742
submitted 1 week ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Summary

Trump admitted it will be difficult to lower consumer prices, despite campaign promises to reduce grocery, energy, and overall inflation costs.

Trump told Time that achieving price reductions is rare without major economic downturns.

During the campaign, Trump blamed rising costs on Democratic leadership and proposed tariffs as a solution, but economists warn tariffs could raise prices further.

Inflation, a key voter concern, played a significant role in Trump’s election victory, though he has yet to outline a clear plan to deliver on his economic pledges.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PugJesus@lemmy.world 427 points 1 week ago

Oh wow who could have fucking predicted

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 121 points 1 week ago

my prediction is that they'll eventually just start saying "we DID lower prices. for everything" even though every graph will show that the prices have perpetually gone up. for everything. and all the complete fucking moron troompa loompa voters will 100% believe that prices have gone down

[-] AmidFuror@fedia.io 50 points 1 week ago

The graphs will indeed show that prices dropped, but that part will be in Sharpie ink.

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

"The price to buy a Banana has fallen from 3 Dogecoin to 1 Dogecoin. Who cares if it went up in dollars?"

[-] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 week ago

Gotta love living in 1984: The Reality Show.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

The absolute crazy thing is the energy prices. He said he'd cut energy prices in HALF within 12 months. Then he said it again. And again. He like quadrupled down on this and people actually bought it. This dude legitimately promised that all energy prices would be fucking halved in 12 months. I will eat my entire piece of shit car if that happens lol

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 160 points 1 week ago

The only thing shocking here is that he's openly admitting he won't keep his promises.

[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 49 points 1 week ago

Has he ever truly faced consequences for what he says or does?

[-] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

Yes. He was celebrated for it!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 26 points 1 week ago

Nobody knew health care could be so complicated

— President Trump (February 27, 2017)

I mean if nobody got the message he wasn't going to anything. Being direct this time isn't going to help. Literally didn't even fucking LOCK HER UP like he said he would. Don't even get me started on his tax return, still waiting on that, likely will happen on infrastructure week.

Anything that guy says is just utter shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 84 points 1 week ago

I've repeated this before, but here's the truth:

They did not vote for him for the "economy". Or for "America First". Or for "Farmers", "unions", etc.

They voted for him for racism and bigotry against the LGBTQ+ community. That's the only campaign promise they're 100% sure he's going to follow through on. Attacking immigrants and making their life a living hell.

Any other reason they gave is a dog whistle for their support of his absolutely transparent bigotry on display every moment his mouth is open.

We need to stop assuming his voters actually care about the same things we do, or even the things they publicly say. They care about him upholding their racist and bigoted views.

That's it.

[-] Woht24@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago

For some, I would agree. But I'd also say that's an insane over generalisation and these kind of comments are the same shit. People with no serious education on a topic, spewing 'stats' and making sweeping statements.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They do care about bigotry, for sure. But I wholeheartedly reject the notion that they don't care about the economy. The majority of America has suffered catastrophic financial losses over the last 4 years. The democratic platform did not honestly do a very convincing job of showing that they can or will remedy that. And they see everything from a reactionary right wing news source that lies to them.

The proof is in the past week. It's in the bipartisan celebration of the public execution of a mass murderer. Seriously, the conservative right is floundering trying to condemn the slaying while their whole base celebrates it openly. Working class conservatives still suffer medical debt, they still suffer cost of living increases, they still suffer from wage theft and pay stagnation. The way to appeal to those people wasn't to reach out to Republicans it was to reach out to them directly. It was to come forward with a radical plan to change the ways society sucks for all working class people.

The bigotry is unacceptable. I'm a trans woman, I agree. I'm an anarchist. I'm about as opposite politically as I could be from far right reactionary conservatives. The way to actually garner mass appeal among the working class is to actually do things that appeal to the working class. Establishment democrats categorically failed to do that, time and again. This recent health insurance dialog clearly shows that people want change. But instead of advocating for change, the establishment advocated for itself. Instead of combating transphobic and xenophobic narratives they just said the token progressive things expected of them. Why didn't Harris come out and say that focus on trans people and illegal immigrants is meant to draw attention away from the billionaires and capitalists who are profiting off of mass worker exploitation? She couldn't do that. She is as beholden to those billionaires and capitalists as MAGA is.

Like it's time to acknowledge that most transphobic members of the working class don't even understand what trans people are. They are outraged solely because the right wing propaganda tells them to be. The way forward isn't ostracization and more partisanship, but actual dialog focusing on the things that affect them and us negatively. It's far easier to demonstrate to them that they've been fed propaganda about trans people, when we can show them things they already know are true (like health insurance is bullshit) and then point out the propaganda they're being fed on that. We have common enemies. Class unity should be our goal. Not to appeal to Republican pundits and politicians and law makers, but to appeal to the well-being of all working class people. To be actually progressive, to be the actual left and to push for real radical positive change.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] abigscaryhobo@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I get what you're going for, but there are plenty of people that did vote for him for the economy and the like. There are plenty I'm sure that voted because of anti-lgbt issues without a doubt. But casting this blanket statement of "they all" like every single trump voter went to the polls and said "Gee I'd love healthcare, but those gays are a real problem" is dangerous rhetoric. This "us vs them" mentality is what makes things so difficult and divisive in the first place.

You're not going to win people over to your point of view if you lump every single person who doesn't already agree with you under the "racist bigot" umbrella.

Is there hate in their ranks? Sure. Do I think everyone who put trump on their vote card hates LGBT people and anyone not matching their race? No.

I get being upset but they won the election. And if we sit here going "We don't want you anyway bigot!" They're gonna win again. It's just not a healthy mentality to have in a dialogue.

Edit: also not really what the article was about. People did vote for him cause he said he'd lower prices and fix the economy, and he is failing to do that. This is an opportunity to point out his lies and welcome people to a different viewpoint, not slam the door in their face.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 58 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He's saying this because his administration will absolutely approve the Kroger Albertsons merger

https://www.npr.org/2024/12/10/nx-s1-5114999/kroger-albertsons-merger-ftc-lawsuit-court-ruling

[-] Steve@communick.news 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes, that's what the article I linked says.

Kroger and Albertsons saw their $24.6 billion merger blocked on Tuesday by judges in two separate cases, one brought by federal regulators and the other by the Washington state attorney general.

However that's likely temporary until the Trump administration is in. It'll probably be passed within the first year. Kroger and Albertsons just need to settle their current suit and re apply to the Trump administration.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago

Inflation soared above 9% in 2022 as a result of supply chain problems related to the coronavirus pandemic and strong consumer demand that had been buttressed by stimulus checks and other relief policies both Trump and President Joe Biden championed.

Jesus Christ we're still blaming stimulus checks for inflation. Most people couldn't pay more than a months rent at most with the stimulus they received and yet we're supposed to believe that was a huge factor driving prices up? Saying stupid shit like this is exactly as bad as Trump's ridiculous tariff proposals but because it's not a Republican saying it we're just supposed to accept it as gospel. Eat my ass HuffPo

[-] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

we're still blaming stimulus checks for inflation.

Most western countries had inflation as high or higher than the US and did not provide stimulus checks. Gee, I wonder what the common denominator could be...? Certainly not a worldwide pandemic!

[-] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

I'm going to guess the small business loans didn't help either

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 53 points 1 week ago

Here's the thing though, no it's not hard to reduce the price of all of that, you just need to nationalize the industry for essential products. No more investors to please, no need to make billions in profit, prices can be reduced.

[-] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 week ago

bUT, frEe MaRkeT brINg DOwn pRiCe!

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago

Oh man. I wish I could see the faces being eaten.

[-] VinnyDaCat@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

They're all currently in denial and even when prices increase further due to the tariffs they'll just blame it on the previous administration.

Trust me, I've been trying to explain this to these people for a long time. Had a talk with one of them where I told them about this interview and their exact response was to blame Biden.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago
[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 36 points 1 week ago

No kidding, he just lied his ass off like he always does and the dickless MAGAT drones just slurped that jizz right up without ever stopping to think about how insanely fucking stupid the promis was to begin with...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 week ago

I don't think we need a headline or a news story to know this .... nothing he says means anything. The next four years is just going to be a never ending parade of bad faith, anger and anxiety.

[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

I just hope it's only 4 years.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WaxiestSteam69@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago

Everyone iny social circle and at work convinced themselves that he would fix things immediately. I can't tell you how many times I heard "as soon as Trump gets in the economy will get better" or "he'll fix it". He's a liar. A big reason we're here is he didn't get called out enough for being a liar.

I'm pretty sure the only thing he's interested in is revenge and he doesn't care who gets hurt on his path to achieving it.

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 week ago

If people understood the very first thing about economics it would be glaringly obvious that his proposed tariffs would drastically raise grocery prices, and the prices of many other things. Unfortunately, people don't understand, and the media carefully avoids explaining it to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago

Oh my gosh! Oh my! Trustworthy Trump?! He lied... For political gain?

I'm sure the people who voted for him would be very upset right now if they could read.

[-] WaistGunnerPug@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.

[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 week ago

Watch the market monopolize under him

[-] boydster@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 week ago

This is how we finally achieve single payer healthcare in the US in the stupidest possible way and I wouldn't bet against it this point: The Aetnited CigShield Corp!

[-] futatorius@lemm.ee 14 points 1 week ago

That's not single payer, that's single provider (or, more correctly, single denier).

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] dhork@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

Promises Made, Promises Kept*!

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 10 points 1 week ago

Promise *bullshit = new Promise; delete bullshit;

[-] Birch@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To the surprise of literally no one with more than three brain cells

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Trump: "I won on groceries. Very simple word, groceries. Like almost, you know, who uses the word. I started using the word. The groceries. When you buy apples, when you buy bacon, when you buy eggs, they would double and triple the price over a short period of time."

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

We need a Trump poster that quotes him saying,

"The Groceries."

[-] TimLovesTech@badatbeing.social 13 points 1 week ago

You need to watch the video of him at this non-chain grocery store and how confused/impressed he is at everything. And then the owner starts talking to him about it and Trump zones out completely and almost turns away from the guy he's so bored and only there for the PR. The guy has never shopped for himself, and is so out of touch with everyday people. He has lived in a bubble of influencers, con men, and fixers for his whole life, and has no idea how anything around him actually works.

[-] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I can't tell if this is satire or an actual quote.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sirico@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago

🧐 🐆 🐆 🐆 🐆

load more comments
this post was submitted on 12 Dec 2024
742 points (98.9% liked)

News

23627 readers
2495 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS