • That he gets why people were upset about his previous remarks.
  • That he has many friends and family members on the opposite side politically.
  • That violence is never the solution.
  • That the people on the right he knows and loves don't send him death threats.
[–] ngdev@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

not answering the question but want to point out "violence is never the solution" is propaganda. examples where violence is the solution include pretty much every country that had a war for independence

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

"Violence is never the solution"

Also:

"... the right to bear arms shall not be infringed"

"Castle Doctrine"

18 U.S. Code § 2381: "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death"

"When the looting starts, the shooting starts"

So.. why do we have guns again, if we cant use them since that's "violence"?

If someone invades my house, aren't I suppose to shoot the fucker like a good patriotic American?

🤔

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

None of that is an apology. An apology says 'Im sorry," and none of that says that. I'm glad he didn't apologize, he didn't say anything wrong.

AND he went hard after Brendan Carr AND Trump.

No, that wasn't an apology, that was gloating that he was back on the air, despite their efforts.

Fuck those treasonous MAGA Nazis.

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

All of it is an apology. An apology is just an explanation given after the fact. He felt the need to explain his actions further.

To be a full and complete apology many people expect all three of these components, but not All three are essential to every apology.

  • an acknowledgment of harm,
  • an expression of remorse,
  • a pledge of recompense.

You could argue that he didn't do a full and complete apology but you can't argue that he didn't apologize.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

By this definition you have just apologized for Rose's post.

[–] Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes. I am often an apologist for incomplete but well intentioned reasoning I encounter in the wild.

I try to first understand before I criticize and that has helped me to interpret other people's words better.

An apology is not a bad thing or a good thing. It is a thing.

There are plenty of apologies that could be delivered that would meet those criteria and also be really mean things to say that do not make someone feel better.

[–] Windex007@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

I think this definition of an apology is too far from common usage to be reasonably expected to be understood, and too broad to be useful in general.

If you want to refine your definition so that it's more than just an "explanation" (already have a word for that) I could maybe get on board.

And, to be honest, I'm a little bit worried about how one comes to equate an explanation with an apology. My gut tells me this definition creep might be a red flag of a victim of an abusive narcissist.

[–] titaniumarmor@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

It is true that “apology” is an overloaded term that can mean many things, depending on context.

You’ve stripped away the context (and therefore bent the word’s meaning here). The substance of what MAGA wanted was an expression of remorse. They thrive on instilling fear and shame in others. They loath details and nuance.

Lexical gymnastics don’t change the simple fact that Kimmel (1) did not express shame for what he said and instead (2) reiterated useful details and nuance. Both of these things oppose the MAGA movement, and that’s a good thing.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

What he said tonight was consistent with the instagram post he made before all the controversy:

He specifically did not address his statement that the MAGA crowd was desperate to paint the shooter as anyone other than one of them.

Which was an accurate statement, the right was making claims of "leftist violence" even before the shooter was identified, and they STILL are making the claims even though the shooters voter registration is unaffiliated with either party AND he failed to vote in 2024 or 2022 (he would have been only 17 in 2020).

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago

Also remember that the ONLY information we have originates from Kash Patel's FBI, and Pam Bondo's DOJ. I assume that literally every single word I hear from them, or any other MAGA agency, is a complete LIE.

THEY say he's a liberal? I don't believe it for a second.

[–] Cassanderer@thelemmy.club 3 points 2 days ago

That is what worries me. Kimmel was doing good work pointing out to everybody that they were trying to use this to go after their political enemies with the awesome power of the state and their private groups supported by the state. Now no seeming mention of it? We won a big victory , how exactly?

If he is now too scared to address the administration nurturing Brown Shirts to Target critics and opponents and media then that is a major victory for them.

And make no mistake, that is where are the administration is going with this, full Nazi. Luckily they are incompetent as shit but I would not expect that to stop them forever, not the least given the lackluster opposition.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago

Clarifying his comments is hardly an apology. If anything it’s a “fuck you morons, this is what was meant, go watch the bit if you were too stupid to get it the first time”.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 3 points 2 days ago

Sounds like he is pretending he said something wrong before.

That the right are using it to crack down on civil society, et al,is true, if kimmil is now ignoring that he can fuck off there is no use of his being there if too afraid to call out these thinly veiled attacks.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 79 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Apology for what? He did nothing wrong.

[–] nuggie_ss 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's all about showing loyalty to those in power.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Ok nuggie...

SS

Might want to reconsider that name or add a the

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 6 points 2 days ago

Maybe nuggie is a Super Sport model ..

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Full Streisand effect for me: I have watched 2 Kimmel videos in the past week or so - and none in the decades before that. And I laughed. Thanks MAGA, I guess.

Dressing up as a banana always works for me.

And I can't believe I'm writing this but Ted Cruz is right (watch the video if you don't get it).

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It makes me wonder how much ad spots cost for that night. Cancel the show, cancel all previous ad spots. Put the show back on, resell spots for double.

I know nothing about advertising, I assume the rate is based on time slot, but I just wouldn't put it past the network somehow profiting off of this.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

I guess neither Kimmel nor Colbert are getting poorer here, but they're still doing god's work.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Wait, did someone expect HIM to apologize?

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I mean, watching it, he did apologize. And then to proclaim that he loved Jesus....

[–] DNS@discuss.online 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I tuned out after that. People expecting Kimmel to be on the same level as Jon Stewart or John Oliver are delusional. Kimmel is more like Fallon, just with better jokes.

Kimmel also glossed over how Erika Kirk's forgiveness was fake after, especially since it resembled a WWE broadcast.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

And, I don't watch him, but follow the news regarding all of them, and last night stayed up to watch it, soon as he did that I noped out.

[–] 7toed@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh and donate to kirks ToiletPaper USA as per sinclair's demands, glad he didn't bend any knees.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago

You mean so I can wipe my ass eoyh Kirk's face?

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 2 days ago (2 children)

“It was never my intention to make light of the murder of a young man,” Kimmel said Tuesday, getting choked up. “I don’t think there’s anything funny about it.”

Thats the thing tho Jimmy... It is fucking funny as shit.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hilarious, even. Especially since he leaned left.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

MAGA on MAGA violence is best case scenario. I want more MAGA on MAGA violence. MORRREEE!

MORRREEE

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today -5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ironic, maybe, but not funny. Nothing about any of this is funny.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm laughing. Fuck Charlie Kirk.

The irony is whats funny.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] xyzzy@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There was a lot to navigate successfully and I think he did a great job doing so.

Clarified without apologizing, hit Carr and Trump pretty hard, brushed off Sinclair and Nexstar entirely except to tell people his show is not available in certain markets, and stepped into the free speech moment to highlight others at risk and something else we should all be aware of (Hegseth's loyalty pledge demand).

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

Any apology would be dead wrong. There is nothing to apologize about.

[–] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I cracked up at the Disney requiring him to say one thing part.

They aren't getting my money back.

[–] hector@lemmy.today 1 points 2 days ago
[–] hector@lemmy.today -2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 days ago

Fuck Sinclair and Nexstar.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 3 points 2 days ago

And he opened with a Jack Paar line, how Iconic.