430
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

Check this bit from the end:

In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to "convey the government’s message," and that can be accomplished through "the removal of speech that the government disapproves."

[-] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

What in the absolute fuck?

[-] itsonlygeorge@reddthat.com 10 points 10 months ago
[-] Uglyhead@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Blessed Bog Brother Be

Under His Allseeing Eye

[-] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

We prefer swamp people.

[-] catch22@startrek.website 15 points 10 months ago

They keep sayin' we're free, but we're all just loose.

[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

...Whoever told you that is your enemy.

[-] Facebones@reddthat.com 10 points 10 months ago

The party of small govt (except for pushing christofascism)

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Ashley Moody is a fascist traitor

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@sh.itjust.works 3 points 10 months ago

Jesus Christ

[-] Zink@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago

Ok, I give up. You guys can let me out please. The shit you’re throwing into this simulation is just ridiculous.

[-] mineralfellow@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

That part stuck out to me, too. That is really terrifying.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 84 points 10 months ago

While I didn't think that they would go after a dictionary, it's not surprising that fascists would go after a book full of definitions.

[-] Dreadnaught@sh.itjust.works 40 points 10 months ago

After reading a little bit, it's not that they banned dictionaries, but it seems the district got ahead of the curve. The law itself is the problem

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 34 points 10 months ago

That's why they have an overly broad definition of what is prohibited. So they can pick and choose what they will allow.

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago

In this case I think the district is doing this in protest. The legislators intended to pick and choose, but the district is applying it as written, so Dictionaries are out. They're highlighting how absurd the law is.

[-] CobblerScholar@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

That was my impression, similar move to schools banning the Bible citing all the beastiality, rape and mass murder in there

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

Eh, I think this is going to play into the legislator's designs.

[-] rhythmisaprancer@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

My thoughts as well. This leads to "only approved books allowed."

That's literally and explicitly the point.

From the end of the article:

In a brief submitted by the State of Florida in support of Escambia, Attorney General Ashley Moody argued that the school board could ban books for any reason because the purpose of public school libraries is to "convey the government’s message," and that can be accomplished through "the removal of speech that the government disapproves."

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] b3an@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

Welcome to 1984

[-] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 5 points 10 months ago

Perhaps, but...

Penguin Random House, five authors, two parents of Escambia County students, and the non-profit group PEN America sued the Escambia County School Board last May, alleging that the board's actions violate the First Amendment. The lawsuit relates to decisions by the school board, prior to the passage of HB 1069, to permanently ban several books from Escambia schools.

The Escambia County School Board banned most of these books at the request of Vicki Baggett, a high school English teacher in the county. Baggett is responsible for hundreds of challenges in Escambia County and neighboring counties. She also appeared at the June 2023 board meeting and spoke in favor of the emergency rule.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 12 points 10 months ago

They have already stated they want "their people" to be the deciders. It’s just textbook fascism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 53 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

because it exposes students to "alternate sexual ideologies." Baggett said she was concerned "a second grader would read this book, and that idea would pop into the second grader's mind… that these are two people of the same sex that love each other."

This is the kind of people we are dealing with. They are literally trying to prevent children from developing accepting attitudes towards minorities. That is their stated goal. It's not often I read such blatant disgusting hatred coming from a teacher. The book she was referencing was And Tango makes three. Which is unbelievable in the context of her statement. Were the penguins, who were real actual penguins, somehow a part of an "alternate sexual ideology"? How badly rotten does your brain have to be to think "sexual ideology" when you see 2 penguins raising a baby together?

[-] slurpeesoforion@startrek.website 16 points 10 months ago

You see, tolerance is a slippery slope. First you tolerate the Irish. Next thing you know Italians are semi-ok. Then Polish?! Eventually Catholics and Jews are acceptable. So long as none of these marry across lines.

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ziixe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 10 months ago

Ah, don't you just love when (a part of) the land of freedom advertises propaganda (or censors unwanted ideas more appropriately) against a minority from the early age

Doesn't even remotely resemble anything else /s

[-] BlitzFitz@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Is no one else looking at this line the school district is at this point just pulling every possible book that could match the description of the law in purpose to make a point?

One teacher made a complaint about a couple of books so they said fine, well just remove everything else that this bill could possibly touch. Just to prove how ambiguous and far stretching this law can go?

Of course they shouldn't pull a dictionary but it matches the description. This is to test the law.

[-] piecat@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

Pulling the dictionary accomplishes what they want: a dumber future generation.

Pull the Bible, that's what riles them up

[-] MrEff@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

In Florida you misspelled 'dummer'. You can only sound out the words now.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 24 points 10 months ago

HB 1069 gives residents the right to demand the removal of any library book that "depicts or describes sexual conduct," as defined under Florida law, whether or not the book is pornographic.

I was going to ask how their bible gets around this, but then I found several instances of its removal in Florida.

These librarians. I like them. Assuming they're doing this as a statement.

[-] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I hope they've alerted their groundskeepers that all trees, shrubs, bushes, and flowers must be mowed over, because pollen and flowers are Nature's pole-dancers and sluts. Not sure if they can have grass.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

Grass is a euphemism for marijuana so they can't have that or it will give kids ideas

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 17 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Parents NEED to lodge formal complaints with the police and school boards in EVERY district that still has dictionaries and encyclopedias in the libraries.

Whittle down every district until they're only allowed to work on coloring books for every grade K-12, or as close as they can get.

Don't forget to target private schools with massive social media campaigns to inform all parents that dictionaries = grooming. If the private schools refuse to respond, convince the dumber wealthy parents to pull their kids and put them into a safe school, without books.

[-] 000@fuck.markets 17 points 10 months ago

But that's their goal, they want kids to be stupid so they'll vote republican when they grow up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] charonn0@startrek.website 16 points 10 months ago

The reality in Escambia County serves as a rejoinder to DeSantis, who has described concerns about book removals as a "leftist activist hoax" and a "false political narrative."

If Floridians had a dictionary to look up "rejoinder" with, they'd be very upset.

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago

/m/MaliciousCompliance is leaking :D

[-] febra@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

I thought this was an Onion article when I saw the title.

I wish I was right.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago

We should also ban math books, and history books. Full of sexual descriptions and imagery. Ban economy books too, full baabout advice on how to rape the poor, and the bible too with its incest and rape stories, and you know, let's ban all the books and then just go to school to hold hands and sing hallelujah and praise Jesus.

I see a number of Republican politicians getting very wet at this idea...

[-] Toribor@corndog.social 2 points 10 months ago

Math books are full of Arabic numbers. Clearly it's indoctrinating our children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

They did keep guns though. Those are more important.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

DeSantis has a stranglehold on people here in FL because he kept stuff open during Covid. So people mindlessly co-sign everything he does and Dems pretty much have given up here. They are going after all forms of education and history they don't agree with.

[-] batmaniam@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

lol to the bit about Atlas Shrugged. Although yeah there are a few passages in there that are basically erotica, forgot about that. It's been a long time but I remember them being "NC-17" not "R" rated.

(usual thing I have to say here about this book here: I'm aware it's badly written and terrible as philosophy excersize, I just liked my steam-punk sci-fi with trains)

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

With rights to request removal of books when they have descriptions of sexual activity, I'd say the bible is definitely a prime target. It has incest, rape, and even those are kind of fan favorites for republican politicians, they too must recognize that Bible's are evil and must be banned.

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Soon: "All books are now banned because they contain the letters L, G, B, T and Q. Any books containing these five letters will now be banned from public libraries."

[-] ray@kbin.social 2 points 10 months ago

Ernest Vincent Wright: "Hold my beer"

[-] PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ernes* Vincen* Wri* h*

[-] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Guess they got tired tired of hearing "words have meanings" in response to their mindless rambling.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
430 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19144 readers
2327 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS